分散架构下多虚拟电厂分布式协同优化调度

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.220743

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (4)

Download: PDF (1971 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract For multiple virtual power plants (MVPP) in regional distribution network, the coordinated optimization based on the mutual power support between virtual power plants (VPPs) will impove the the flexibility and economical efficiency of scheduling. However, most of the research on MVPP coordinated optimal scheduling adopts the idea of centralized modeling and unified solution. With the increase of the number of aggregated resources, this method becomes more difficult to solve, and is not conducive to the privacy protection of each VPP. To solve these issues, this paper proposes a distributed coordinated optimal scheduling method or MVPP under decentralized control structure based on the idea of "information separation and decision coordination".
Firstly, a distributed coordination and optimal control mechanism for MVPP is constructed. Secondly, the multi-time coordinated optimal scheduling model of MVPP is constructed, and the transaction price function between VPPs is constructed based on the relationship between supply and demand of power. Then, the Lagrange dual relaxation theory is used to relax the optimization model. Finally, the day-ahead multi-time coordinated optimal scheduling problem is transformed into a real-time optimal scheduling problem based on decentralized partially-observable Markov decision process (DEC-POMDP), and the optimization problem is solved based on the improved quantum genetic algorithm (QGA).
Simulation results on the MVPP system composed of three VPPs show that, when MVPP adopts coordinated optimal scheduling, the total amount of electricity sold to the grid is 8 517.60 kW·h, the total amount of electricity purchased from the grid is 125.41 kW·h, and the total cost is 998.68 ¥. When each VPP adopts optimal scheduling independently, the total amount of electricity sold to the grid is 9 921.44 kW·h, the total amount of electricity purchased from the grid is 823.26 kW·h, and the total cost is 1 392.75 ¥. This is because when MVPP adopts coordinated optimal scheduling, the transaction price between VPPs is better than electricity market. Under the incentive of the electricity price, transactions between VPPs are prioritized, and the transaction volume with the grid is reduced accordingly, and the total cost is also reduced. Then, the MVPP coordinated optimal scheduling model is solved by the centralized and distributed optimization methods respectively, the calculation results of these two methods are basically consistent, and the calculation time is 42.67 s and 12.84 s respectively. Based on the proposed distributed optimization method, each VPP only needs to interact with Lagrangian multipliers, and each sub-problem can be calculated in parallel to improve the solution efficiency, which takes into account the information privacy and computing efficiency. Finally, comparing the day-ahead optimal scheduling and the real-time optimal scheduling based on DEC-POMDP, when the day-ahead optimal scheduling plan is executed, the power shortage or surplus caused by prediction error are made up or absorbed by the power grid. While the real-time optimal scheduling based on DEC-POMDP performs optimal calculation based on the measured values of wind power and load, VPP can cope with the fluctuation of wind power and load through internal resources coordination or mutual power support between VPPs, which will reduce the electricity transactions with the grid.
The following conclusions can be drawn from the simulation analysis: (1) MVPP reduces the electricity transactions with electricity market based on coordinated optimal scheduling through the mutual power support among internal VPPs, and constructs the inter-VPP transaction price function to improve the enthusiasm of VPP to participate in direct trading, which has higher economical efficiency compared with the independent optimal scheduling of each VPP. (2) The distributed coordinated optimal scheduling model of MVPP based on the principle of Lagrange dual relaxation, can realize the global optimization only by exchanging a small amount of information between VPPs, and guarantee the information privacy of VPP better than the centralized optimization. (3) The MVPP multi-time coordinated optimal scheduling problem is transformed into a real-time optimal scheduling problem based on DEC-POMDP, which can effectively deal with the scheduling deviation caused by the prediction error and ensure the reasonable allocation of the resource output plan within one day.

