电工技术学报
论文 |
火箭引雷至架空线路与地面电流对比分析
蔡力1, 杜懿阳1, 胡强1, 彭向阳2, 陈绍东3
1.武汉大学电气与自动化学院 武汉 430072;
2.广东电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 广州 510000;
3.中国气象局广州热带海洋气象研究所 广州 510080
Comparative Analysis of Current of Rocket-Triggered Lightning Striking the Overhead Line and the Ground
Cai Li1, Du Yiyang1, Hu Qiang1, Peng Xiangyang2, Chen Shaodong3
1. School of Electrical Engineering and Automation Wuhan University Wuhan 430072 China;
2. Guangdong Grid Electric Power Research Institute Guangzhou 510000 China;
3. Guangzhou Institute of Tropical and Marine Meteorology China Meteorological Administration Guangzhou 510080 China
全文: PDF (390 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

2018—2019年夏季在广州从化开展了火箭引雷试验,雷击对象分为两种,分别是架空线路和地面。对比了两种引雷情况下各阶段雷电流的电流波形参数的差异,发现引雷至地面情况下初始阶段的最大电流、平均电流、转移电荷、作用积分是引雷至线路情况下的2.8、2.4、2.0、5.3倍。引雷至地面情况下回击的上升时间几何均值为0.25 µs,小于引雷至线路情况下的0.60 µs,而对于电流峰值等其他回击波形参数而言,差异不明显。M分量与初始连续电流脉冲类似,引雷至线路情况下电流峰值、转移电荷、连续电流水平均小于引雷至地面情况下的。基于诺顿电流源等效电路模型分析两种引雷情况下雷电流不同阶段存在差异的原因,可能是由于雷电在不同电流阶段的其通道等效阻抗是不一样所导致的。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
蔡力
杜懿阳
胡强
彭向阳
陈绍东
关键词 火箭引雷架空线路雷电流回击    
Abstract

Most of the current rocket-triggered lightning experiments are conducted with lightning strikes on the ground. Related studies have shown that the properties of the struck object affect the parameters of the lightning. The paths of the lightning flow are very different between direct lightning strikes on the ground and direct lightning strikes on overhead line. It is necessary to obtain the lightning parameters of a real overhead line direct strike and analyze the similarities and differences between them and the ground direct strike lightning parameters for power system lightning protection.
Rocket-triggered lightning experiments were conducted at the Guangzhou Field Experiment Site for Lightning Research and Testing in Conghua, Guangzhou, during the summer of 2018 and 2019. Lightning strikes objects are divided into two kinds, one is overhead line and the other is ground. When lightning strikes on the ground, the lightning current is introduced by the inducing rod to the current measuring equipment installed in the ground launcher, and flows directly into the soil after measurement (grounding resistance is 6.7 Ω). When the lightning strikes on overhead line, the lightning current is first introduced by the current measuring equipment installed in the top of the tower launcher, measured and then flows into the 10 kV overhead line via a wire, and finally the majority of the lightning current flows into the soil via the two nearest towers (the characteristic impedance of the overhead line is about 200 Ω). The current parameters characteristics of the initial stage, return strokes and M-components in the case of lightning to ground and lightning to overhead line are analyzed to compare whether they differ and to analyze the reasons for the differences.
The maximum current, average current, transfer charge, and action integral of the initial stage in the case of lightning to the ground are 2.8, 2.4, 2.0, and 5.3 times those of the lightning to the overhead line. There is no significant difference in the duration of the initial stage between two conditions. The geometric mean of the rise time of the return stroke when the lightning strikes the ground is 0.25 μs, which is much smaller than 0.60 μs when the lightning strikes the overhead line. For other waveform parameters of return strokes such as the current peak, the difference is not obvious. The M-components are similar to the initial continuing current pulses, and the current peak value, transfer charge, continuing current level in the case of lightning to the overhead line are all smaller than those of the lightning to the ground. The rise time, half-peak width, and duration of the M-components are also smaller than those of the lightning to the ground, with the former being about 0.56, 0.59, and 0.40 times the latter. Analysis based on Norton current source equivalent circuit model. The reason for the difference in lightning current between the two lightning conditions is that the equivalent impedance of the lightning channel is different in each stage.

Key wordsRocket triggered lightning    overhead line    lightning current    return stroke   
收稿日期: 2022-11-11     
PACS: TM863  
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(52177154)

通讯作者: 蔡 力 男,1987年生,副教授,博士生导师,研究方向为雷电防护与接地技术,雷电物理与雷电探测。E-mail:cail@whu.edu.cn   
作者简介: 杜懿阳 男,2000年生,硕士研究生,研究方向为雷电物理与雷电防护。E-mail:dyy0318@163.com
引用本文:   
蔡力, 杜懿阳, 胡强, 彭向阳, 陈绍东. 火箭引雷至架空线路与地面电流对比分析[J]. 电工技术学报, 0, (): 222127-222127. Cai Li, Du Yiyang, Hu Qiang, Peng Xiangyang, Chen Shaodong. Comparative Analysis of Current of Rocket-Triggered Lightning Striking the Overhead Line and the Ground. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 0, (): 222127-222127.
链接本文:  
https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.222127          https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/Y0/V/I/222127