考虑磁桥非线性的内置式永磁同步电机空载电磁性能通用解析模型

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.220486

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (5)

Download: PDF (4660 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Interior permanent magnet (IPM) motors, due to the high power/torque density and wide speed range, are widely used in industrial applications and smart homes. Considerable computation time is one of the major issues faced by designers due to the changeable rotor configurations. The finite element analysis (FEA) is widely used in motor design due to its ability to consider saturation and complex geometries. However, the need for high-precision mesh is time-consuming. The analytical method has acceptable accuracy and fast calculation, which is regarded as an effective tool by designers. However, the existing analytical models are not universal. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel general analytical model to predict the no-load performance of IPM motors with different topologies.
Firstly, the magnets with different topologies are equivalent according to the principle that the total flux produced by the magnets is constant, facilitating the establishment of subdomains. Secondly, based on the boundary conditions between different subdomains, the field governing equations can be obtained to solve the undetermined coefficients. Thirdly, the magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) method is employed to obtain the permeability of magnetic bridges to consider the effect of saturation and improve the calculation accuracy. Finally, the influence of slotting is considered based on the conformal mapping method to obtain the air-gap magnetic field of slotted motors. The proposed general model is suitable for V-shape, U-shape, and straight-shape IPM motors with any slot-pole combination. The computation time is greatly shortened compared with FEA because the equations to be solved are linear.
The calculated no-load air-gap flux density waveforms, back electromotive force (EMF), and cogging torque by the proposed model are in good agreement with those of FEA results. For the V-shape motor, the fundamental amplitudes of back EMF obtained by FEA, analytical model and experiment are 85.5 V, 86.2 V, and 84.8 V, respectively; the corresponding total harmonic distortions (THDs) are 2.57 %, 1.95 %, and 3.02 %, respectively. For the U-shape motor, the fundamental amplitudes of back EMF obtained by FEA and analytical model are 213.7 V and 215.9 V, respectively; the THDs are 4.98 % and 4.7 %, respectively. For the straight-shape motor, the fundamental amplitudes of back EMF obtained by FEA, analytical model and experiment are 318.7 V, 325.3 V, and 320.4 V, respectively; the THDs are 1.09 %, 1.62 %, and 1.55 %, respectively. The amplitudes of cogging torque for the V-shape motor calculated by FEA and analytical model are 368 mN·m and 403 mN·m, the calculation error is 9.5 %. The amplitudes of cogging torque for the U-shape motor are 609 mN·m and 584 mN·m, and the calculation error is 4.1 %. The amplitudes of cogging torque for the straight-shape motor are 57 mN·m and 51 mN·m, the calculation error is 10.5 %. The above results show that the model can effectively calculate the no-load performance of IPM motors with different rotor structures.
The following conclusions can be drawn from the above analysis: (1) Compared with FEA, the proposed general model can significantly reduce the computational cost since the calculation is based on linear equations rather than numerical iteration. (2) The proposed model has higher precision, and the errors between calculated and FEA results are within the allowable range of the engineering. (3) The proposed magnet equivalence method provides ideas for the analytical derivation of other types of IPM motors with irregular magnets arrangement, which brings convenience to the design and optimization of related types of motors.

Key words： Interior permanent magnet synchronous motors subdomain method magnetic equivalent circuit magnetic bridge saturation

Received: 02 April 2022

PACS:

TM351

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Li Shiqi
	Tong Wenming
	Jia Jianguo
	Tang Renyuan

Cite this article:

Li Shiqi,Tong Wenming,Jia Jianguo等. General Analytical Model of No-Load Electromagnetic Performance of Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors Considering Nonlinearity of Magnetic Bridges[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(6): 1421-1432.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.220486 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2023/V38/I6/1421

