发电机组污染排放约束下电量互换合作博弈优化模型

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (288 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Under the pollution emission conditions, objective of the generators is to minimize the overall cost which include cost of production and cost of pollution. In general, the production costs of the larger units are lower than the smaller units. The cost of pollution is the same. The cooperation way between units is that small units transfer some electric power to large units. After transfering, the overall cost will reduce. Then we carried out the distribution of benefits, the result is that the interests of the various units is greater than the pre-collaboration. Considering emission pollution cost in traditional generation economic scheduling problem, the generation interchange model is constructed, which considers emission pollution and contract generation constraints, then using the cooperative game Shapley model to distribute profits between generation units. The results show that this model can shift generating energy from high-cost of generation and emission units to low-cost units effectively.

Key words： Power generation emission economic scheduling cooperative game profit distribution

Received: 29 January 2010 Published: 20 March 2014

PACS:	F407.61
	TM73

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Tan Zhongfu
	Dong Litong
	Liu Wenyan
	Yu Chao
	Song Yihang

Cite this article:

Tan Zhongfu,Dong Litong,Liu Wenyan等. A Cooperation Game Optimization Model for Energy Generating Interchange between Power Generation Units with Environmental Emission Constraints[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2012, 27(5): 245-251.

URL:

http://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/ OR http://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2012/V27/I5/245

[1] 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室. 中国的环境保护(1996-2005). www.gov.cn/zwgk/2006-06/05/content_ 300288.htm.
[2] 陈赟, 严正. 考虑节能减排与网络约束的发电权交易模型[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2009, 37(12): 52-57.
Chen Yun, Yan Zheng. Generation rights trade model based on energy-saving, emission-reducing and network constraint[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2009, 37(12): 52-57.
[3] 徐致远, 罗先觉, 牛涛. 综合考虑电力市场与节能调度的火电机组组合方案[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2009, 33(22): 14-17.
Xu Zhiyuan, Luo Xianjue, Niu Tao. Thermal unit commitment scheme considering electricity market and energy-saving dispatch[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2009, 33(22): 14-17.
[4] 温丽丽, 刘俊勇. 混合系统中、长期节能调度发电计划的蒙特卡罗模拟[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2008, 36(24): 24-29.
Wen Lili, Liu Junyong. Monte Carlo simulation of medium and long-term generation plan in hybrid power system based on environmental/economic dispatch[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2008, 36(24): 24-29.
[5] 邹颖. 河北南网发电节能调度优化研究[D]. 保定:华北电力大学(河北), 2007.
[6] 苏鹏, 刘天琪, 赵国波, 等基于改进粒子群算法的节能调度下多目标负荷最优分配[J]. 电网技术, 2009, 33(5): 48-53.
Su Peng, Liu Tianqi, Zhao Guobo, et al. An improved particle swarm optimization based multi-objective load dispatch under energy conservation dispatching[J]. Power System Technology, 2009, 33(5): 48-53.
[7] Li Shujin, Zhang Qiang. A simplified expression of the Shapley function for fuzzy game[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196(1): 234-245.
[8] 喻洁, 李方兴, 李扬, 等. 互联区域多目标发电调度的协同优化策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2009, 33(2): 30-33.
Yu Jie, Li Fangxing, Li Yang, et al. A coordinated optimization strategy for multi-objective generation dispatch in interconnected areas[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2009, 33(2): 30-33.
[9] 谢国辉, 张粒子, 邵志刚, 等. 改进Shapley值在协同报价利润分配中的应用[J]. 华东电力, 2009, 37(2): 232-235.
Xie Guohui, Zhang Lizi, Shao Zhigang, et al. Application of improved Shapley value to profit distribution for collaborative bidding[J]. East China Electric Power, 2009, 37(2): 232-235.
[10] 谭忠富, 陈广娟, 赵建保, 等. 以节能调度为导向的发电侧与售电侧峰谷分时电价联合优化模型[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2009, 29(1): 55-60.
Tan Zhongfu, Chen Guangjuan, Zhao Jianbao, et al. Optimization model for designing peak-valley time-of-use power price of generation side and sale side at the direction of energy conservation dispatch[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2009, 29(1): 55-60.
[11] Abido M A. Environmental/economic power dispatch using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2003, 18(4): 1529-1536.
[12] 尚金成. 基于节能减排的发电权交易理论及应用(一)发电权交易理论[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2009, 33(12): 46-52.
Shang Jincheng. Generation right exchange theory and its applications based on energy-saving and emission-reducing part one generation right exchange theory[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2009, 33(12): 46-52.
[13] 喻洁, 李扬, 夏安邦. 兼顾环境保护与经济效益的发电调度分布式优化策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2009, 29(16): 63-68.
Yu Jie, Li Yang, Xia Anbang. Distributed optimization of generation dispatch schedule considering environmental protection and economic profits[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2009, 29(16): 63-68.
[14] 彭春华. 综合环境保护及竞价风险的发电侧经济运行[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2008, 28(28): 97-102.
Peng Chunhua. Economic operation problem of generating side considering environmental protection and bidding risk[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008, 28(28): 97-102.
[15] 谭忠富, 李莉, 王建军, 等. 多智能体代理下电力双边谈判中的模糊贝叶斯学习模型[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2009, 29(7): 106-113.
Tan Zhongfu, Li Li, Wang Jianjun, et al. A fuzzy bayesian learning model in agent-based electric power bilateral negotiation[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2009, 29(7): 106-113.