考虑功率传输能力提升的跟/构网风机容量占比优化策略

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.260753

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (8)

全文: PDF (1183 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

为了缓解风电场并网系统稳定裕度不足、系统功率传输能力受限的问题,提出了一种考虑功率传输能力提升的跟/构网风机容量占比优化策略。首先,推导了风电场混联并网系统等效阻抗模型,并通过仿真验证了其准确性;其次,为了表征系统在满足安全稳定约束下的功率输送范围,构建了风机并网系统的传输功率可行域,分析了构网风机容量占比和电网强度对系统稳定性及功率传输能力的影响;再次,兼顾并网系统的稳定性和经济性约束,并考虑系统功率传输能力的提升需求,构建了跟/构网风机容量占比优化模型,通过粒子群算法迭代寻优得到最优配置方案;最后,通过多组算例仿真验证了所提构网风机容量配置方法在有效保证并网系统稳定性的同时提升了系统整体的传输功率能力。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	梅子婷
	申笑林
	刘子文
	张艺琼
	孟肖戈

关键词 ：直驱风电场, 并网稳定性, 功率传输能力, 跟/构网容量占比优化

Abstract：

Insufficient small-signal stability margin can restrict the active-power transfer capability of wind farms connected to weak grids. The objective was to determine the minimum proportion of GFM wind turbines required to satisfy a specified power-transfer demand while maintaining system stability and operating constraints in a hybrid GFL/GFM direct-drive wind farm.
To address this objective, small-signal impedance models were derived for GFL and GFM direct-drive wind turbines and then combined to obtain the equivalent impedance of the hybrid grid-connected system. The hybrid model was verified by frequency-sweep simulations over 10 Hz to 1 kHz under different GFL/GFM capacity ratios. Based on the impedance model, a transmission-power feasible region was defined as the set of active-power operating points satisfying small-signal stability, point-of-common-coupling voltage, wind-turbine output, and power-balance constraints. The damping ratio of the dominant eigenvalue was used to quantify the stability margin, with 0.03 adopted as the lower limit, while the short-circuit ratio (SCR) was used to characterize grid strength. The effects of GFM capacity proportion and SCR on the feasible-region boundary were then evaluated. On this basis, an optimization model was formulated to minimize the GFM capacity proportion subject to the required transmission power and the above constraints, and particle swarm optimization was used to obtain the minimum feasible configuration.
The frequency-domain results show that increasing the GFM proportion changes the hybrid system from an unstable to a stable operating condition, while the subsequent improvement in stability margin gradually diminishes. Under the representative weak-grid condition used for impedance analysis, the pure-GFL system has a magnitude crossover at 501 Hz and a phase difference of 193°, indicating instability. When the GFM proportion increases from 20% to 40%, the crossover frequency decreases from 70 Hz to 10 Hz and the phase difference decreases from 181° to 167°, corresponding to a transition from instability to stability. When the GFM proportion further increases from 60% to 100%, the crossover frequency decreases from 8 Hz to 5 Hz and the phase difference decreases from 145° to 124°, indicating a slower increase in stability margin. Consistent with these frequency-domain characteristics, the feasible-region analysis shows that weaker grids require a larger GFM proportion to maintain the same transmission level. At SCR=1.5 and SCR=1.0, the GFM proportions required for the transmission capability to reach the rated wind-farm capacity are approximately 34% and 40%, respectively. For a pure-GFL wind farm, reducing SCR from 5.20 to 1.50 decreases the maximum transferable active power to 0.69 per unit (pu). At SCR=1.50, increasing the GFM proportion to 10%, 20%, and 30% raises the corresponding maximum transferable powers to 0.76 pu, 0.82 pu, and 0.86 pu.
To further examine the configuration results, time-domain case studies were conducted at different system scales. In the 6 MW case with SCR=1.0, the optimized 40% GFM configuration enables the active power to rise from 0.6 pu to 0.8 pu and settle at a new operating point by 2.1 s, whereas the lower-capacity comparison case exhibits divergent oscillation. Similarly, in the 40 MW case with SCR=1.8, seven GFM turbines allow the wind-farm output to increase from 0.7 pu to 1.0 pu and settle by 4.7 s, while the six-GFM comparison case does not converge. In the 80-turbine, 160 MW wind-farm model with SCR=1.5, the optimized GFM proportion is 25%. Following the fault, the active power recovers with an approximately 4%-5% short-duration overshoot and settles at about 1.75 s, whereas the 18.75% GFM comparison case shows sustained near-constant-amplitude oscillation after fault clearance.
Overall, the results establish a quantitative relationship among grid strength, GFM capacity proportion, stability margin, and transferable active power. The feasible-region formulation converts the stability effect of GFM integration into an explicit power-transfer boundary. Accordingly, the optimization procedure determines the minimum GFM proportion required to satisfy a prescribed transmission requirement under the specified stability and operating constraints.

