|
|
|
| An Energy Monitoring Method for the Hybrid Commutation Converter Arrester Based on the Calculation and Analysis of the Bridge Arm Current |
| Zhao Pengbo1,2, Yu Zhanqing2,3, Wei Xiaoguang2, Yuan Zhichang2,3, Wang Xiaohua1 |
1. State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment Xi’an Jiaotong University Xi’an 710049 China; ;
2. Beijing Huairou Laboratory Beijing 101400 China;
3. Department of Electrical Engineering Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 China |
|
|
|
Abstract Existing controllable commutation converters and hybrid commutation converters mainly dissipate energy through arresters when turning off large currents. However, repeatedly interrupting large currents may cause the arresters to overheat and be damaged. Therefore, it is crucial to monitor and protect the energy of converter valve arresters. Both traditional LCC and CLCC employ a monitoring scheme that counts arrester operations. However, in actual operating conditions, the arrester's single energy accumulation varies across different faults. The scheme that uses the maximum number of operations cannot fully utilize the arrester's remaining energy, reducing the number of possible turn-offs. Therefore, this paper proposes a method to invert the bridge arm current from off-valve current measurements, enabling precise monitoring of arrester energy accumulation across different turn-off currents.
First, based on the corresponding relationship between the AC side current and the bridge arm current of the HCC converter valve during steady-state operation and grid-side faults, a method for bridge arm current calculation is proposed by identifying the conducting bridge arm through the valve control CP signal, and the effective conditions are analyzed. Subsequently, the distribution law of the bridge arm transient current is investigated under various current turn-off conditions. The turn-off current is divided into three states according to whether the arrester operates and whether the dynamic buffer circuit RC is fully charged. Finally, based on the current distribution law, arrester energy calculation methods for different turn-off currents are derived, enabling effective monitoring of arrester energy.
Based on the relevant parameters of the Lingbao Project, the PSCAD simulation results for the HCC converter valve indicate that when the turn-off current is less than 213 A, the arrester does not operate, and no energy is accumulated. When the turn-off current is between 213 A and 1 428 A, the arrester operates, but the voltage across the buffer-circuit capacitor C does not reach the arrester operating voltage. When the turn-off current is 1 428 A, the voltage across the buffer circuit capacitor reaches the arrester operating voltage, and the energy consumption is maximized. The RTDS test results show that for a 100 ms single-phase ground fault, the average turn-off current is 0.96 kA, the error monitored by the proposed method is 2.2%, and the energy absorbed by the arrester after 6 consecutive turn-offs accounts for only 4.02% of the total energy. For a 100 ms three-phase metallic ground fault, the average turn-off current is 3.75 kA; the monitoring error of the proposed method is 2.27%, and the energy absorbed by the arrester after 6 consecutive active turn-offs accounts for 51.1% of the total energy.
According to the simulation and RTDS tests, the following conclusions are drawn. (1) There is a corresponding relationship between the AC side current and the bridge arm current of the HCC converter valve during steady-state operation and grid-side faults, and the valve control CP can be used for bridge arm current calculation. (2) During the active turn-off of the HCC converter valve, the current transfer characteristics of the bridge arm differ when turning off different currents. Arrester energy accumulation can be divided into three stages based on whether the arrester operates and whether the buffer-circuit capacitor reaches its maximum voltage. (3) Due to differences in the number of faulty phases and the degree of voltage drop, the active turn-off current of HCC varies slightly. Still, the monitoring error of the proposed method does not exceed 5% under various faults. With this method, the remaining energy of the arrester after dealing with a 100 ms single-phase ground fault is increased from 0 to a maximum of 95.98%, which significantly improves the energy utilization level of the arrester.
|
|
Received: 04 June 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 赵婉君. 高压直流输电工程技术[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2011.
[2] 王祥宇, 辛焕海, 傅闯, 等. 考虑实际工况的新能源经MMC-HVDC送出系统强度评估方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2025, 40(15): 4709-4721.
Wang Xiangyu, Xin Huanhai, Fu Chuang, et al.Strength assessment method of new energy delivery system via MMC-HVDC considering actual working conditions[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2025, 40(15): 4709-4721.
[3] 魏晓光, 单云海, 唐新灵. 高压直流输电技术发展现状及趋势[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45(22): 8937-8957.
