计及总损耗功率的电动汽车母线电容主动快速放电方法

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.222284

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (4636 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract

When electric vehicles (EVs) encounter an emergency, the dc-bus voltage of EVs equipped with the high-voltage drive system needs to be reduced to safe voltage (60 V) as soon as possible. To drop the dc-bus capacitor voltage to a safe voltage, a winding-based active discharge method was proposed. However, traditional active discharge based on PI controller has poor robustness, long discharge time, and low safety, which cannot meet the discharge requirements of the United Nation Vehicle Regulation ECCE R94. This paper proposes an active discharge method for EVs with total power loss to reduce the discharge time and enhance the robustness.
Firstly, the d-axis weakened current is calculated using the permanent magnet synchronous motor winding as the bleeding resistor. Then, the traditional active discharge method based on the PI controller is analyzed. Secondly, the dc-bus capacitor energy flow model is established. More importantly, the extended sliding mode observer (ESMO) is introduced to address long discharge time and poor robustness issues. The ESMO can observe the total loss, which consists of inverter loss, motor winding copper consumption, motor inductance energy storage, and other losses. The stability of ESMO is proved by the Lyapunov stability theory. Finally, observed total discharge loss can be feedforward compensated by the designed control law. Compared with the conventional discharge method, the influence of total power loss and motor speed on the dc-bus capacitor voltage is well suppressed, and the dc-bus capacitor voltage and motor speed are decoupled in the proposed strategy.
Experimental results show that the DC-bus voltage of the proposed method drops to a safe voltage within 0.2 s, faster than traditional active discharge method-based PI controller (1.2 s) and disturbance observer (0.3 s). In contrast, the discharge time is shorter with the active discharge method-based disturbance observer because the convergence rate is faster than the disturbance observer. The experiment with parameter mismatch proves that the parameter error can be observed and compensated by the ESMO. Furthermore, electric vehicle drive systems' power density and reliability are further improved by eliminating the complicated drain circuit.
The following conclusions can be obtained: (1) The traditional discharge method-based PI controller has the problem of changing the steady-state operating point with the motor speed, which could not meet the requirements of fast and safe discharge of the dc-bus capacitor in emergencies. (2) The discharge model with PMSM winding as the bleeding resistor is established, and the relationship between the dc-bus capacitor voltage and the total power loss of the system is deduced. Moreover, the observed total loss of the system can be feedforward compensated in the proposed discharge method, effectively suppressing the voltage pulsation when the dc-bus voltage reduces to the safe voltage. Hence, the discharge time is short, and the robustness and safety of the system are improved. (3) The simulation and experimental results show that the proposed control method for electric vehicles with total power loss estimation has strong robustness, high safety, strong practicability, and engineering application value.

Key words： Electric vehicle permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) estimated total power loss extended sliding mode observer DC-bus capacitor discharge

Received: 12 December 2022

PACS:

TM351

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zhang Xiaojun
	Yang Jiaqiang
	Zhou Yuchen

Cite this article:

Zhang Xiaojun,Yang Jiaqiang,Zhou Yuchen. Active Fast Discharge Method of Bus Capacitor for Electric Vehicle with Total Power Loss[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(6): 1737-1748.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.222284 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2024/V39/I6/1737