Key words： Multiple virtual power plants Lagrangian dual relaxation distributed optimization real-time optimal scheduling

Received: 05 May 2022

PACS:	TM62
	TM73

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Li Xiangyu
	Zhao Dongmei

Cite this article:

Li Xiangyu,Zhao Dongmei. Distributed Coordinated Optimal Scheduling of Multiple Virtual Power Plants Based on Decentralized Control Structure[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(7): 1852-1863.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.220743 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2023/V38/I7/1852

[1] 姜涛, 张东辉, 李雪, 等. 含分布式光伏的主动配电网电压分布式优化控制[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2021, 41(9): 102-109, 125.
Jiang Tao, Zhang Donghui, Li Xue, et al.Distributed optimal control of voltage in active distribution network with distributed photovoltaic[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2021, 41(9): 102-109, 125.
[2] 刁涵彬, 李培强, 吕小秀, 等. 考虑多元储能差异性的区域综合能源系统储能协同优化配置[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(1): 151-165.
Diao Hanbin, Li Peiqiang, Lü Xiaoxiu, et al.Coordinated optimal allocation of energy storage in regional integrated energy system considering the diversity of multi-energy storage[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(1): 151-165.
[3] 余光正, 林涛, 汤波, 等. 计及谐波裕度-均衡度的分布式电源最大准入功率计算方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(9): 1857-1865, 1875.
Yu Guangzheng, Lin Tao, Tang Bo, et al.Calculation method of distributed generator maximum access power considering balance degree of harmonic margin[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(9): 1857-1865, 1875.
[4] 田立亭, 程林, 郭剑波, 等. 虚拟电厂对分布式能源的管理和互动机制研究综述[J]. 电网技术, 2020, 44(6): 2097-2108.
Tian Liting, Cheng Lin, Guo Jianbo, et al.A review on the study of management and interaction mechanism for distributed energy in virtual power plants[J]. Power System Technology, 2020, 44(6): 2097-2108.
[5] Pudjianto D, Ramsay C, Strbac G.Virtual power plant and system integration of distributed energy resources[J]. IET Renewable Power Generation, 2007, 1(1): 10.
[6] Vasirani M, Kota R, Cavalcante R L G, et al. An agent-based approach to virtual power plants of wind power generators and electric vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2013, 4(3): 1314-1322.
[7] Mnatsakanyan A, Kennedy S W.A novel demand response model with an application for a virtual power plant[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2015, 6(1): 230-237.
[8] 林毓军, 苗世洪, 杨炜晨, 等. 面向多重不确定性环境的虚拟电厂日前优化调度策略[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2021, 41(12): 143-150.
Lin Yujun, Miao Shihong, Yang Weichen, et al.Day-ahead optimal scheduling strategy of virtual power plant for environment with multiple uncertainties[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2021, 41(12): 143-150.
[9] 麻秀范, 王戈, 朱思嘉, 等. 计及风电消纳与发电集团利益的日前协调优化调度[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(3): 579-587.
Ma Xiufan, Wang Ge, Zhu Sijia, et al.Coordinated day-ahead optimal dispatch considering wind power consumption and the benefits of power generation group[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(3): 579-587.
[10] 袁桂丽, 陈少梁, 刘颖, 等. 基于分时电价的虚拟电厂经济性优化调度[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40(3): 826-832.
Yuan Guili, Chen Shaoliang, Liu Ying, et al.Economic optimal dispatch of virtual power plant based on time-of-use power price[J]. Power System Technology, 2016, 40(3): 826-832.
[11] 张高, 王旭, 蒋传文. 基于主从博弈的含电动汽车虚拟电厂协调调度[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2018, 42(11): 48-55.
Zhang Gao, Wang Xu, Jiang Chuanwen.Stackelberg game based coordinated dispatch of virtual power plant considering electric vehicle management[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2018, 42(11): 48-55.
