基于计算前沿面的实时仿真数值积分并行构造及其数值模型解耦加速方法

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.220982

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2850 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要数值仿真是先进智能计算的基础与底层核心技术,而计算速度是数值仿真的核心性能指标。然而,随着高开关频率功率器件在电机驱动等系统中的应用,短时间约束给实时及在线数值仿真的计算速度带来了严峻挑战。当前数字平台的计算结构朝着并行化的趋势发展,并行计算被视为短时间约束下优化计算速度的有效途径,但现有的数值模型和数值算法大多基于顺序计算的串行模式,缺乏可并行执行的冗余并行度。因此,本文研究了数值算法的求解核心数值积分的并行优化方法,提出了计算前沿面的优化思路为数值积分算法构造冗余并行度以实现并行计算,分析了其在数值精度与数值稳定性方面的影响,并讨论了在多步与高阶数值积分法上的可拓展性。同时,利用计算前沿面构造的冗余并行度,设计了数值模型的并行解耦分割,并应用于电驱系统实现了元件级的数值加速。最后,在硬件在环的实时数值环境中验证了优化方法的可行性、数值性能以及加速效果。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	何绍民
	张喆
	卢倚平
	杨欢
	沈捷

关键词 ：并行计算, 电驱系统, 计算前沿面, 实时仿真, 数值加速, 数值积分

Abstract：The computation speed is the key performance of numerical simulation, which is the foundation and underlying core technology of intelligent computing. However, with the application of high switching-frequency power devices in electric drive system, the constraint of short computation time has led to the great challenges for computation speed in real-time or online numerical simulation. At the same time, with the trend of parallel architecture in digital platform, parallel computing is considered as an effective way to optimize the computation speed with short time constraint. However, the state-of-the-art numerical models and numerical algorithms are based on serial computation, which are lack of redundant parallelism. To address this issue, the computation front design methodology is proposed to construct the redundant parallelism for numerical integration, so the numerical model can be decoupled and parallel computed based on the redundant parallelism to accelerate the numerical simulation.
Firstly, the relationship between numerical integration and algorithm structure in power electronic simulation is discussed, which is the key to numerical solution of ordinary differential equation (ODE). The computation front involved in numerical integration optimization is proposed and the redundant parallelism construction process of optimization method is described based on predictor-corrector method. Secondly, the influence of proposed method on numerical performance are evaluated from numerical precision and numerical stability. The parallel computing resources are utilized in proposed method to improve the numerical precision without increasing the computation time. Although the numerical stability domain is changed during optimization process, the influence on numerical simulation is limited especially in the applications with small step size. Thirdly, the possibility of general application is discussed from multistep-step integration method and high-order integration method, which proves the computation front can be extended to different types of integration methods. Finally, the parallel numerical model is designed and applied to the electrical drive system based on the redundant parallelism constructed by proposed method, as a result, the model-level numerical acceleration is achieved.
The real-time simulation environment of hardware in the loop (HIL) is demonstrated to confirm the validity, fidelity and numerical acceleration of proposed method. The real-time simulation with serial computing model is compared with offline simulation in Simulink, so the effectiveness of self-defined HIL based on NI PXI is verified. Then, the real-time simulation with parallel computing model is compared between latency-insertion method and proposed method. The results show that the relative error with proposed method is reduced to less than 3%, and the numerical precision of parallel simulation is improved. Moreover, the speedup ratio and parallel efficiency are 1.72 and 57.2% respectively, which expands the step size selection range of real-time simulation.
The following conclusions can be drawn from the real-time simulation analysis: 1) The redundant parallelism of numerical integration can be constructed based on computation front to realize parallel computation. 2) The local step size of numerical integration is changed potentially during the optimization process, which may affect the numerical performance. Thus, the proposed method with accuracy compensation is designed based on predictor-corrector method, which can reduce the simulation error. 3) The parallel acceleration can be achieved without accuracy reduction, but the parallel efficiency is limited due to unbalanced computation load, which could be discussed in future research.