[1] 赵文祥, 刘桓, 陶涛, 等. 基于虚拟信号和高频脉振信号注入的无位置传感器内置式永磁同步电机MTPA控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(24): 5092-5100.
Zhao Wengxiang, Liu Huan, Tao Tao, et al.MTPA control of sensorless IPMSM based on virtual signal and high-frequency pulsating signal injection[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(24): 5092-5100.
[2] 赵方伟, 王秀和, 赵文良, 等. 内置式永磁同步电机动态偏心故障下的轴电压解析分析和削弱[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(4): 837-848.
Zhao Fangwei, Wang Xiuhe, Zhao Wenliang, et al.Analysis and reduction of shaft voltage in interior permanent magnet synchronous motors under dynamic eccentricity fault[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(4): 837-848.
[3] 顾理成, 陈前, 赵文祥, 等. 五相永磁容错电机的相间短路容错控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(8): 1972-1981.
Gu Licheng, Chen Qian, Zhao Wenxiang, et al.Inter-phase short-circuit fault-tolerant control for five-phase permanent magnet fault-tolerant motors[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(8): 1972-1981.
[4] 石玉君, 程子活, 蹇林旎. 两种典型的场调制型永磁电机的对比分析[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(1): 120-130.
Shi Yujun, Cheng Zihuo, Jian Linni.Comparative analysis of two typical field modulated permanent- magnet machines[J]. Transactions of China Electro- technical Society, 2021, 36(1): 120-130.
[5] 王明杰, 贾宛英, 张志艳, 等. 永磁直线同步电机空载反电动势和推力的解析计算[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(5): 954-963.
Wang Mingjie, Jia Wanying, Zhang Zhiyan, et al.Analytical calculation of no-load eletromotive force and thrust in permanent magnet linear synchronous motors[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(5): 954-963.
[6] Liu Feng, Wang Xiuhe, Xing Zezhi, et al.Reduction of cogging torque and electromagnetic vibration based on different combination of pole arc coefficient for interior permanent magnet synchronous machine[J]. CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, 2021, 5(4): 291-300.
[7] Zhu Ziqiang, Howe D.Instantaneous magnetic field distribution in brushless permanent magnet DC motors, part I: open-circuit field[J]. IEEE Transa- ctions on Magnetics, 1993, 29(1): 124-135.
[8] Zhu Ziqiang, Howe D.Instantaneous magnetic field distribution in brushless permanent magnet DC motors, part Ⅱ: armature-reaction field[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1993, 29(1): 136-142.
[9] 马霁旻, 王杜, 曲荣海, 等. 基于有取向硅钢的轴向磁通开关磁阻电机准三维解析分析与设计[J]. 电工技术学报, 2018, 33(17): 4069-4077.
Ma Jimin, Wang Du, Qu Ronghai, et al.Quasi- three-dimensional analysis and design of an axial flux switched reluctance motor based on grain oriented silicon steel[J]. Transactions of China Electro- technical Society, 2018, 33(17): 4069-4077.
[10] Zhang Zhen, Xia Changliang, Wang Huimin, et al.Analytical field calculation and analysis of surface inset permanent magnet machines with high saliency ratio[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2016, 52(12): 1-12.
[11] Xu Lei, Zhang Chao, Zhu Xiaoyong, et al.Indirect analytical modeling and analysis of V-shaped interior PM synchronous machine[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 173786-173795.
[12] Hajdinjak M, Miljavec D.Analytical calculation of the magnetic field distribution in slotless brushless machines with U-shaped interior permanent mag- nets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2020, 67(8): 6721-6731.
[13] Pourahmadi-Nakhli M, Rahideh A, Mardaneh M.Analytical 2-D model of slotted brushless machines with cubic spoke-type permanent magnets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2018, 33(1): 373-382.
[14] 赵玫, 于帅, 张华强. 聚磁式横向磁通永磁直线电机的变磁导等效磁网络[J]. 电机与控制学报, 2020, 24(4): 12-22.
Zhao Mei, Yu Shuai, Zhang Huaqiang.Variable permeability equivalent magnetic circuit network of flux-concentrated transverse flux permanent magnet linear machine[J]. Electric Machines and Control, 2020, 24(4): 12-22.
[15] He Mingjie, Li Weiye, Peng Jun, et al.Multi-layer quasi three-dimensional equivalent model of axial- flux permanent magnet synchronous machine[J]. CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, 2021, 5(1): 3-12.
