Wind Farms-Green Hydrogen Energy Storage System Capacity Sizing Method Based on Corrected-Conditional Generative Adversarial Network
Zhu Ling1,2, Li Wei1,2, Wang Qian3, Zhang Xueguang3
1. State Key Laboratory of Smart Grid Protection and Control Nanjing 211106 China; 2. Nari Group Corporation (State Grid Electric Power Research Institute) Nanjing 211106 China; 3. Department of Electrical Engineering Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin 150001 China
Abstract：The wind power penetration rate in China is increasing. In order to realize the efficient consumption of wind power, the green hydrogen energy storage system (ESS) is becoming an essential carrier of energy storage. However, the intermittence, randomness, and volatility of wind intraday power make it difficult to produce and store green hydrogen. Providing scenario data for green hydrogen ESS planning and displaying the intraday output fluctuation of wind power is a critical challenge. To address these issues, this paper designs a green hydrogen ESS capacity planning framework based on wind power scenario generation. The corrected-conditional generative adversarial network (CCGAN) is constructed to generate scenario data. Firstly, a corrector based on the improved revolving door algorithm is designed in the CCGAN to identify and clean the prediction data under the prediction misaim and wind power ramp events to ensure the high reference of conditional information. Secondly, the dilated convolution is embedded in the generator and discriminator to overcome the problem of the insufficient receptive field. Thirdly, by imposing constraints on the production and storage of green hydrogen, a multi-objective optimization model for green hydrogen ESS sizing is developed. The definition of knee region under Chebyshev distance is introduced. The non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm based on knee region (kr-NSGA-Ⅲ) is designed to solve the capacity sizing model. Finally, the simulation based on the New England 39-bus system verifies the generated scenario’s accuracy and the planning model’s effectiveness. Simulation results on the actual wind farm data show that, when predictions are accurate, both conditional generative adversarial network (CGAN) and CCGAN have higher coverage for measured data. At the same confidence level, the power fluctuation range given by CCGAN is smaller, which reflects that the method has higher accuracy for random fluctuation. Under the prediction misaim event, the coverage of CCGAN is much higher than that of CGAN, and the fluctuation range is reduced by 12.4 MW at a 100% confidence level. Under the wind power ramp event, the mean absolute percentage error of the scenario data generated by CCGAN is kept within 30%. At a 90% confidence level, CCGAN can still have a coverage of more than 80%, reflecting the ability to characterize the short-term fluctuation of wind power. In the four generative scenarios, the sizing results of CCGAN are compared with the measured values, CGAN, robust optimization, and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). The sizing results of CCGAN are generally smaller than CGAN and robust optimization but larger than the measured values, and the total economic cost is also lower than MCMC. Robust optimization and MCMC are easy to overestimate the uncertainty of wind power because these methods do not use the statistical value of prediction data. The scenario generated by the proposed method reasonably considers wind power fluctuation based on measured data, and the sizing result is a tradeoff between robustness and economy. The following conclusions can be drawn from the simulation analysis: (1) By employing the improved revolving door algorithm, the CCGAN’s corrector can accurately identify the prediction misaim and wind power ramp events and perform targeted correction on the conditional information of the input generator, providing a reliable label for data generation. (2) Compared with the robust optimization, MCMC, and CGAN, the wind power scenario generation based on CCGAN can capture the fluctuation characteristics of wind power, and the generated data can consider both high confidence and narrow fluctuation range, providing a high-quality scenario set for green hydrogen ESS planning. (3) The results of green hydrogen ESS sizing show that under the samples with frequent prediction misaim events, the scenario of CGAN will lead to the deviation of planning results from reality. Compared with robust optimization, the planning results of the proposed method can reduce investment costs.
朱玲, 李威, 王骞, 张学广. 基于校正条件生成对抗网络的风电场群绿氢储能系统容量配置[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(3): 714-730.
Zhu Ling, Li Wei, Wang Qian, Zhang Xueguang. Wind Farms-Green Hydrogen Energy Storage System Capacity Sizing Method Based on Corrected-Conditional Generative Adversarial Network. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(3): 714-730.