Key words： Parallel computation electrical drive system computation front real-time simulation numerical acceleration numerical integration

PACS:	TM46
	TP337

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目 (52177062)

通讯作者: 杨欢男,1981年生,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为分布式发电与微电网、智能配用电、高效能电机系统等。E-mail：yanghuan@zju.edu.cn

作者简介: 何绍民男,1994年生,博士研究生,研究方向为高效能电机系统数字化设计与验证、电力电子实时仿真技术。E-mail：shirmin001@zju.edu.cn

引用本文:

何绍民, 张喆, 卢倚平, 杨欢, 沈捷. 基于计算前沿面的实时仿真数值积分并行构造及其数值模型解耦加速方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 0, (): 29-29. He Shaomin, Zhang Zhe, Lu Yiping, Yang Huan, Shen Jie. Numerical Model Decoupling Acceleration Method with Numerical Integration Parallelism Construction Based on Computation Front in Real-Time Simulation. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 0, (): 29-29.

链接本文:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.220982 https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/Y0/V/I/29

[1] 马伟明, 王东, 程思为, 等. 高性能电机系统的共性基础科学问题与技术发展前沿[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(8): 2025-2035.
Ma Weiming, Wang Dong, Cheng Siwei, et al.Common basic scientific problems and development of leading-edge technology of high performance motor system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(8): 2025-2035.
[2] International Energy Agency.Global EV outlook 2020[Z]. 2020.
[3] 袁立强, 陆子贤, 孙建宁, 等. 电能路由器设计自动化综述—设计流程架构和遗传算法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(18): 3878-3893.
Yuan Liqiang, Lu Zixian, Sun Jianning, et al.Design automation for electrical energy router-design workflow framework and genetic algorithm: a review[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(18): 3878-3893.
[4] 江悦, 沈小军, 吕洪, 等. 碱性电解槽运行特性数字孪生模型构建及仿真[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(11): 2897-2908.
Jiang Yue, Shen Xiaojun, Lü Hong, et al.Construction and simulation of operation digital twin model for alkaline water electrolyzer[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(11): 2897-2908.
[5] Zhao Zhengming, Tan D, Shi Bochen, et al.A breakthrough in design verification of megawatt power electronic systems[J]. IEEE Power Electronics Magazine, 2020, 7(3): 36-43.
[6] 张栋, 范涛, 温旭辉, 等. 电动汽车用高功率密度碳化硅电机控制器研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2019, 39(19): 5624-5634, 5890.
Zhang Dong, Fan Tao, Wen Xuhui, et al.Research on high power density SiC motor drive controller[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(19): 5624-5634, 5890.
[7] Mojlish S, Erdogan N, Levine D, et al.Review of hardware platforms for real-time simulation of electric machines[J]. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2017, 3(1): 130-146.
[8] Ruba M, Nemes R O, Ciornei S M, et al.Digital twin real-time FPGA implementation for light electric vehicle propulsion system using EMR organization[C]//2019 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), Hanoi, Vietnam, 2020: 1-6.
[9] 薛禹胜, 谢东亮, 薛峰, 等. 支持信息-物理-社会系统研究的跨领域交互仿真平台[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022, 46(10): 138-148.
Xue Yusheng, Xie Dongliang, Xue Feng, et al.A cross-field interactive simulation platform for supporting research on cyber-physical-social systems[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46(10): 138-148.
[10] 吴巨爱,薛禹胜,谢东亮,等.电动汽车参与电量市场与备用市场的联合风险调度[J].电工技术学报,DOI: 10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.221386].
Wu Juai, Xue Yusheng, Xie Dongliang, et al.The Joint Risk Dispatch of Electric Vehicle in Day-ahead Electricity Energy Market and Reserve Market[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society,DOI: 10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.221386.
[11] 何绍民, 杨欢, 王海兵, 等. 电动汽车功率控制单元软件数字化设计研究综述及展望[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(24): 5101-5114.
He Shaomin, Yang Huan, Wang Haibing, et al.Review and prospect of software digital design for electric vehicle power control unit[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(24): 5101-5114.
