电工技术学报
论文 |
多三相分布式绕组和集中式绕组永磁磁阻电机对比研究
汪波1, 徐文翰1, 查陈诚1, 刘朝辉2, 程明1, 花为1
1.东南大学电气工程学院,南京,210096;
2.国家新能源汽车技术创新中心,北京,100176
Comparative Study on Triple 3-phase PMA-SynRM with Distributed Winding and Concentrated Winding
全文: PDF (3716 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

利用磁阻转矩替代永磁转矩,永磁磁阻电机可减少永磁用量,以较低的成本实现相同的性能,该电机在相关行业应用正愈发得到重视。得益于较低的永磁磁链,该类电机短路电流小,非常适合容错设计。电机运行性能和容错能力与绕组紧密相关,因此本文研究了两台分别采用分布式绕组和集中式绕组的多三相永磁磁阻电机,两台电机基于相同性能指标进行设计加工。本文通过深入的有限元仿真和实验测试,比较了两台电机的反电势、MTPA曲线、输出转矩以及不同故障模式下的故障行为和容错能力。结果表明,对于中低速应用场合,采用集中式绕组永磁磁阻电机较之分布式绕组结构具有更好的容错表现。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
汪波
徐文翰
查陈诚
刘朝辉
程明
花为
关键词 多三相容错电机故障运行匝间短路有限元仿真    
Abstract

PM Assisted Synchronous Reluctance Machine (PMA-SynRM) receives increased interests in industry applications. It reduces and the PM usage and offset the torque reduction by employing reluctance torque, achieving comparable performance with lower cost. This type of machine features with low PM flux linkage which is very suitable for fault tolerant application. The machine drive performance and fault-tolerant ability are closely related to their windings. Therefore, this article compares two fault-tolerant motor topology with multiple 3-phase distributed winding and multiple 3-phase concentrated winding.
First, in order to compare and analyze the performance of two types of motors in fair, the two motors should be designed under the same technical specifications, requiring the motor to operate at the rated point with 24 Nm torque at 2000 rpm. For each design sample, simulation calculations are first conducted in Flux, and the relevant data is imported into Hyper Study. Then, Hyper Study uses genetic algorithm to calculate the relevant parameters for the next iteration until the final optimization parameters of the two motors are achieved. Secondly, 2D finite element simulation models of distributed winding motor and centralized winding motor were established using Flux finite element simulation software. The two motors were simulated and analyzed, and the back electromotive force, MTPA curve, output torque, fault behavior and fault tolerance capability under different fault modes are compared and studied. The results show that the efficiency of the concentrated winding motor is 1.1% higher than that of the distributed winding motor. Concentrated winding motor has a lower proportion of reluctance torque and its output torque is 1.2 Nm higher than that of the distributed winding motor when under open circuit condition, but lower than that of the distributed winding motor when under short circuit condition. When under inter turn short circuit, after taking the terminal short circuit(TSC) protection action, the short circuit current of the centralized winding motor is only 80% of that of the distributed winding motor, indicating that the centralized winding motor has stronger fault tolerance performance. Finally, by processing the prototype and building an experimental platform, different load currents are applied to the two motors under healthy operation condition and different fault modes for testing. It was found that the output characteristics and fault tolerance characteristics of the two motors are consistent with the FE simulation results. The experimental results verified the accuracy of the simulation model.
The following conclusions can be drawn: (1) Distributed winding motor rely more on reluctance torque, while centralized winding motor rely more on permanent magnet torque. Centralized winding motor has higher efficiency due to much lower end windings, smaller torque ripple, and better performance. (2) Under open circuit condition, two motors can achieve fault operation through the remaining healthy three-phase windings, and the concentrated winding motor exhibits higher output torque capacity. (3) Under short circuit fault condition, both motors could effectively suppress the short circuit current after TSC, but the distributed winding motor has higher output torque. (4) Under inter turn short circuit fault, after adopting TSC protection action, the inter turn short circuit currents of both motors are significantly weakened, and the fault current of concentrated winding motors is smaller. Fault tolerance performance of the concentrated winding motor for inter turn short circuit is better than that of distributed winding motor. In summary, the two multiple 3-phase PMA-SynRMs are both good candidates for safety critical application. The distributed winding machine is suitable for relatively high speed range while the concentrated winding machine is more suitable for medium and low speed range.

    
PACS: TM341  
基金资助:

国家重点研发计划(2022YFB2502701,2022YFB3403103)和国家自然科学基金(52277035,51907028)资助

通讯作者: 汪波 ,男,1988年生,博士,副研究员,博士生导师,研究方向为容错电机驱动系统等。E-mail: b.wang@seu.edu.cn   
作者简介: 徐文翰, 男,1998年生,硕士研究生,研究方向为容错电机性能优化等。E-mail: xwh19982020@163.com
引用本文:   
汪波, 徐文翰, 查陈诚, 刘朝辉, 程明, 花为. 多三相分布式绕组和集中式绕组永磁磁阻电机对比研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 0, (): 8924-.
链接本文:  
https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.230284          https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/Y0/V/I/8924