电工技术学报  2024, Vol. 39 Issue (24): 7728-7741    DOI: 10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.231916
电机及其系统 |
不同定子绕组结构双定子轴向磁通开关磁阻电机性能对比研究
于丰源1,2,3,4, 陈昊1,2,3,4, 王星2,3,4, 王冠钧5
1.中国矿业大学电气工程学院 徐州 221116;
2.新能源电动车技术与装备中东欧国家国际联合研究中心 徐州 221008;
3.江苏省高校新能源发电与电动车国际合作联合实验室 徐州 221008;
4.徐州市新能源电动车技术与装备重点实验室 徐州 221008;
5.无锡市检验检测认证研究院 无锡 214101
Comparative Study on the Double Stator Axial Flux Switched Reluctance Motors with Different Winding Structures
Yu Fengyuan1,2,3,4, Chen Hao1,2,3,4, Wang Xing2,3,4, Wang Guanjun5
1. School of Electrical Engineering China University of Mining and Technology Xuzhou 221116 China;
2. International Joint Research Center of Central and Eastern European Countries on New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology and Equipment Xuzhou 221008 China;
3. International Cooperation Joint Laboratory of New Energy Power Generation and Electric Vehicles of Jiangsu Province Colleges and Universities Xuzhou 221008 China;
4. Xuzhou Key Laboratory of New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology and Equipment Xuzhou 221008 China;
5. Wuxi Inspection and Certification Research Institute Wuxi 214101 China
全文: PDF (16777 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 轴向磁通开关磁阻电机(AFSRM)的磁通路径和旋转轴方向平行,具有轴向长度短、气隙面积大、转矩密度高等优势,被认为是提升开关磁阻电机性能的有效方式,而双定子AFSRM(DSAFSRM)因具有平衡的轴向磁拉力和较大的定子绕组散热面积,是AFSRM结构中最具潜力的研究对象。电机运行性能与定子绕组结构密切相关,为了分析不同定子绕组结构对DSAFSRM性能的影响,该文对三台分别采用集中式绕组、单齿绕线绕组和整距绕组的电机性能进行对比研究。首先,详细分析了三种结构电机的磁通路径,基于相同的外径和轴长尺寸设计了三台样机。其次,利用有限元方法比较了三台样机的静、动态性能。最后,加工制造了采用单齿绕线绕组和整距绕组的两台DSAFSRM样机,实测了电机性能。结果表明,相较于传统集中式绕组结构,采用单齿绕线绕组和整距绕组的DSAFSRM结构提升了电机的输出转矩和转矩密度,不过在效率上有所降低。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
于丰源
陈昊
王星
王冠钧
关键词 轴向磁通开关磁阻电机定子绕组结构磁通路径有限元分析电磁性能    
Abstract:The axial flux switched reluctance motor (AFSRM) features a flux path aligned parallel to the rotating axis, enabling torque output independent of axial length constraints. It offers advantages such as a short axial length, a substantial air gap area, and high torque density. The double stator AFSRM (DSAFSRM) structure is particularly promising due to its balanced axial magnetic force and extensive winding heat dissipation area. This paper focuses on the performance comparison of three DSAFSRM motors employing concentrated, single-tooth, and full-pitch windings, respectively.
Firstly, the flux paths of the three motors employing different stator winding configurations are analyzed. The general design flow of DSAFSRM is given. Three-dimensional finite element models of the three motors are established in the Altair Flux software. Finite element analysis results show that the average static torque values of C-DSAFSRM, ST-DSAFSRM, and FP-DSAFSRM motors are 10.53 N·m, 16.22 N·m, and 16.92 N·m at 30 A applied current and 28.04 N·m, 41.03 N·m, and 48.82 N·m at 100 A current, respectively. In addition, the static inductance characteristics of the three motors are also compared. At 10 A current, the maximum-to-minimum inductance difference values of C-DSAFSRM, ST-DSAFSRM, and FP-DSAFSRM are 11.87 mH, 19.70 mH, and 24.77 mH, respectively, and the maximum-to-minimum inductance ratios of the three motors are 6.30, 6.16 and 8.94, respectively. In addition, the static torque and flux linkage data are imported into the Matlab/Simulink environment, and the dynamic performance is analyzed. The average output torque values of the three motors at rated speeds are 16.7 N·m, 21.5 N·m, and 24.1 N·m for the same voltage and conduction width. The average torque per unit mass of the three motors at rated state is 1.53 N·m/kg, 1.80 N·m/kg, and 1.62 N·m/kg, respectively. However, the average torque per unit volume of the three motors are 22.6 N·m/L, 29.5 N·m/L, and 32.6 N·m/L, respectively. In addition, the efficiency MAP distributions of the three motors are analyzed. Among the three motors, the maximum efficiency value of C-DSAFSRM is more than 94%, the highest efficiency value of ST-DSAFSRM is the next highest (around 92%), while the maximum efficiency value of FP-DSAFSRM is the lowest (around 91%). Finally, the accuracy of the analysis of the static and dynamic performance results is verified by fabricating two prototypes.
The following conclusions can be drawn. (1) FP-DSAFSRM and ST-DSAFSRM exhibit shorter flux paths than C-DSAFSRM. (2) FP-DSAFSRM demonstrates larger maximum-to-minimum inductance ratios than ST-DSAFSRM and C-DSAFSRM. (3) FP-DSAFSRM boasts the highest torque density per unit volume, while ST-DSAFSRM has the greatest torque density per unit mass. (4) C-DSAFSRM achieves a higher maximum operating efficiency. (5) FP-DSAFSRM attains a higher open-loop steady-state speed.
Key wordsAxial flux switched reluctance motor    stator winding structure    flux path    finite element analysis    electromagnetic performance   
收稿日期: 2023-11-17     
PACS: TM352  
基金资助:江苏省科技计划专项资金(创新支撑计划国际科技合作/港澳台科技合作)项目(BZ2022014)、深圳市国际科技自主合作项目(GJHZ20220913144400001)和深圳市基础研究专项重点项目(JCYJ20220818100000001)资助
通讯作者: 陈 昊 男,1969年生,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为新型电机系统及其控制。E-mail: hchen@cumt.edu.cn   
作者简介: 于丰源 男,1993年生,博士,研究方向为开关磁阻电机及其驱动系统。E-mail: cumt_yfy@163.com
引用本文:   
于丰源, 陈昊, 王星, 王冠钧. 不同定子绕组结构双定子轴向磁通开关磁阻电机性能对比研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(24): 7728-7741. Yu Fengyuan, Chen Hao, Wang Xing, Wang Guanjun. Comparative Study on the Double Stator Axial Flux Switched Reluctance Motors with Different Winding Structures. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(24): 7728-7741.
链接本文:  
https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.231916          https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/Y2024/V39/I24/7728