计及风电不确定性的含线间潮流控制器的电力系统经济调度

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.211809

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2601 KB) HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要线间潮流控制器（IPFC）拥有强大的潮流调控能力,可为解决大规模新能源接入背景下的潮流调控问题提供全新的解决方案。该文提出一种计及风电出力不确定性的含IPFC电力系统安全约束经济调度方法,首先基于MARKOV链生成风电出力场景,构建相应概率风险指标以描述系统安全性,并给出了兼顾经济性与安全性的优化目标函数;然后,在充分考虑双回线结构IPFC控制特性的情况下建立了故障前后电力系统的等式/不等式约束;最后,针对所建立的强非线性安全约束经济调度优化模型,设计了基于粒子群算法的计算构架并实现了模型的求解。基于江苏电网的算例分析表明,利用该文方法获得的策略比基于传统方法获得的策略能更好地满足潮流安全约束,且准确地计及了IPFC的控制特性,具有较高的应用价值。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	吴熙
	陆瑶
	蔡晖
	王瑞
	陈晟

关键词 ：线间潮流控制器（IPFC）, 双回线控制特性, 风电场景, 经济调度

Abstract：Interline power flow controller (IPFC) proposed is a device with powerful power flow control ability, which provides a new method for power flow control under the increasing integration of large-scale renewable energy. In this paper, a security-constrained economic dispatching method for the power system with IPFC considering wind power uncertainty is proposed. Compared with the conventional method, the proposed method accurately considers the control characteristics of IPFC and can guarantee the security requirement under N-1 contingencies.
Firstly, the optimization objective function considering both economy and security is expressed as Equ. (1) in this paper. The wind power output scenarios are predicted based on MARKOV chain, and the security objective function is expressed risk index R, which can be expressed by Equ. (2) in this paper.
Furthermore, with full consideration of the control characteristics of IPFC with the double-circuit structure, the equality/inequality constraints of the power system before and after contingencies are established:
1) N-1 contingency occurs on either series side of the IPFC of the double-circuit line. At this time, the converter of the primary line on the fault side loses its control while the converter of the other primary line can still play control functions. Take the N-1 contingency on line nj is taken as an example. At this time, the mathematical expression of control characteristics are Equ.(11) and Equ.(12) in this paper.
2) N-1 contingency occurs on the non-IPFC series side. At this time, the power flow of the line controlled by IPFC remains unchanged before and after the fault. The mathematical expression is Equ. (13) in this paper.
Finally, an improved particle swarm optimization algorithm is designed to solve the proposed optimization model with strong nonlinear constraints. In this structure, inequality constraints are treated by penalty function and equality constraints are guaranteed by power flow calculation. The particle velocity and position are constantly updated, and the optimal solution can be obtained after several iterations, that is, the optimal control scheme. The flow chart based on PSO is shown in Fig.4 in this paper.
With the strategy obtained by the proposed method and the strategy without considering the IPFC control characteristics, the power flow in the Jiangsu power grid is compared, as shown in Fig.5 and Fig.6 respectively. It can be seen that the line load rate under the strategy obtained by the proposed method meets the security requirement whether the contingency occurs on the line controlled by IPFC or not. It indicates that the strategy obtained by the proposed method can meet the security requirement under N-1 contingencies and improve the static security of the system.
The two dispatching strategies obtained by single scenario optimization and the optimization method in this paper are respectively applied to all wind power uncertainty scenarios. The comparison results of the line overload condition of two strategies when serious N-1 contingencies occur in some wind power scenarios are shown in Tab.2 in this paper. Under the background of large-scale wind power integration, the dispatching strategy considering the wind power scenario can satisfy the security constraints of power flow while the single-scenario dispatching strategy cannot.

Key words： Interline power flow controller (IPFC) control characteristics for double-circuit wind power scenario economic dispatch

收稿日期: 2021-11-10

PACS:

TM732

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目（52177075）、江苏省自然科学基金项目（BK20221466）、国网江苏省电力有限公司科技项目“基于线间潮流控制的新型FACTS装置协调规划技术与系统级运行控制策略研究”（J2021015）资助

通讯作者: 吴熙男,1987年生,副教授,研究方向为电力系统优化。E-mail：wuxi@seu.edu.cn

作者简介: 陆瑶女,1998年生,硕士研究生,研究方向为电力系统优化。E-mail：luyao006@seu.edu.cn

引用本文:

吴熙, 陆瑶, 蔡晖, 王瑞, 陈晟. 计及风电不确定性的含线间潮流控制器的电力系统经济调度[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(3): 781-792. Wu Xi, Lu Yao, Cai Hui, Wang Rui, Chen Sheng. Economic Dispatching of Power System with Interline Power Flow Controller Considering Wind Power Uncertainty. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(3): 781-792.

