机械应力下取向硅钢片动态损耗特性测量与模拟

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.250143

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (7514 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The grain-oriented (GO) silicon steel sheets, which constitute the core of a power transformer, are inevitably subjected to stress during processing, stacking, and operation. The mechanical stress affects the dynamic loss characteristics of the GO silicon steel sheets. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct relevant research on the dynamic loss characteristics of GO silicon steel sheets under mechanical stress.
The existing problems of the dynamic loss model of GO silicon steel sheets under stress can be summarized as follows. Firstly, the current models have a good applicability in simulating the dynamic loss of non-oriented silicon steel sheets under stress. Still, they have poor applicability to GO electrical steel sheets. Secondly, the parameter identification depends on the experimental values measured under a particular stress, which is likely to lead to overfitting. As a result, the errors of the calculated loss under a specific stress are minor, but the errors are substantial under other stresses. Thirdly, it is also necessary to study the stress dependence of eddy current loss and residual loss.
Therefore, this paper proposes a dynamic loss model considering the stress effect for GO silicon steel sheets. A measurement platform is set up. The magnetic properties and dynamic loss characteristics of soft magnetic materials under mechanical stress are measured, as well as the static hysteresis and dynamic loss characteristics of GO silicon steel sheets. Based on the energetic model, taking into account the stress-induced additional energy, the magnetic field strength under stress can be expressed as the superposition of the magnetic field strength without stress and the stress-induced additional magnetic field strength. The stress-induced additional magnetic field strength accounts for the effects of the same stress on different magnetic densities and the nonlinear effects of stress. Therefore, the static hysteresis model, which considers stress, can simulate the static hysteresis loss of GO silicon steel sheets under various stresses. The electrical conductivity only depends on the composition of the material itself. Thus, the influence of stress on the eddy current loss of GO silicon steel sheets can be ignored. Subsequently, considering that stress changes the structure of magnetic domains within GO silicon steel sheets, the relationship between the residual loss parameter V₀ and the stress is analyzed. Accordingly, the residual loss under different stresses can be calculated, and the dynamic loss of GO silicon steel sheets under different stresses can be obtained.
Experimental verification indicates that the dynamic loss errors of the GO silicon steel sheets with two different grades are both within 10%, which verifies the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed model. The proposed model does not exhibit easy overfitting problems in parameter identification and can accurately calculate the dynamic losses of GO silicon steel sheets under various stresses.

Key words： Grain-oriented silicon steel sheets stress dynamic loss loss separation method

Received: 21 January 2025

PACS:

TM271

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Fu Yuheng
	Li Lin

Cite this article:

Fu Yuheng,Li Lin. Measurement and Simulation Methods of Dynamic Loss Characteristics of Grain-Oriented Silicon Steel Sheets under Mechanical Stress[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2026, 41(2): 359-373.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.250143 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2026/V41/I2/359