[1] 蒋栋, 高加楼, 李柏杨, 等. 电动汽车电机驱动系统零转矩充电复用技术简介[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(19): 4862-4871.
Jiang Dong, Gao Jialou, Li Boyang, et al.Introduction of integrated motor drive-charger technologies for electric vehicle with zero torque[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(19): 4862-4871.
[2] 刘洪, 阎峻, 葛少云, 等. 考虑多车交互影响的电动汽车与快充站动态响应[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40(20): 6455-6468.
Liu Hong, Yan Jun, Ge Shaoyun, et al.Dynamic response of electric vehicle and fast charging stations considering multi-vehicle interaction[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40(20): 6455-6468.
[3] Wang Wei, Chen Xinbo, Wang Junmin.Motor/generator applications in electrified vehicle chassis-a survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2019, 5(3): 584-601.
[4] 佟明昊, 程明, 许芷源, 等. 电动汽车用车载集成式充电系统若干关键技术问题及解决方案[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(24): 5125-5142.
Tong Minghao, Cheng Ming, Xu Zhiyuan, et al.Key issues and solutions of integrated on-board chargers for electric vehicles[J]. Transactions of China Elec- trotechnical Society, 2021, 36(24): 5125-5142.
[5] 张维煜, 杨恒坤, 朱熀秋. 电动汽车用飞轮电池关键技术和技术瓶颈分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(18): 5568-5581.
Zhang Weiyu, Yang Hengkun, Zhu Huangqiu.Key technologies and technical bottleneck analysis of flywheel battery systems for electric vehicle[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(18): 5568-5581.
[6] 陈卓易, 屈稳太. 基于PID型代价函数的永磁同步电机模型预测电流控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(14): 2971-2978.
Chen Zhuoyi, Qu Wentai.Model predictive current control for permanent magnet synchronous motors based on PID-type cost function[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(14): 2971-2978.
[7] 秦艳忠, 阎彦, 陈炜, 等. 永磁同步电机参数误差补偿-三矢量模型预测电流控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(2): 255-265.
Qin Yanzhong, Yan Yan, Chen Wei, et al.Three-vector model predictive current control strategy for permanent magnet synchronous motor drives with parameter error compensation[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(2): 255-265.
[8] 杨淑英, 储昭晗, 房佳禹, 等. 直接基于谐波电动势定向的PMSM转矩脉动抑制方案研究[J]. 电机与控制学报, 2022, 26(7): 68-80.
Yang Shuying, Chu Zhaohan, Fang Jiayu, et al.Suppression strategy of PMSM torque ripples directly based on harmonic EMF orientation[J]. Electric Machines and Control, 2022, 26(7): 68-80.
[9] Wang Qiwei, Wang Gaolin, Zhao Nannan, et al.An impedance model-based multiparameter identification method of PMSM for both offline and online con- ditions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2021, 36(1): 727-738.
[10] 章回炫, 范涛, 边元均, 等. 永磁同步电机高性能电流预测控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(17): 4335-4345.
Zhang Huixuan, Fan Tao, Bian Yuanjun, et al.Predictive current control strategy of permanent magnet synchronous motors with high performance[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(17): 4335-4345.
[11] Gong Chao, Hu Yihua, Gao Jinqiu, et al.Winding- based DC-bus capacitor discharge technique selection principles based on parametric analysis for EV- PMSM drives in post-crash conditions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2021, 36(3): 3551-3562.
[12] 周军, 朱博楠, 杨圣强, 等. 基于动态差值法的直流系统绝缘监测技术[J]. 电工技术学报, 2015, 30(1): 235-241.
Zhou Jun, Zhu Bonan, Yang Shengqiang, et al.Dynamic difference value method for insulation monitoring in DC system[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2015, 30(1): 235-241.
[13] Gong Chao, Liu Jinglin, Han Yaofei, et al.Safety of electric vehicles in crash conditions: a review of hazards to occupants, regulatory activities, and tech- nical support[J]. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2022, 8(3): 3870-3883.
[14] 韩利, 姚宏, 夏燕兰. 基于最大功率的VSI泄放电阻制动技术及应用[J]. 电力电子技术, 2012, 46(8): 83-85.
Han Li, Yao Hong, Xia Yanlan.A new braking control method for VSI based on maximal allowable braking resistance discharge power[J]. Power Elec- tronics, 2012, 46(8): 83-85.
[15] Meyer I J W, Tasky D P, Nayeem S M, et al. Passive high-voltage DC bus discharge circuit for a vehicle: U.S. 9018865.B2[P].2015-4-28.
[16] Ashida S, Yamada K, Nakamura M, et al. Electric vehicle and control apparatus in the event of frontal collision. circuit compliant power generation systems using induction machine: U.S. Patent 8631894.B2[P].2014-1-21.