链接本文:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.211809 https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/CN/Y2023/V38/I3/781

[1] Liu Pengcheng, Wang Zheng, Wei Sanmin, et al.Recent developments of modulation and control for high-power current-source-converters fed electric machine systems[J]. CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, 2020, 4(3): 215-226.
[2] Zhu Rongwu, Andresen M, Langwasser M, et al.Smart transformer/large flexible transformer[J]. CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, 2020, 4(4): 264-274.
[3] 薛翼程, 王国腾, 张哲任, 等. MMC-HVDC接入对同步发电机阻尼转矩的影响机理分析[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022, 46(9): 99-108.
Xue Yicheng, Wang Guoteng, Zhang Zheren, et al.Mechanism analysis of influence of MMC-HVDC integration on damping torque of synchronous generators[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46(9): 99-108.
[4] 韩建, 李幸, 罗德荣, 等. 基于双级矩阵变换器的统一潮流控制器并联侧无功扩展[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(7): 1498-1508.
Han Jian, Li Xing, Luo Derong, et al.Extending the reactive power range of shunt side for unified power flow controllers based on indirect matrix converters[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(7): 1498-1508.
[5] Palma-Behnke R, Vargas L S, Perez J R, et al.OPF with SVC and UPFC modeling for longitudinal systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(4): 1742-1753.
[6] Wu Xi, Zhou Zhengyu, Liu Gang, et al.Preventive security-constrained optimal power flow considering UPFC control modes[J]. Energies, 2017, 10(8): 1199.
[7] 李国庆, 宋莉, 李筱婧. 计及FACTS装置的可用输电能力计算[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2009, 29(19): 36-42.
Li Guoqing, Song Li, Li Xiaojing.Available transfer capability calculation considering FACTS controllers[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2009, 29(19): 36-42.
[8] Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Chen C.A novel power injection model of IPFC for power flow analysis inclusive of practical constraints[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2006, 21(4): 1550-1556.
[9] Jiang Xia, Chow J H, Edris A A, et al.Transfer path stability enhancement by voltage-sourced converter-based FACTS controllers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2010, 25(2): 1019-1025.
[10] Hingorani N, Gyuyi L.Combined compensators: unified power flow controller (UPFC) and interline power flow controller (IPFC)[M]. New York: IEEE Press, 2009.
[11] Rostami M, Lotfifard S.Optimal remedial actions in power systems considering wind farm grid codes and UPFC[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2020, 16(12): 7264-7274.
[12] Sreejith S, Simon S P, Selvan M P.Analysis of FACTS devices on security constrained unit commitment problem[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2015, 66: 280-293.
[13] Khodaei A, Shahidehpour M.Security-constrained transmission switching with voltage constraints[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2012, 35(1): 74-82.
[14] Naveen Kumar G, Surya Kalavathi M.Cat swarm optimization for optimal placement of multiple UPFC's in voltage stability enhancement under contingency[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2014, 57: 97-104.
[15] Eremia M, Liu C C, Edris A A.Advanced solutions in power systems[M]. New York: IEEE Press, 2016.
[16] Rao B S, Vaisakh K.Multi-objective adaptive clonal selection algorithm for solving optimal power flow considering multi-type FACTS devices and load uncertainty[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2014, 23: 286-297.
[17] Mishra A, Venkata Nagesh Kumar G. Congestion management of deregulated power systems by optimal setting of interline power flow controller using gravitational search algorithm[J]. Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 2017, 4(1): 198-212.
[18] 吴熙, 王亮, 陈曦, 等. 计及线间潮流控制器的电力系统潮流优化[J]. 电网技术, 2019, 43(11): 4125-4134.
Wu Xi, Wang Liang, Chen Xi, et al.Optimal power flow considering interline power flow controller[J]. Power System Technology, 2019, 43(11): 4125-4134.