[16] 陈威, 吴桂初, 方攸同. 基于绕组分布函数理论和动态磁网络的两种内置式永磁牵引电机解析建模方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(增刊2): 377-386.
Chen Wei, Wu Guichu, Fang Youtong.Two analytical models based on winding function theory and dynamic reluctance mesh for interior permanent magnet traction machines[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(S2): 377-386.
[17] Ding Ling, Liu Guohai, Chen Qian, et al.A novel mesh-based equivalent magnetic network for perfor- mance analysis and optimal design of permanent magnet machines[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2019, 34(3): 1337-1346.
[18] Liu Guohai, Wang Yong, Chen Qian, et al.Design and analysis of a new equivalent magnetic network model for IPM machines[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2020, 56(6): 1-12.
[19] Wu Shuang, Shi Tingna, Guo Liyan, et al.Accurate analytical method for magnetic field calculation of interior PM motors[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2021, 36(1): 325-337.
[20] Li Zhaokai, Huang Xiaoyan, Wu Lijian, et al.An improved hybrid field model for calculating on-load performance of interior permanent-magnet motors[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2021, 68(10): 9207-9217.
[21] Wu Shuang, Guo Liyan, Wang Huimin, et al.Indu- ctance calculation of interior permanent magnet machines considering asymmetrical saturation of the bridge[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2019, 55(11): 1-11.
[22] Farshadnia M, Cheema M A M, Dutta R, et al. Analytical modeling of armature reaction air-gap flux density considering the non-homogeneously saturated rotor in a fractional-slot concentrated-wound IPM machine[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2016, 53(2): 1-12.
[23] Liang Peixin, Chai Feng, Bi Yunlong, et al.Analyti- cal model and design of spoke-type permanent- magnet machines accounting for saturation and nonlinearity of magnetic bridges[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2016, 417: 389-396.
[24] Liang Peixin, Chai Feng, Li Yi, et al.Analytical prediction of magnetic field distribution in spoke-type permanent-magnet synchronous machines accounting for bridge saturation and magnet shape[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2017, 64(5): 3479-3488.
[25] Liang Peixin, Chai Feng, Chen Lei, et al.Analytical prediction of no-load stator iron losses in spoke-type permanent-magnet synchronous machines[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2018, 33(1): 252-259.
[26] Zhang Zhen, Xia Changliang, Yan Yan, et al.A hybrid analytical model for open-circuit field calculation of multilayer interior permanent magnet machines[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2017, 435: 136-145.
[27] An Yuansheng, Ma Conggan, Zhang N, et al.Open- circuit air-gap magnetic field calculation of interior permanent magnet synchronous motor with V-shaped segmented skewed poles using hybrid analytical method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2021, 57(12): 1-9.
[28] Faradonbeh V Z, Rahideh A, Boroujeni S T, et al.2-D analytical no-load electromagnetic model for slotted interior permanent magnet synchronous machines[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2021, 36(4): 3118-3126.
[29] Li Shiqi, Tong Wenming, Hou Mingjun, et al.Analytical model for no-load electromagnetic perfor- mance prediction of V-shape IPM motors considering nonlinearity of magnetic bridges[J]. IEEE Transa- ctions on Energy Conversion, 2022, 37(2): 901-911.
[30] Lim D K, Yi K P, Woo D K, et al.Analysis and design of a multi-layered and multi-segmented interior permanent magnet motor by using an analytic method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2014, 50(6): 1-8.
[31] Zarko D, Ban D, Lipo T A.Analytical calculation of magnetic field distribution in the slotted air gap of a surface permanent-magnet motor using complex relative air-gap permeance[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2006, 42(7): 1828-1837.