[1] 李争, 张蕊, 孙鹤旭, 等. 可再生能源多能互补制-储-运氢关键技术综述[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(3): 446-462. Li Zheng, Zhang Rui, Sun Hexu, et al.Review on key technologies of hydrogen generation, storage and transportation based on multi-energy complementary renewable energy[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(3): 446-462. [2] 张鹏成, 徐箭, 柯德平, 等. 氢能驱动下钢铁园区能源系统优化配置[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022, 46(14): 1-10. Zhang Pengcheng, Xu Jian, Ke Deping, et al.Optimal configuration of energy system in iron and steel park driven by hydrogen energy[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46(14): 1-10. [3] 孙鹤旭, 李争, 陈爱兵, 等. 风电制氢技术现状及发展趋势[J]. 电工技术学报, 2019, 34(19): 4071-4083. Sun Hexu, Li Zheng, Chen Aibing, et al.Current status and development trend of hydrogen production technology by wind power[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2019, 34(19): 4071-4083. [4] 赵书强, 金天然, 李志伟, 等. 考虑时空相关性的多风电场出力场景生成方法[J]. 电网技术, 2019, 43(11): 3997-4004. Zhao Shuqiang, Jin Tianran, Li Zhiwei, et al.Wind power scenario generation for multiple wind farms considering temporal and spatial correlations[J]. Power System Technology, 2019, 43(11): 3997-4004. [5] 张俊涛, 程春田, 申建建, 等. 考虑风光不确定性的高比例可再生能源电网短期联合优化调度方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40(18): 5921-5932. Zhang Juntao, Cheng Chuntian, Shen Jianjian, et al.Short-term joint optimal operation method for high proportion renewable energy grid considering wind-solar uncertainty[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40(18): 5921-5932. [6] 仉梦林, 胡志坚, 王小飞, 等. 基于动态场景集和需求响应的二阶段随机规划调度模型[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2017, 41(11): 68-76. Zhang Menglin, Hu Zhijian, Wang Xiaofei, et al.Two-stage stochastic programming scheduling model based on dynamic scenario sets and demand response[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2017, 41(11): 68-76. [7] 马燕峰, 李鑫, 刘金山, 等. 考虑风电场时空相关性的多场景优化调度[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2020, 40(2): 55-65. Ma Yanfeng, Li Xin, Liu Jinshan, et al.Multi-scenario optimal dispatch considering temporal-spatial correlation of wind farms[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2020, 40(2): 55-65. [8] 董雷, 孟天骄, 陈乃仕, 等. 采用马尔可夫链—多场景技术的交直流主动配电网优化调度[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2018, 42(5): 147-153. Dong Lei, Meng Tianjiao, Chen Naishi, et al.Optimized scheduling of AC/DC hybrid active distribution network using Markov chains and multiple scenarios technique[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2018, 42(5): 147-153. [9] Zhang Wenjie, Luo Yonghong, Zhang Ying, et al.SolarGAN: multivariate solar data imputation using generative adversarial network[J]. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2021, 12(1): 743-746. [10] 于文家, 丁世飞. 基于自注意力机制的条件生成对抗网络[J]. 计算机科学, 2021, 48(1): 241-246. Yu Wenjia, Ding Shifei.Conditional generative adversarial network based on self-attention mechanism[J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(1): 241-246. [11] 顾洁, 刘书琪, 胡玉, 等. 基于深度卷积生成对抗网络场景生成的间歇式分布式电源优化配置[J]. 电网技术, 2021, 45(5): 1742-1751. Gu Jie, Liu Shuqi, Hu Yu, et al.Optimal allocation of intermittent distributed generation based on deep convolutions generative adversarial network in scenario generation[J]. Power System Technology, 2021, 45(5): 1742-1751. [12] 马燕峰, 傅钰, 赵书强, 等. 基于WGAN风光资源场景模拟和时序生产模拟的新能源电源容量配置[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2020, 40(11): 77-86. Ma Yanfeng, Fu Yu, Zhao Shuqiang, et al.Capacity allocation of new energy source based on wind and solar resource scenario simulation using WGAN and sequential production simulation[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2020, 40(11): 77-86. [13] 李康平, 张展耀, 王飞, 等. 基于GAN场景模拟与条件风险价值的独立型微网容量随机优化配置模型[J]. 电网技术, 2019, 43(5): 1717-1725. Li Kangping, Zhang Zhanyao, Wang Fei, et al.Stochastic optimization model of capacity configuration for stand-alone microgrid based on scenario simulation using GAN and conditional value at risk[J]. Power System Technology, 2019, 43(5): 1717-1725. [14] Zhang Ning, Kang Chongqing, Xia Qing, et al.Modeling conditional forecast error for wind power in generation scheduling[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2014, 29(3): 1316-1324. [15] 董骁翀, 孙英云, 蒲天骄. 基于条件生成对抗网络的可再生能源日前场景生成方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40(17): 5527-5536. Dong Xiaochong, Sun Yingyun, Pu Tianjiao.Day-ahead scenario generation of renewable energy based on conditional GAN[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40(17): 5527-5536. [16] 邓智宏, 江岳文. 考虑制氢效率特性的风氢系统容量优化[J]. 