Key words： Direct-drive wind farms grid-following/grid-forming wind turbines small-signal stability power transmission capability capacity proportion optimization

收稿日期: 2026-05-15

PACS:

TM711

基金资助:

智能电网重大专项（2030）(2024ZD0801400)、国家电网公司科技项目(52272224000V)资助

通讯作者: 刘子文男,1991年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为新能源并网运行与控制技术等。E-mail：liuziwen@hhu.edu.cn

作者简介: 梅子婷女,2000年生,硕士研究生,研究方向为风电并网运行控制技术等。E-mail：m18548773@163.com

引用本文:

梅子婷, 申笑林, 刘子文, 张艺琼, 孟肖戈. 考虑功率传输能力提升的跟/构网风机容量占比优化策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 0, (): 260753-. Mei Ziting, Shen Xiaolin, Liu Ziwen, Zhang Yiqiong, Meng Xiaoge. Optimal Capacity Proportion of GFL/GFM Wind Turbines Considering Power Transmission Capability Improvement. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 0, (): 260753-.

链接本文:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.260753 https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/Y0/V/I/260753

[1] 高本锋, 邓鹏程, 孙大卫, 等. 基于匹配控制的构网型直驱风电场次同步振荡机理与特性研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(9): 2755-2770.
Gao Benfeng, Deng Pengcheng, Sun Dawei, et al.Mechanism and characteristics of subsynchronous oscillation of grid-forming direct-drive wind farm based on matching control[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(9): 2755-2770.
[2] 刘子文,吕晓举,叶拓然,等.考虑风速不确定性与风机转子延迟响应的风电场可用惯量评估方法[J].中国电机工程学报, 2026, 网络首发.
Liu Ziwen, Lyu Xiaoju, Ye Tuoran,et al.Available Inertia Energy Evaluation of Wind Farm Considering Wind Speed Uncertainty and Delay Response of Turbine Rotor[J].Proceedings of the CSEE, 2026, early access.
[3] 陈建, 任永峰, 孟庆天, 等. 含UDE附加阻尼支路的构网型直驱永磁同步风电机组次同步振荡抑制策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(7): 1985-2000.
Chen Jian, Ren Yongfeng, Meng Qingtian, Xue Yu, He Jinwei.Sub-Synchronous Oscillation Suppression Strategy for Grid-Forming Direct-Drive Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator with Uncertainty and Disturbance Estimator Supplementary Damping Branch[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(7): 1985-2000.
[4] 孙培博, 王伟胜, 汪海蛟, 何国庆, 孙艳霞. 计及小干扰稳定约束的新能源并网系统构网型单元配置方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2025, 40(9): 2809-2826.
Sun Peibo, Wang Weisheng, Wang Haijiao, He Guoqing, Sun Yanxia.Configuration Method for Grid-Forming Units of Renewable Energy Grid-Integration System Considering Small Signal Stability Constraints[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2025, 40(9): 2809-2826.
[5] 刘垚,裴玮,邓卫,等.多端柔性直流系统功率传输边界关键参数分析[J].电力系统及其自动化学报,2020,32(09):68-76.
LIU G, PEI W, DENG W, Analysis of key parameters of power transmission boundary of multi-terminal flexible DC system[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2020, 32(09): 68-76.
[6] RÍOS-CASTRO D, FERNÁNDEZ-ABRALDES P M, PÉREZ-ESTÉVEZ D, et al. Grid-forming converter with enhanced current limiting dynamics during grid faults and wide stability range[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2025, 40(10): 15042-15063.
[7] 熊小玲, 李昕悦, 周琰, 罗博晨. 基于陷波器的构网型换流器同步频率谐振抑制策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(12): 3827-3839.
Xiong Xiaoling, Li Xinyue, Zhou Yan, Luo Bochen.Synchronous Frequency Resonance Suppression of Grid-Forming Converter Based on Notch Filter[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(12): 3827-3839.
[8] LIU P, XIE X, SHAIR J.Adaptive hybrid grid-forming and grid-following control of IBRs with enhanced small-signal stability under varying SCRs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2024, 39(6): 6603-6607.
[9] ZHUANG K, XIN H, CHEN H, et al. Quantitative parameter conditions for stability and coupling in GFM-GFL converter hybrid systems from a small-signal synchronous perspective[J]. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2026 arXiv:2510. 26971.
[10] 王冠淇, 裴玮, 熊佳旺, 等. 新能源场站跟网/构网变流器协同控制策略综述[J]. 高电压技术, 2025, 51(2): 793-805.
Wang G Q, PEI W, XIONG J W, et al.A review of the collaborative control strategy of new energy station and network/network converter[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2025, 51(2): 793-805.