[19] 麻秀范, 王戈, 朱思嘉, 等. 计及风电消纳与发电集团利益的日前协调优化调度[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(3): 579-587.
Ma Xiufan, Wang Ge, Zhu Sijia, et al.Coordinated day-ahead optimal dispatch considering wind power consumption and the benefits of power generation group[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(3): 579-587.
[20] 周博, 艾小猛, 方家琨, 等. 计及超分辨率风电出力不确定性的连续时间鲁棒机组组合[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(7): 1456-1467.
Zhou Bo, Ai Xiaomeng, Fang Jiakun, et al.Continuous-time modeling based robust unit commitment considering beyond-the-resolution wind power uncertainty[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(7): 1456-1467.
[21] 张大波, 朱志鹏, 连帅. 考虑发电计划的电网阻塞疏导UPFC配置研究[J]. 电气技术, 2018, 19(6): 14-19.
Zhang Dabo, Zhu Zhipeng, Lian Shuai.Allocation schemes research of UPFC based on relieving power blockage considering the power generation schedule[J]. Electrical Engineering, 2018, 19(6): 14-19.
[22] Ni M, McCalley J D, Vittal V, et al. Online risk-based security assessment[J]. IEEE Power Engineering Review, 2002, 22(11): 59.
[23] 朱晨曦, 张焰, 严正, 等. 采用改进马尔科夫链蒙特卡洛法的风电功率序列建模[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(3): 577-589.
Zhu Chenxi, Zhang Yan, Yan Zheng, et al.A wind power time series modeling method based on the improved Markov chain Monte Carlo method[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(3): 577-589.
[24] 杨林, 蔡晖, 汪惟源, 等. 500kV统一潮流控制器在苏州南部电网的工程应用[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(2): 47-53.
Yang Lin, Cai Hui, Wang Weiyuan, et al.Application of 500kV UPFC in Suzhou southern power grid[J]. Electric Power, 2018, 51(2): 47-53.
[25] 祁万春, 杨林, 宋鹏程, 等. 南京西环网UPFC示范工程系统级控制策略研究[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40(1): 92-96.
Qi Wanchun, Yang Lin, Song Pengcheng, et al.UPFC system control strategy research in Nanjing western power grid[J]. Power System Technology, 2016, 40(1): 92-96.
[26] 夏鹏, 刘文颖, 蔡万通, 等. 基于风电离散化概率序列的机会约束规划优化调度方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2018, 33(21): 5069-5079.
Xia Peng, Liu Wenying, Cai Wantong, et al.Optimal scheduling method of chance constrained programming based on discrete wind power probability sequences[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2018, 33(21): 5069-5079.
[27] Eremia M, Liu C C, Edris A A.Advanced solutions in power systems: HVDC, FACTS, and Artificial Intelligence[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
[28] 朱梓荣, 李群, 卫志农, 等. 含新型统一潮流控制器的电力系统安全校正模型[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019, 43(2): 58-66.
Zhu Zirong, Li Qun, Wei Zhinong, et al.Security correction model of power system with novel unified power flow controller[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019, 43(2): 58-66.
[29] 罗玉春, 王毅, 闪鑫, 等. 调控系统中统一潮流控制器稳态建模的实现[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50(1): 148-157.
Luo Yuchun, Wang Yi, Shan Xin, et al.Realization of steady state modeling of unified power flow controller in a control system[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50(1): 148-157.
[30] Galvani S, Hagh M T, Sharifian M B B, et al. Multiobjective predictability-based optimal placement and parameters setting of UPFC in wind power included power systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2019, 15(2): 878-888.
[31] Zhang X P.Modelling of the interline power flow controller and the generalised unified power flow controller in Newton power flow[J]. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2003, 150(3): 268.
[32] 金义雄, 程浩忠, 严健勇, 等. 改进粒子群算法及其在输电网规划中的应用[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2005, 25(4): 46-50, 70.
Jin Yixiong, Cheng Haozhong, Yan Jianyong, et al.Improved particle swarm optimization method and its application in power transmission network planning[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2005, 25(4): 46-50, 70.
[33] Sun Jingwen, Yun Zhihao, Liang Jun, et al.Wind power forecasting based on a Markov chain model of variation[C]//2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), Zhangjiajie, China, 2016: 778-782.