电工技术学报  2023, Vol. 38 Issue (17): 4657-4671    DOI: 10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.221012
电力系统与综合能源 |
基于不确定与扰动估计器的直流配电网电压鲁棒控制
林莉1, 范米1, 林雨露1, 罗皓1,2, 王静芝1, 谭惠丹1
1.雪峰山能源装备安全国家野外科学观测研究站(重庆大学) 重庆 400044;
2.国网四川省电力公司经济技术研究院 成都 610041
Uncertainty and Disturbance Estimator-Based Control for Voltage Robust Controller in DC Distribution Network
Lin Li1, Fan Mi1, Lin Yulu1, Luo Hao1,2, Wang Jingzhi1, Tan Huidan1
1. Xuefeng Mountain Energy Equipment Safety National Observation and Research Station Chongqing University Chongqing 400044 China;
2. State Grid Sichuan Economic Research Institute Chengdu 610041 China
全文: PDF (1937 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

为保证在直流配电网母线电压鲁棒控制的同时,实现各源换流器之间电流的合理分配,基于不确定与扰动估计器(UDE)控制方法提出一种电压鲁棒控制策略,分别应用于直流配电网换流站级和换流阀级的控制。换流站级控制器设计重点在于解决负载电流参考值的给定和UDE控制的实现:将容量比引入下垂控制,提出考虑电流精确分配的负载电流参考值设定方法,该方法既充分考虑了各源换流器容量又避免了电流分配受线路参数影响的因素;以各源换流器输出电流能够渐进跟踪该参考值为控制目标,设计UDE控制律,这是实现电压鲁棒控制的关键。换流阀级控制方法应用UDE控制理论对电压源型换流器内环电流控制受到的不确定与扰动因素进行估计并补偿,设计了其UDE鲁棒控制律,证明UDE内环电流鲁棒控制器具有二自由度特性,且控制器参数解耦,简化了参数整定方法。改进后的控制器在提高电流控制抗扰性和鲁棒性的同时,解决了传统PI控制参数整定繁琐的问题。以三端直流配电网为例,对比仿真验证了所提策略的有效性。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
林莉
范米
林雨露
罗皓
王静芝
谭惠丹
关键词 直流配电网电压鲁棒控制不确定与扰动估计器下垂控制二自由度特性    
Abstract

The power system's power supply capacity, quality, and reliability can all be improved with the help of a DC distribution network, which also offers a practical and effective access interface for distributed energy. Therefore, the DC distribution network has become a development direction of power supply in the future. However, the DC distribution network is susceptible to system uncertainties and interference since it is a small inertial system, which leads to large fluctuations and even instability of the DC bus voltage. To address these issues, this paper proposes a voltage robust control strategy based on the uncertainty and disturbance estimator (UDE) control method, which is applied to the converter station level and converter valve level control of the DC distribution network, respectively.
At the converter station level, firstly, the capacity ratio of each converter station is introduced into the droop control, and the setting method of load current reference value is proposed to solve the influence of line impedance on load current distribution in the traditional droop control. Then, according to the UDE control theory, the uncertain dynamic model of the load current of each source converter branch is constructed. Finally, taking the load current output from each source converter can gradually track the reference value of the load current as the control objective, and the converter station level UDE robust droop control method is designed. At the converter valve level, firstly, the system state space model is constructed with the dq-axis current in the voltage source converter (VSC) inner loop as the state variable. Secondly, the dq-axis current reference vector is established according to the UDE standard model. Finally, to make the state vector of the dq-axis current tend to the reference vector, the control input vector is determined.
The simulation results of the three source DC distribution network system in PSCAD/EMTDC software show that, firstly, for the converter station level, under various disturbances, the minimum steady-state voltage of the disturbed DC bus is 740.6 V under the traditional droop control, which is a large deviation compared with the rated voltage of 780 V. When VSC2 suddenly exits, for VSC1 and VSC3 with the same capacity, their respective load currents are stable at 0.124 6 kA and 0.169 3 kA respectively, and current sharing is not achieved according to capacity. The lowest DC bus voltage under UDE robust droop control is 778.50 V, which is sTab.at the rated voltage of 780V. When VSC2 suddenly exits, the load current of VSC1 and VSC3 is finally adjusted to 0.194 kA, realizing current sharing. Then, at the converter valve level, when the AC system fails, compared with the traditional PI dual loop control and UDE robust current control, the corresponding DC bus voltage is 821.6 V and 814.5 V respectively. When the fault disappears, and the time for the system to recover to stability is 0.050 s and 0.041 s respectively. At the time of fault occurrence and disappearance, the peak value of q-axis current of traditional PI dual loop control is 0.0148 kA and -0.013 kA respectively, while that of UDE robust current control is 0.013 kA and -0.002 kA respectively, and the fluctuation range of q-axis current is smaller than the former.
The following findings can be drawn by the simulation analysis: (1) At the converter station level, the UDE robust droop control approach outperforms the conventional droop control method in terms of load current distribution and has a greater robust control impact on the DC bus voltage. (2) At the converter valve level, UDE robust current control has stronger anti-interference and better dynamic performance in voltage control in addition to good current tracking performance in the process of disturbance.

Key wordsDC distribution network    voltage robust control    uncertainty and disturbance estimator (UDE)    droop control    two-degree-of-freedom characteristic   
收稿日期: 2022-06-01     
PACS: TM721  
通讯作者: 林 莉 女,1974年生,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为电力系统运行与控制。E-mail:linli@cqu.edu.cn   
作者简介: 范 米 男,1996年生,硕士研究生,研究方向为直流配电网运行控制。E-mail:eamiyfan@163.com
引用本文:   
林莉, 范米, 林雨露, 罗皓, 王静芝, 谭惠丹. 基于不确定与扰动估计器的直流配电网电压鲁棒控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(17): 4657-4671. Lin Li, Fan Mi, Lin Yulu, Luo Hao, Wang Jingzhi, Tan Huidan. Uncertainty and Disturbance Estimator-Based Control for Voltage Robust Controller in DC Distribution Network. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(17): 4657-4671.
链接本文:  
https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.221012          https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/Y2023/V38/I17/4657