[11] 郭小龙, 杨桂兴, 张彦军, 等. 构网型储能与跟网型光伏混联发电系统阻抗建模与小扰动稳定机理分析[J]. 电气工程学报, 2025, 20(1): 299-308.
GUO X L, YANG G X, YANG Y J, et al.Impedance modeling and small disturbance stability mechanism analysis of grid-based energy storage and grid-following photovoltaic hybrid power generation system[J]. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2025, 20(1): 299-308.
[12] 唐宇, 胡光, 刘永江, 付强, 辛焕海. 基于特征子系统的跟网/构网设备混合外送系统小干扰稳定性分析[J]. 电工技术学报, 2025, 40(9): 2766-2779.
Tang Yu, Hu Guang, Liu Yongjiang, Fu Qiang, Xin Huanhai.Small-Signal Stability Analysis Method for Hybrid Grid-Following/Grid-Forming Delivery Systems Based on Eigen-Subsystem[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2025, 40(9): 2766-2779.
[13] 苟少云, 郭春义. 构网型与跟网型混合直驱风电场并网稳定域分析[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2025, 49(2): 73-83.
GOU S Y, GUO C Y.Grid connection stability domain analysis of grid-based and grid-following hybrid direct-drive wind farms[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2025, 49(2): 73-83.
[14] 李群, 唐伟佳, 汪成根, 等. 计及暂态电压稳定约束的构网-跟网变流器最优配比策略[J]. 浙江电力, 2025, 44(01): 76-83.
LI Q, TANG W J, WANG C G, et al.Optimal ratio strategy of network-following converter considering transient voltage stability constraints[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2025, 44(01): 76-83.
[15] 辛焕海, 王宇轩, 刘晨曦, 等.提高新能源场站稳定性的构网型与跟网型变流器容量配比估算[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2024, 44(14): 5463-5473.
XIN H H, WANG Y X, LIU C X, et al.Estimation of the capacity ratio of grid type and grid type converter to improve the stability of new energy stations[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2024, 44(14): 5463-5473.
[16] 王奕宁, 向往, 张浩博, 等. 构网型直驱风力发电机组比例优化配置分析[J]. 电网技术, 2025, 49(02): 490-500.
WANG Y N, XIANG W, ZHANG H B, et al.Analysis of the optimal configuration of the proportion of grid-type direct drive wind turbines[J]. Power System Technology, 2025, 49(02): 490-500.
[17] 邓晓洋, 吴林林, 李立沣, 等. 基于虚拟阻抗控制的跟/构网混联经柔性直流送出系统中传输容量提升与构网占比优化策略[J]. 南方电网技术, 2026, 20(01): 12-23.
DENG X Y, WU L L, LI Y F, et al.Optimization strategy of transmission capacity improvement and network proportion optimization strategy in the flexible DC transmission system of follow/structure hybrid coupling based on virtual impedance control[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2026, 20(01): 12-23.
[18] 黄欣蕊, 郭春义, 张进, 等. 跟网与构网型储能对风-光-水打捆经常规直流外送系统的功率传输能力影响研究[J/OL]. 中国电机工程学报, 1-14[2026-04-04]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2107.TM.20251107.0920.004.
HUANG X R, GUO C Y, ZHANG J, et al. The influence of grid-based and grid-based energy storage on the power transmission capacity of wind-solar-water bundled through conventional DC transmission system[J/OL]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 1-14[2026-04-04]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2107.TM.20251107.0920.004.
[19] 张舒文, 郭春义, 赵薇, 等. 水光互补柔性直流外送系统的功率传输能力研究[J].中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45(21): 8378-8390.
ZHANG S W, GUO C Y, ZHAO W, et al.Research on power transmission capacity of water-light complementary flexible DC transmission system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45(21): 8378-8390.
[20] TOZAK M, TASKIN S, SENGOR I, et al.Modeling and control of grid forming converters: a systematic review[J]. IEEE Access, 2024, 12: 107818-107843.
[21] LIU P, XIE X, SHAIR J.Adaptive hybrid grid-forming and grid-following control of IBRs with enhanced small-signal stability under varying SCRs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2024, 39(6): 6603-6607.
[22] MA J, LIU J, CUI Z, et al.Hierarchical allocation of grid-following and grid-forming devices for oscillation stability enhancement in renewable energy plants[J]. Symmetry, 2025, 17(11): 1912.
[23] 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 40581-2021 电力系统安全稳定计算规范[S]. 2021.
State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of China. GB/T 40581-2021, Code for Security and Stability Calculation of Power System[S]. 2021.