Bidirectional Support Capability Analysis and Adaptive Inertial Control Strategy of Wind Turbine
Hu Zhengyang1, Gao Bingtuan1, Zhang Lei2, Wang Wenzhuo3, Pan Shenkai1
1. School of Electrical Engineering Southeast University Nanjing 210096 China; 2. National Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy Grid-Integration China Electric Power Research Institute Nanjing 210003 China; 3. Northwest Branch of State Grid Corporation of China Xi’an 710048 China
Abstract：Inertial response is one of the fast-transient frequency support control methods. In the latest wind farm grid-connected technical specification in China, wind farms are required to have inertial response capabilities. However, the current research on the design of inertial control parameters still needs investigation. When evaluating the kinetic energy stored in the rotor of the wind turbine, the existing literature mostly takes the difference between the current speed and the lower limit of the speed as the baseline value, which makes the speed of the wind turbine drop to the left side of the MPPT point, jeopardizing the small disturbance stability of the wind turbine. In addition, the current research mostly focuses on solving the inertial support of frequency drop events, while ignoring the problem of insufficient power reduction capacity of wind turbines with low wind speed and high wind speed. To address these issues, this paper proposes an adaptive inertial control strategy for wind turbine considering bidirectional support capability for wind power integrated power system. Firstly, based on the typical model of power system integrated with wind power generation, the frequency dynamic response characteristics of the system with different wind power penetrations, control parameters and disturbances were analyzed. Secondly, considering the relationship curves of wind power output and rotor speed, the inertial support capability of wind turbines to frequency rise and drop events was analyzed quantitatively. Thirdly, the adaptive inertial control strategy of wind power generation was proposed.An adaptive inertia coefficient with upper and lower limits, left and right symmetry and adjustable sensitivity to the rate of change of frequency was designed. The upper limit was determined by the inertial support capability evaluation using the Newton-Raphson method, the lower limit was set based on the Chinese national standard, and the sensitivity coefficient was designed according to the inertial support requirement of power system. Finally, the small-signal stability of the control system was analyzed according to the eigenvalue loci. The simulation results show that the proposed adaptive inertial control strategy can reduce the inertia coefficient at low wind speed to ensure that the wind turbine operates within the safe speed range. It can provide strong inertial support with high wind speed and large disturbance, and the frequency drop depth is smaller than the existing typical control strategies. Besides, the proposed adaptive inertia control strategy can ensure that the wind turbine operates within a safe rotor speed range based on the steady-state condition of deloading and can adaptively adjust the inertia coefficient with the increase of the wind power penetration to match the wind power inertial support capability and power system inertial support requirements. Through this investigation, the following conclusions are drawn: (1) Through quantitatively analyzing the kinetic energy absorption/release capacity of the wind turbine, it is indicated that the kinetic energy absorption/release capacity of the wind turbine at medium wind speed is stronger than that at other wind speed ranges, and the wind turbine cannot absorb kinetic energy at high wind speed. (2) Provided that the power regulation range of the wind turbine for frequency rise/drop events is the same, the inertial supportcapability of the wind turbine for frequency drop is stronger than that for frequency rise events in the middle and high wind speed ranges. (3) Simulation results show that compared with the existing typical strategies, the proposed strategy can improve the frequency characteristics of scenarios with low and high wind speed.
胡正阳, 高丙团, 张磊, 王文倬, 潘沈恺. 风电机组双向支撑能力分析与自适应惯量控制策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(19): 5224-5240.
Hu Zhengyang, Gao Bingtuan, Zhang Lei, Wang Wenzhuo, Pan Shenkai. Bidirectional Support Capability Analysis and Adaptive Inertial Control Strategy of Wind Turbine. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(19): 5224-5240.