[1] 工业和信息化部, 市场监管总局, 国家能源局. 变压器能效提升计划(2021—2023年)[B]. 2020.
[2] Gürbüz I T, Martin F, Aydin U, et al.Experimental characterization of the effect of uniaxial stress on magnetization and iron losses of electrical steel sheets cut by punching process[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2022, 549: 168983.
[3] 朱育莹, 李琳. 考虑各向异性和模型参数应力依赖关系的改进Sablik-Jiles-Atherton磁滞模型[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(17): 4586-4596.
Zhu Yuying, Li Lin.An improved Sablik-Jiles- Atherton hysteresis model considering anisotropy and stress dependence of model parameters[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(17): 4586-4596.
[4] Liu Mingyong, Hubert O, Mininger X, et al.Redu- ction of power transformer core noise generation due to magnetostriction-induced deformations using fully coupled finite-element modeling optimization pro- cedures[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2017, 53(8): 8400511.
[5] 陈昊, 李琳. 非晶合金-取向硅钢组合铁心结构设计及其磁-振动特性分析[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(10): 2925-2936.
Chen Hao, Li Lin.Structure design and magnetic- vibration characteristics analysis of amorphous alloy and oriented silicon steel composite iron core[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(10): 2925-2936.
[6] Ben Tong, An Ni, Chen Long, et al.An improved stress-dependent magnetostriction model of silicon steel based on simplified multi-scale and Jiles-Atherton theory[J]. AIP Advances, 2024, 14(1): 015232.
[7] Singh D, Rasilo P, Martin F, et al.Effect of mechanical stress on excess loss of electrical steel sheets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2015, 51(11): 1001204.
[8] Permiakov V, Dupré L, Pulnikov A, et al.Loss separation and parameters for hysteresis modelling under compressive and tensile stresses[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2004, 272: 553-554.
[9] Rasilo P, Singh D, Aydin U, et al.Modeling of hysteresis losses in ferromagnetic laminations under mechanical stress[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2015, 52(3): 7300204.
[10] Daniel L.An analytical model for the effect of multiaxial stress on the magnetic susceptibility of ferromagnetic materials[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2013, 49(5): 2037-2040.
[11] Sai R B, Baghel A P S, Kulkarni S V, et al. A frequency-dependent scalar magneto-elastic hysteresis model derived using multi-scale and Jiles-Atherton approaches[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2020, 56(3): 7510105.
[12] 贲彤, 安妮, 陈龙, 等. 基于改进多尺度动态J-A模型的无取向硅钢磁致伸缩特性模拟[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45(11): 4514-4526.
Ben Tong, An Ni, Chen Long, et al.Simulation of magnetostrictive properties of non-oriented silicon steel based on improved multiscale dynamic J-A model[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45(11): 4514-4526.
[13] 贲彤, 孔玉琪, 陈龙, 等. 考虑磁畴偏转的无取向硅钢应力各向异性磁致伸缩特性模拟[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(4): 935-946.
Ben Tong, Kong Yuqi, Chen Long, et al.Simulation of stress-induced anisotropic magnetostrictive pro- perties of non-oriented silicon steel considering magnetic domain deflection[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(4): 935-946.
[14] 李梦星, 张艳丽, 姜伟, 等. 机械应力下电工钢片磁滞与磁致伸缩回环滞后特性模拟[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(11): 2698-2706.
Li Mengxing, Zhang Yanli, Jiang Wei, et al.Simulation of hysteresis and magnetostrictive loop hysteretic characteristics of electrical steel sheets under mechanical stress[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(11): 2698-2706.
[15] 李永建, 李宗明, 利雅婷, 等. 考虑磁-力耦合效应的混合磁滞模型研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(22): 6941-6951.
Li Yongjian, Li Zongming, Li Yating, et al.Study of hybrid hysteresis model considering magnetic-force coupling effect[J]. Transactions of China Electro- technical Society, 2024, 39(22): 6941-6951.
[16] 陈昊, 李琳, 刘洋. 基于Energetic模型的机械应力作用下电工钢片磁滞特性模拟[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(12): 3101-3111.
Chen Hao, Li Lin, Liu Yang.Simulation of magnetic hysteresis characteristics of electrical steel sheet under mechanical stress based on energetic model[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(12): 3101-3111.
[17] Ouazib A, Domenjoud M, Fagan P, et al.Effect of tension and compression stress on the magnetic losses in a low-carbon steel[J]. IEEE Transactions on Mag- netics, 2024, 60(9): 2001105.
[18] Perevertov O.Influence of the applied elastic tensile and compressive stress on the hysteresis curves of Fe-3%Si non-oriented steel[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2017, 428: 223-228.
[19] Perevertov O, Schäfer R.Influence of applied tensile stress on the hysteresis curve and magnetic domain structure of grain-oriented Fe-3%Si steel[J]. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2014, 47(18): 185001.
[20] Fu Yuheng, Li Lin.Modeling and analysis of stress sensitivity and changing trend of magnetization characteristics of GO silicon steel cut along different angles to the rolling direction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2024, 60(3): 2000405.
[21] Baghel A P S, Blumenfeld J B, Santandrea L, et al. Effect of mechanical stress on different core loss components along orthogonal directions in electrical steels[J]. Electrical Engineering, 2019, 101(3): 845-853.
[22] Bertotti G.Physical interpretation of eddy current losses in ferromagnetic materials. I. theoretical considerations[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1985, 57(6): 2110-2117.
[23] 付裕恒, 李琳. 计及压应力对磁场强度各分量影响的无取向硅钢磁弹性耦合动态磁滞模型[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45(7): 2832-2845.
Fu Yuheng, Li Lin.Magnetoelastic coupled dynamic hysteresis model of non-oriented silicon steel sheet considering the influence of compressive stress on components of magnetic field strength[J]. Pro- ceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45(7): 2832-2845.
[24] Perevertov O, Schäfer R.Magnetic properties and magnetic domain structure of grain-oriented Fe-3%Si steel under compression[J]. Materials Research Express, 2016, 3(9): 096103.
[25] Hauser H.Energetic model of ferromagnetic hysteresis[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1994, 75(5): 2584-2597.
[26] Ali K, Atallah K, Howe D.Prediction of mechanical stress effects on the iron loss in electrical machines[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1997, 81(8): 4119-4121.
[27] Karthaus J, Elfgen S, Leuning N, et al.Iron loss components dependent on mechanical compressive and tensile stress in non-oriented electrical steel[J]. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 2019, 59(1): 255-261.
[28] Liu Ren, Li Lin.Calculation method of magnetic material losses under DC bias using statistical loss theory and energetic hysteresis model[J]. IEEE Transa- ctions on Magnetics, 2019, 55(10): 7501404.