电工技术学报  2022, Vol. 37 Issue (11): 2707-2715    DOI: 10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.210521
高电压与绝缘 |
配电电缆附件复合绝缘界面缺陷类型和位置对电场分布的影响研究
李国倡1, 梁箫剑1, 魏艳慧1, 苏国强2, 雷清泉1
1.青岛科技大学先进电工材料研究院 青岛 266042;
2.国网山东省电力公司电力科学研究院 济南 250002
Influence of Composite Insulation Interface Defect Types and Position on Electric Field Distribution of Distribution Cable Accessories
Li Guochang1, Liang Xiaojian1, Wei Yanhui1, Su Guoqiang2, Lei Qingquan1
1. Institute of Advanced Electrical Materials Qingdao University of Science and Technology Qingdao 266042 China;
2. Electric Power Research Institute of State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company Jinan 250002 China
全文: PDF (8729 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 配电网电缆附件是配电网系统的关键部件,其复合绝缘XLPE/SIR界面是最为薄弱的绝缘位置。该文模拟了电缆附件安装和运行过程中出现的典型缺陷,设计了电缆附件复合绝缘XLPE/SIR界面存在气泡、气隙、水珠、水膜、金属杂质、半导电杂质和绝缘杂质七种界面缺陷结构,通过建立配电网电缆附件界面缺陷电场仿真模型,研究典型缺陷下电缆附件内部电场畸变规律。仿真结果表明:在工频下,气泡缺陷与气隙缺陷在界面上引起的最大电场强度畸变值分别为13kV/mm和4.58kV/mm,随着气泡缺陷尺寸的增加,电场畸变呈小幅增大趋势;水珠缺陷和水膜缺陷引起的最大畸变电场分别为2.94kV/mm和3.74kV/mm,随着缺陷尺寸的增大,电场畸变明显加剧,当尺寸增大两倍时,水珠和水膜引起的最大畸变电场分别提高了18.7%和16%;随着缺陷远离应力锥根部,金属缺陷与半导电缺陷引起的电场畸变先增大后减小,最大畸变电场出现在距离应力锥约2mm处,畸变值约为3.65kV/mm。相比而言,绝缘缺陷引起的最大电场畸变出现在应力锥根部,约为8.74kV/mm,随着缺陷远离应力锥根部电场畸变呈现明显的下降趋势。该文研究结果对于配电网电缆附件故障分析和运行维护具有重要的指导意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李国倡
梁箫剑
魏艳慧
苏国强
雷清泉
关键词 电缆附件复合绝缘界面缺陷电场仿真    
Abstract:Distribution cable accessory is the key component of distribution network system, and its composite insulation XLPE/SIR interface is the weakest insulation position. In this study, the typical defects that occur during the installation and operation of cable accessories has been simulated, seven kinds of interface defects, such as bubbles, air gap, water droplets, water film, metal impurity, semi-conductive impurity and insulation impurity, were designed at the interface of composite insulation XLPE/SIR of cable accessories, the internal electric field distortion law of cable accessories with typical defects is studied by establishing the electric field simulation model of interface defects of distribution cable accessories. The simulation results show that the maximum field distortion caused by bubble defect and air gap defect at the interface is 13kV/mm and 4.58kV/mm, respectively. With the increase of bubble defect size, the electric field distortion increases slightly. The maximum electric field distortion caused by water drop defect and water film defect is 2.94kV/mm and 3.74kV/mm, respectively. With the increase of defect size, the electric field distortion becomes more serious. When the defect size is doubled, the maximum electric field distortion caused by water droplets and film increases by 18.7% and 16%, respectively. As the defect moves away from the root of the stress cone, the electric field distortion caused by metal defects and semi-conductive defects increases first and then decreases, the maximum distortion electric field appears at about 2mm away from the stress cone, which is about 3.65kV/mm. In contrast, the maximum electric field distortion caused by insulation defects occurred at the root of the stress cone, which was about 8.74kV/mm, and with the defect away from the root of the stress cone, the electric field distortion shows an obvious downward trend. This work has important guiding significance for fault analysis and operation maintenance of cable accessories of distribution network.
Key wordsElectric cable accessory    compound insulation    interface defect    electric field simulation   
收稿日期: 2021-04-15     
PACS: TM853  
基金资助:国网山东省电力公司科技项目资助(52062619002F)
通讯作者: 魏艳慧 女,1986年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为高压设备绝缘状态评估、高压电缆半导电屏蔽料特性及应用。E-mail:Weiyhui@126.com   
作者简介: 李国倡 男,1985年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为极端环境下绝缘材料与绝缘技术、多场耦合下绝缘部件电场仿真与结构优化。
引用本文:   
李国倡, 梁箫剑, 魏艳慧, 苏国强, 雷清泉. 配电电缆附件复合绝缘界面缺陷类型和位置对电场分布的影响研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(11): 2707-2715. Li Guochang, Liang Xiaojian, Wei Yanhui, Su Guoqiang, Lei Qingquan. Influence of Composite Insulation Interface Defect Types and Position on Electric Field Distribution of Distribution Cable Accessories. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(11): 2707-2715.
链接本文:  
https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.210521          https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/Y2022/V37/I11/2707