[1] 汪梦军, 郭剑波, 马士聪, 等. 新能源电力系统暂态频率稳定分析与调频控制方法综述[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43(5): 1672-1693. Wang Mengjun, Guo Jianbo, Ma Shicong, et al.Review of transient frequency stability analysis and frequency regulation control methods for renewable power systems[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43(5): 1672-1693. [2] 高丙团, 胡正阳, 王伟胜, 等. 新能源场站快速有功控制及频率支撑技术综述[J/OL]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023: 1-16. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2107.TM.20230530.1551.003.html. Gao Bingtuan, Hu Zhengyang, Wang Weisheng, et al. review on fast active power control and frequency support technologies of renewable energy stations [J/OL]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023: 1-16. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2107.TM.20230530.1551.003.html. [3] 张祥宇, 胡剑峰, 付媛, 等. 风储联合系统的虚拟惯量需求与协同支撑技术[J/OL]. 电工技术学报, 2023: 1-14. DOI:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.221977. Zhang Xiangyu, Hu Jianfeng, Fu Yuan, et al.Virtual inertia demand and collaborative support technology of wind power and energy storage system[J/OL]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023: 1-14. DOI: 10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.221977. [4] 程鹏, 马静, 李庆, 等. 风电机组电网友好型控制技术要点及展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40(2): 456-466. Cheng Peng, Ma Jing, Li Qing, et al.Key points and prospect of grid-friendly control technology for wind turbines[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40(2): 456-466. [5] 颜湘武, 王德胜, 杨琳琳, 等.直驱风机惯量支撑与一次调频协调控制策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(15): 3282-3292. YanXiangwu, Wang Desheng, Yang Linlin, et al. Coordinated control strategy of inertia support andprimary frequency regulation of PMSG[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(15): 3282-3292. [6] 李少林, 王伟胜, 张兴, 等. 基于频率响应区间划分的风电机组虚拟惯量模糊自适应控制[J]. 电网技术, 2021, 45(5): 1658-1664. Li Shaolin, Wang Weisheng, Zhang Xing, et al.Fuzzy adaptive virtual inertia control strategy of wind turbines based on system frequency response interval division[J]. Power System Technology, 2021, 45(5): 1658-1664. [7] 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 风电场接入电力系统技术规定第1部分:陆上风电: GB/T 19963.1—2021[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021. [8] Kheshti M, Lin Shuyue, Zhao Xiaowei, et al.Gaussian distribution-based inertial control of wind turbine generators for fast frequency response in low inertia systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2022, 13(3): 1641-1653. [9] 张冠锋, 杨俊友, 孙峰, 等. 基于虚拟惯量和频率下垂控制的双馈风电机组一次调频策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2017, 32(22): 225-232. Zhang Guanfeng, Yang Junyou, Sun Feng, et al.Primary frequency regulation strategy of DFIG based on virtual inertia and frequency droop control[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2017, 32(22): 225-232. [10] Hwang M, Muljadi E, Jang G, et al.Disturbance-adaptive short-term frequency support of a DFIG associated with the variable gain based on the ROCOF and rotor speed[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2017, 32(3): 1873-1881. [11] Lee J, Jang G, Muljadi E, et al.Stable short-term frequency support using adaptive gains for a DFIG-based wind power plant[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2016, 31(3): 1068-1079. [12] 李颖颖, 王德林, 范林源, 等. 双馈风电机组限功率运行下频率稳定的变系数控制策略[J]. 电网技术, 2019, 43(8): 2910-2917. Li Yingying, Wang Delin, Fan Linyuan, et al.Variable coefficient control strategy for frequency stability of DFIG under power-limited operation[J]. Power System Technology, 2019, 43(8): 2910-2917. [13] Wu Yuankang, Yang Wuhan, Hu Yiliang, et al.Frequency regulation at a wind farm using time-varying inertia and droop controls[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2019, 55(1): 213-224. [14] 林俐, 李晓钰, 王世谦, 等. 基于分段控制的双馈风电机组有功-频率控制[J]. 中国电力, 2012, 45(2): 49-53. Lin Li, Li Xiaoyu, Wang Shiqian, et al.An active power-frequency control strategy of a DFIG based on subsection control[J]. Electric Power, 2012, 45(2): 49-53. [15] 颜湘武, 崔森, 常文斐. 考虑储能自适应调节的双馈感应发电机一次调频控制策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(5): 1027-1039. Yan Xiangwu, Cui Sen, Chang Wenfei.Primary frequency regulation control strategy of doubly-fed induction generator considering supercapacitor SOC feedback adaptive adjustment[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(5): 1027-1039. [16] Hwang M, Muljadi E, Park J W, et al.Dynamic droop-based inertial control of a doubly-fed induction generator[J]. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2016, 7(3): 924-933. [17] 周天沛, 孙伟. 高渗透率下变速风力机组虚拟惯性控制的研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2017, 37(2): 486-495. Zhou Tianpei, Sun Wei.Study on virtual inertia control for DFIG-based wind farms with high penetration[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2017, 37(2): 486-495. [18] 柯贤波, 张文朝, 李朋旺, 等. 高风电渗透率系统的模糊自适应虚拟惯量控制[J]. 电网技术, 2020, 44(6): 2127-2134. Ke Xianbo, Zhang Wenchao, Li Pengwang, et al.Fuzzy adaptive virtual inertia control for high wind power penetration system[J]. Power System Technology, 2020, 44(6): 2127-2134. [19] Li Meiyi, Huang Wentao, Tai Nengling, et al.A dual-adaptivity inertia control strategy for virtual synchronous generator[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2020, 35(1): 594-604. [20] Lü Xue, Jia Youwei, Xu Zhao.A novel control strategy for wind farm active power regulation considering wake interaction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2020, 11(2): 618-628. [21] 穆钢, 蔡婷婷, 严干贵, 等. 