[12] 刘方, 徐耀杰, 杨秀, 等. 考虑电能交互共享的虚拟电厂集群多时间尺度协调运行策略[J]. 电网技术, 2022, 46(2): 642-656.
Liu Fang, Xu Yaojie, Yang Xiu, et al.Multi-time scale coordinated operation strategy of virtual power plant clusters considering power interactive sharing[J]. Power System Technology, 2022, 46(2): 642-656.
[13] 陈妤, 卫志农, 胥峥, 等. 电力体制改革下的多虚拟电厂联合优化调度策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019, 43(7): 42-49, 165.
Chen Yu, Wei Zhinong, Xu Zheng, et al.Optimal scheduling strategy of multiple virtual power plants under electricity market reform[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019, 43(7): 42-49, 165.
[14] 杨洪朝, 杨迪, 孟科. 高比例可再生能源渗透下多虚拟电厂多时间尺度协调优化调度[J]. 智慧电力, 2021, 49(2): 60-68.
Yang Hongzhao, Yang Di, Meng Ke.Multi-time scale coordination optimal scheduling of multiple virtual power plants with high-penetration renewable energy integration[J]. Smart Power, 2021, 49(2): 60-68.
[15] Yi Zhongkai, Xu Yinliang, Zhou Jianguo, et al.Bi-level programming for optimal operation of an active distribution network with multiple virtual power plants[J]. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2020, 11(4): 2855-2869.
[16] Wang Yao, Ai Xin, Tan Zhongfu, et al.Interactive dispatch modes and bidding strategy of multiple virtual power plants based on demand response and game theory[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2016, 7(1): 510-519.
[17] 董雷, 涂淑琴, 李烨, 等. 基于元模型优化算法的主从博弈多虚拟电厂动态定价和能量管理[J]. 电网技术, 2020, 44(3): 973-983.
Dong Lei, Tu Shuqin, Li Ye, et al.A stackelberg game model for dynamic pricing and energy management of multiple virtual power plants using metamodel-based optimization method[J]. Power System Technology, 2020, 44(3): 973-983.
[18] 刘思源, 艾芊, 郑建平, 等. 多时间尺度的多虚拟电厂双层协调机制与运行策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(3): 753-761.
Liu Siyuan, Ai Qian, Zheng Jianping, et al.Bi-level coordination mechanism and operation strategy of multi-time scale multiple virtual power plants[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(3): 753-761.
[19] 周博, 吕林, 高红均, 等. 多虚拟电厂日前鲁棒交易策略研究[J]. 电网技术, 2018, 42(8): 2694-2703.
Zhou Bo, Lü Lin, Gao Hongjun, et al.Robust day-ahead trading strategy for multiple virtual power plants[J]. Power System Technology, 2018, 42(8): 2694-2703.
[20] 向明旭, 杨知方, 余娟, 等. 配电网线性潮流模型通式及误差分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(6): 2053-2064.
Xiang Mingxu, Yang Zhifang, Yu Juan, et al.Linear power flow model in distribution network: unified expression and error analysis[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(6): 2053-2064.
[21] 罗天, 汪可友, 李国杰, 等. 基于拉格朗日对偶松弛的多区域柔性直流互联电网无功优化[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019, 43(11): 68-76.
Luo Tian, Wang Keyou, Li Guojie, et al.Reactive power optimization in multi-area VSC-HVDC interconnected power grids based on Lagrangian dual relaxation[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019, 43(11): 68-76.
[22] Bernstein D S, Givan R, Immerman N, et al.The complexity of decentralized control of Markov decision processes[J]. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2002, 27(4): 819-840.
[23] 帅航. 基于近似动态规划(ADP)的微电网日内在线优化运行方法研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2019.
[24] 张京钊, 江涛. 改进的自适应遗传算法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2010, 46(11): 53-55.
Zhang Jingzhao, Jiang Tao.Improved adaptive genetic algorithm[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2010, 46(11): 53-55.
[25] 马速良, 马会萌, 蒋小平, 等. 基于Bloch球面的量子遗传算法的混合储能系统容量配置[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(3): 592-599.
Ma Suliang, Ma Huimeng, Jiang Xiaoping, et al.Capacity configuration of the hybrid energy storage system based on Bloch spherical quantum genetic algorithm[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(3): 592-599.