可再生能源, 2020, 38(2): 259-266. Deng Zhihong, Jiang Yuewen.Optimal sizing of a wind-hydrogen system under consideration of the efficiency characteristics of electrolysers[J]. Renewable Energy Resources, 2020, 38(2): 259-266. [17] 司杨, 陈来军, 陈晓弢, 等. 基于分布鲁棒的风-氢混合系统氢储能容量优化配置[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2021, 41(10): 3-10. Si Yang, Chen Laijun, Chen Xiaotao, et al.Optimal capacity allocation of hydrogen energy storage in wind-hydrogen hybrid system based on distributionally robust[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2021, 41(10): 3-10. [18] 周建力, 乌云娜, 董昊鑫, 等. 计及电动汽车随机充电的风-光-氢综合能源系统优化规划[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(24): 30-40. Zhou Jianli, Wu Yunna, Dong Haoxin, et al.Optimal planning of wind-photovoltaic-hydrogen integrated energy system considering random charging of electric vehicles[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45(24): 30-40. [19] 肖白, 刘健康, 张博, 等. 考虑阶梯碳交易和需求响应的含氢储能的并网型微电网优化配置[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2023, 43(1): 121-129. Xiao Bai, Liu Jiankang, Zhang Bo, et al.Optimal configuration of grid-connected microgrid with hydrogen energy storage considering ladder-type carbon trading and demand response[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2023, 43(1): 121-129. [20] 江岳文, 杨国铭, 朱振山. 考虑交通流量捕获的风-氢-电耦合网络规划[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(22): 19-28. Jiang Yuewen, Yang Guoming, Zhu Zhenshan.Wind-hydrogen-electricity coupled network planning considering traffic flow capture[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45(22): 19-28. [21] 袁铁江, 曹继雷. 计及风电-负荷不确定性的风氢低碳能源系统容量优化配置[J]. 高电压技术, 2022, 48(6): 2037-2044. Yuan Tiejiang, Cao Jilei.Capacity optimization allocation of wind hydrogen low-carbon energy system considering wind power-load uncertainty[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2022, 48(6): 2037-2044. [22] Zheng Yi, You Shi, Bindner H W, et al.Incorporating optimal operation strategies into investment planning for wind/electrolyser system[J]. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 2022, 8(2): 347-359. [23] 叶畅, 曹侃, 丁凯, 等. 基于广义储能的多能源系统不确定优化调度策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(17): 3753-3764. Ye Chang, Cao Kan, Ding Kai, et al.Uncertain optimal dispatch strategy based on generalized energy storage for multi-energy system[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(17): 3753-3764. [24] 田坤鹏, 孙伟卿, 韩冬, 等. 满足非水可再生能源发电量占比目标的“源-网-储”协调规划[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2021, 41(1): 98-108. Tian Kunpeng, Sun Weiqing, Han Dong, et al.Coordinated planning of “generation-grid-storage” to satisfy proportion target of non-hydro renewable energy generation[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2021, 41(1): 98-108. [25] Zhu Hu, Qiao Yiming, Xu Guoxia, et al.DSPNet: a lightweight dilated convolution neural networks for spectral deconvolution with self-paced learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2020, 16(12): 7392-7401. [26] 国家能源局. 风电功率预测系统功能规范NB/T 31046—2013[S]. 北京: 新华出版社, 2014. [27] Cui Mingjian, Zhang Jie, Florita A R, et al.An optimized swinging door algorithm for identifying wind ramping events[J]. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2016, 7(1): 150-162. [28] 崔杨, 曾鹏, 王铮, 等. 考虑碳捕集电厂能量转移特性的弃风消纳多时间尺度调度策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(3): 946-961. Cui Yang, Zeng Peng, Wang Zheng, et al.Multiple time scales scheduling strategy of wind power accommodation considering energy transfer characteristics of carbon capture power plant[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(3): 946-961. [29] Vallee F, Brunieau G, Pirlot M, et al.Optimal wind clustering methodology for adequacy evaluation in system generation studies using nonsequential Monte Carlo simulation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2011, 26(4): 2173-2184. [30] 熊宇峰, 司杨, 郑天文, 等. 基于主从博弈的工业园区综合能源系统氢储能优化配置[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(3): 507-516. Xiong Yufeng, Si Yang, Zheng Tianwen, et al.Optimal configuration of hydrogen storage in industrial park integrated energy system based on stackelberg game[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(3): 507-516. [31] 马榕谷, 陈洁, 赵军超, 等. 非并网风氢互补系统的容量多目标优化[J]. 太阳能学报, 2019, 40(2): 422-429. Ma Ronggu, Chen Jie, Zhao Junchao, et al.Multi-objective optimization for capacity of non-grid-connected wind/hydrogen hybrid power system[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2019, 40(2): 422-429. [32] 李奇, 赵淑丹, 蒲雨辰, 等. 考虑电氢耦合的混合储能微电网容量配置优化[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(3): 486-495. Li Qi, Zhao Shudan, Pu Yuchen, et al.Capacity optimization of hybrid energy storage microgrid considering electricity-hydrogen coupling[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(3): 486-495.
2024, Vol. 39 