[17] Gong Chao, Hu Yihua, Chen Guipeng, et al.A DC- bus capacitor discharge strategy for PMSM drive system with large inertia and small system safe current in EVs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2019, 15(8): 4709-4718.
[18] Yang Haolin, Yang Jiaqiang, Zhang Xiaojun.DC-bus capacitor maximum power discharge strategy for EV-PMSM drive system with small safe current[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 132158-132167.
[19] 张晓军, 杨家强, 杨昊林. 一种基于永磁同步电机绕组铜耗功率最大的电动汽车母线电容放电方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(17): 6460-6471.
Zhang Xiaojun, Yang Jiaqiang, Yang Haolin.A DC- bus capacitor discharge method based on maximum copper consumption power of permanent magnet synchronous motor windings in electric vehicles[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42(17): 6460-6471.
[20] Gong Chao, Hu Yihua, Li Wenzhen, et al.Hybrid DC-bus capacitor discharge strategy using internal windings and external bleeder for surface-mounted PMSM-based EV powertrains in emergency[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2021, 68(3): 1905-1915.
[21] 鲍晓华, 刘佶炜, 孙跃, 等. 低速大转矩永磁直驱电机研究综述与展望[J]. 电工技术学报, 2019, 34(6): 1148-1160.
Bao Xiaohua, Liu Jiwei, Sun Yue, et al.Review and prospect of low-speed high-torque permanent magnet machines[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2019, 34(6): 1148-1160.
[22] 刘宁, 夏长亮, 周湛清, 等. 基于比例增益补偿的永磁同步电机转速平滑控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2018, 33(17): 4007-4015.
Liu Ning, Xia Changliang, Zhou Zhanqing, et al.Smooth speed control for permanent magnet synchronous motor using proportional gain com- pensation[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2018, 33(17): 4007-4015.
[23] 张国强, 王高林, 徐殿国, 等. 基于单观测器误差信息融合的永磁电机无传感器复合控制策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2017, 37(20): 6077-6082.
Zhang Guoqiang, Wang Gaolin, Xu Dianguo, et al.Hybrid sensorless control based on single position observer using error combination for interior per- manent magnet synchronous machine drives[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2017, 37(20): 6077-6082.
[24] 刘旭东, 李珂, 张奇, 等. 基于非线性扰动观测器的永磁同步电机单环预测控制[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(7): 2153-2162, 2230.
Liu Xudong, Li Ke, Zhang Qi, et al.Single-loop predictive control of PMSM based on nonlinear disturbance observers[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(7): 2153-2162, 2230.
[25] Jung J, Lim S, Nam K.A feedback linearizing control scheme for a PWM converter-inverter having a very small DC-link capacitor[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 1999, 35(5): 1124-1131.
[26] Zhang Xiang, Yang Jiaqiang.A robust flywheel energy storage system discharge strategy for wide speed range operation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2017, 64(10): 7862-7873.
[27] 巩磊, 王萌, 祝长生. 基于浸入不变流形的飞轮储能系统母线电压自适应非线性控制器[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40(2): 623-634.
Gong Lei, Wang Meng, Zhu Changsheng.An adaptive nonlinear controller for the bus voltage based on immersion and invariance manifold in flywheel energy storage systems[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40(2): 623-634.
[28] Zhang Xiaoguang, Hou Benshuai, Mei Yang.Deadbeat predictive current control of permanent- magnet synchronous motors with stator current and disturbance observer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2017, 32(5): 3818-3834.
[29] Ali M, Yaqoob M, Cao Lingling, et al.Disturbance- observer-based DC-bus voltage control for ripple mitigation and improved dynamic response in two- stage single-phase inverter system[J]. IEEE Transa- ctions on Industrial Electronics, 2019, 66(9): 6836-6845.
[30] Zhou Sizhan, Liu Jinjun, Zhou Linyuan, et al.DQ current control of voltage source converters with a decoupling method based on preprocessed reference current feed-forward[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2017, 32(11): 8904-8921.
[31] Han Jingqing.From PID to active disturbance rejection control[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2009, 56(3): 900-906.
[32] Rabiei A, Thiringer T, Alatalo M, et al.Improved maximum-torque-per-ampere algorithm accounting for core saturation, cross-coupling effect, and temperature for a PMSM intended for vehicular applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2016, 2(2): 150-159.