[12] Shu Dewu, Wei Yingdong, Dinavahi V, et al.Cosimulation of shifted-frequency/dynamic phasor and electromagnetic transient models of hybrid LCC-MMC DC grids on integrated CPU-GPUs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2020, 67(8): 6517-6530.
[13] 郭琦, 卢远宏. 新型电力系统的建模仿真关键技术及展望[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022, 46(10): 18-32.
Guo Qi, Lu Yuanhong.Key technologies and prospects of modeling and simulation of new power system[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46(10): 18-32.
[14] Allmeling J H, Hammer W P.PLECS-piece-wise linear electrical circuit simulation for Simulink[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE 1999 International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems. PEDS'99 (Cat. No.99TH8475), Hong Kong, China, 2002: 355-360.
[15] Bai Hao, Liu Chen, Breaz E, et al.A review on the device-level real-time simulation of power electronic converters: motivations for improving performance[J]. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 2021, 15(1): 12-27.
[16] Dufour C, Mahseredjian J and Bélanger J. A Combined state-space nodal method for the simulation of power system transients[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2011, 26(2): 928-935.
[17] Ould-Bachir T, Blanchette H F, Al-Haddad K.A network tearing technique for FPGA-based real-time simulation of power converters[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2015, 62(6): 3409-3418.
[18] Milton M, Benigni A.Latency insertion method based real-time simulation of power electronic systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2018, 33(8): 7166-7177.
[19] Lin Ning, Dinavahi V.Detailed device-level electrothermal modeling of the proactive hybrid HVDC breaker for real-time hardware-in-the-loop simulation of DC grids[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2018, 33(2): 1118-1134.
[20] 张宏俊, 郝正航, 陈卓, 等. 适用于模块化多电平换流器实时仿真的建模方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2017, 41(7): 120-126.
Zhang Hongjun, Hao Zhenghang, Chen Zhuo, et al.Modeling method for real time simulation of modular multilevel converter[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2017, 41(7): 120-126.
[21] Hui S Y R, Christopoulos C. Modeling non-linear power electronic circuits with the transmission-line modeling technique[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 1995, 10(1): 48-54.
[22] Chalangar H, Ould-Bachir T, Sheshyekani K, et al.Methods for the accurate real-time simulation of high-frequency power converters[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2022, 69(9): 9613-9623.
[23] Grégoire L A, Blanchette H F, Bélanger J, et al.Real-time simulation-based multisolver decoupling technique for complex power-electronics circuits[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2016, 31(5): 2313-2321.
[24] Cellier F E, Kofman E.Continuous system simulation[M]. New York, US: Springer, 2010.
[25] 陈丽容, 刘德贵. 求解刚性常微分方程的并行Rosenbrock方法[J]. 计算数学, 1998, 20(3): 251-260.
Chen Lirong, Liu Degui.Parallel rosenbrock methods for stiff ordinary differential equations[J]. Mathematica Numerica Sinica, 1998, 20(3): 251-260.
[26] Liu Chen, Bai Hao, Zhuo Shengrong, et al.Real-time simulation of power electronic systems based on predictive behavior[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2020, 67(9): 8044-8053.
[27] 李子润, 徐晋, 汪可友, 等. 电力电子换流器离散小步合成实时仿真模型[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(20): 5267-5277.
Li Zirun, Xu Jin, Wang Keyou, et al.A discrete small-step synthesis real-time simulation model for power converters[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(20): 5267-5277.
[28] He Shaomin, Xu Zhiwei, Chen Min, et al.General derivation law with torque-free achieving of integral on-board charger on compact powertrains[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2021, 68(2): 1791-1802.
[29] 章回炫, 范涛, 边元均, 等. 永磁同步电机高性能电流预测控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(17): 4335-4345.
Zhang Huixuan, Fan Tao, Bian Yuanjun, et al.Predictive Current control strategy of permanent magnet synchronous motors with high performance[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(17): 4335-4345.