双馈风电机组参与持续调频的双向功率约束及其影响[J]. 电工技术学报, 2019, 34(8): 1750-1759. Mu Gang, Cai Tingting, Yan Gangui, et al.Bidirectional power constraints and influence of doubly fed induction generator participating in continuous frequency regulation[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2019, 34(8): 1750-1759. [22] 毛永恒, 高丙团, 胡正阳, 等. 计及双馈机组直流卸荷的风电场紧急降功率控制策略[J/OL]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023: 1-5. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2107.tm.20230619.1644.003.html MaoYongheng, Gao Bingtuan, Hu Zhengyang, et al. emergency power reduction control strategy of wind farm considering DC chopper of doubly-fed induction generator[J/OL]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023: 1-15. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2107.tm.20230619.1644.003.html. [23] 胡家欣, 胥国毅, 毕天姝, 等. 减载风电机组变速变桨协调频率控制方法[J]. 电网技术, 2019, 43(10): 3656-3662. Hu Jiaxin, Xu Guoyi, Bi Tianshu, et al.A strategy of frequency control for deloaded wind turbine generator based on coordination between rotor speed and pitch angle[J]. Power System Technology, 2019, 43(10): 3656-3662. [24] 刘昊宇, 刘崇茹, 董浩云. 含风电场的MMC-MTDC系统通用频率响应模型[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2023, 47(5): 123-133. Liu Haoyu, Liu Chongru, Dong Haoyun.General frequency response model of MMC-MTDC system integrated with wind farms[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2023, 47(5): 123-133. [25] 耿华, 许德伟, 吴斌, 等. 永磁直驱变速风电系统的控制及稳定性分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2009, 29(33): 68-75. Geng Hua, Xu Dewei, Wu Bin, et al.Control and stability analysis for the permanent magnetic synchronous generator based direct driven variable speed wind energy conversion system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2009, 29(33): 68-75. [26] 王刚, 侍乔明, 崔志勇, 等. 一种风力机虚拟惯量控制与传统发电机调速控制的协调方法[J]. 电网技术, 2015, 39(10): 2794-2801. Wang Gang, Shi Qiaoming, Cui Zhiyong, et al.A coordinated strategy of virtual inertia control of wind turbine and governor control of conventional generator[J]. Power System Technology, 2015, 39(10): 2794-2801. [27] Mauricio J M, Marano A, Gomez-Exposito A, et al.Frequency regulation contribution through variable-speed wind energy conversion systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2009, 24(1): 173-180. [28] 滕贤亮, 谈超, 昌力, 等. 高比例新能源电力系统有功功率与频率控制研究综述及展望[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2023, 47(15): 12-35. Teng Xianliang, Tan Chao, Chang Li, et al.Review and prospect of research on active power and frequency control in power system with high proportion of renewable energy[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2023, 47(15): 12-35. [29] 奥博宇, 王方政, 陈磊, 等. 风电机组变桨减载一次调频模型及聚合方法[J]. 电网技术, 2023, 47(4): 1360-1368. Ao Boyu, Wang Fangzheng, Chen Lei, et al.Primary frequency regulation model and aggregation of deloading wind turbine generators with pitch angle adjustment[J]. Power System Technology, 2023, 47(4): 1360-1368. [30] 李世春, 吕翔生, 钟浩, 等. 大规模双馈风电机组参与调频的电网自适应低频减载策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019, 43(15):109-115. Li Shichun, Lv Xiangsheng, Zhong Hao, et al.adaptive under-frequency load shedding strategy of power grid with large-scale DFIG wind turbines participating in frequency regulation[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019, 43(15): 109-115. [31] Li Yujun, Xu Zhao, Zhang Jianliang, et al.Variable utilization-level scheme for load-sharing control of wind farm[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2018, 33(2): 856-868. [32] 王鑫, 杨德健. 基于变系数PI控制的双馈风电机组自适应转速恢复策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(15): 4120-4129. Wang Xin, Yang Dejian.Adaptive speed recovery strategy of doubly-fed induction generator based on variable PI control coefficient[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(15): 4120-4129. [33] 张正阳, 殷明慧, 李阳, 等. 考虑机组稳定约束的风机一次调频控制策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43(4): 1471-1480. Zhang Zhengyang, Yin Minghui, Li Yang, et al.Turbine stability-constrained primary frequency control of wind turbine generator[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43(4): 1471-1480. [34] Dreidy M, Mokhlis H, Mekhilef S.Inertia response and frequency control techniques for renewable energy sources: a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 69: 144-155. [35] Wang Ye, Delille G, Bayem H, et al.High wind power penetration in isolated power systems—assessment of wind inertial and primary frequency responses[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(3): 2412-2420. [36] 李兆伟, 吴雪莲, 庄侃沁, 等. “9·19” 锦苏直流双极闭锁事故华东电网频率特性分析及思考[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2017, 41(7): 149-155. Li Zhaowei, Wu Xuelian, Zhuang Kanqin, et al.Analysis and reflection on frequency characteristics of East China grid after bipolar locking of “9·19” Jinping-Sunan DC transmission line[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2017, 41(7): 149-155. [37] 张祥宇, 朱永健, 付媛. 基于系统惯量需求的风储协同快速频率响应技术[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43(14): 5415-5429. ZhangXiangyu, Zhu Yongjian, Fu Yuan. wind-storage cooperative fast frequency response technology based on system inertia demand[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43(14): 5415-5429.
2023, Vol. 38 