Wei Xiaoguang, Shan Yunhai, Tang Xinling.The current situation and trend of high-voltage direct current transmission technology development[J]. Pro-ceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45(22): 8937-8957.
[4] 郑乐, 吴晶, 徐衍会, 等. HVDC送端系统振荡引发受端换相失败的机理分析[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(9): 2743-2754.
Zheng Yue, Wu Jing, Xu Yanhui, et al.Mechanism analysis of HVDC sender system oscillation triggering phase change failure at the receiver end[J]. Transa-ctions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(9): 2743-2754.
[5] 朱海, 郝亮亮, 和敬涵, 等. HVDC送端交流系统故障引起换相失败的机理分析[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(16): 4465-4478.
Zhu Hai, Hao Liangliang, He Jinghan, et al.Mechanism analysis of phase change failure caused by faults in HVDC feeder AC system[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(16): 4465-4478.
[6] 汪娟娟, 郑睿娜, 傅闯, 等. 基于逆变站动态无功控制的后续换相失败抑制方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(17): 4672-4682.
Wang Juanjuan, Zheng Ruina, Fu Chuang, et al.Subsequent phase change failure suppression method based on dynamic reactive power control at inverter station[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(17): 4672-4682.
[7] 汤广福, 罗湘, 魏晓光. 多端直流输电与直流电网技术[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2013, 33(10): 8-17.
Tang Guangfu, Luo Xiang, Wei Xiaoguang.Multi-terminal HVDC and DC-grid technology[J] Pro-ceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(10): 8-17.
[8] 陈龙龙, 王峰瀛, 张闻闻, 等. 直流输电用大功率逆阻型IGCT器件关键技术研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43(12): 4708-4716.
Chen Longlong, Wang Fengying, Zhang Wenwen, et al.Research on key technology of high power reverse-blocking IGCT device for HVDC trans-mission[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43(12): 4708-4716.
[9] 陈龙龙, 徐飞, 魏晓光, 等. 大容量可控关断的直流输电用电流源型换流器研究综述[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(1): 25-36.
Chen Longlong, Xu Fei, Wei Xiaoguang, et al.A review on large capacity controllable switching current source converter research[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(1): 25-36.
[10] 贺之渊, 高冲, 叶洪波, 等. 可控换相换流器研制及其工程应用[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2024, 48(19): 181-191.
He Zhiyuan, Gao Chong, Ye Hongbo, et al.Development and engineering application of controllable com-mutation converter[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2024, 48(19): 181-191.
[11] 高冲, 盛财旺, 王蒲瑞, 等. 可控换相换流阀可控关断试验研究及工程应用[J]. 电网技术, 2025, 49(1): 408-416.
Gao Chong, Sheng Caiwang, Wang Purui, et al.Experimental research and engineering application of controllable turn-off of controllable commutation converter valve[J]. Power System Technology, 2025, 49(1): 408-416.
[12] 曾嵘, 赵彪, 余占清, 等. 新一代高韧性直流输电技术(一): 从器件、装备到系统[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2024, 44(18): 7321-7334.
Zeng Rong, Zhao Biao, Yu Zhanqing, et al.A new generation of high-toughness HVDC technology (I): From devices, equipment to systems[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2024, 44(18): 7321-7334.
[13] 周文鹏, 曾嵘, 赵彪, 等. 大容量全控型压接式IGBT和IGCT器件对比分析: 原理、结构、特性和应用[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(8): 2940-2957.
Zhou Wenpeng, Zeng Rong, Zhao Biao, et al.Com-parative analysis of large-capacity fully controlled crimped IGBT and IGCT devices: principle, structure, characteristics and applications[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42(8): 2940-2957.
[14] 曾嵘, 赵彪, 余占清, 等. IGCT在直流电网中的应用展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(15): 4307-4317.
Zeng Rong, Zhao Biao, Yu Zhanqing, et al.Appli-cation prospect of IGCT in DC power grid[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(15): 4307-4317.
[15] 王宗泽, 余占清, 徐超群, 等. 新型IGCT直流输电换流阀运行试验研究及其等效性评估[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2024, 44(10): 4112-4122.
Wang Zongze, Yu Zhanqing, Xu Chaoqun, et al.Operation test and equivalence evaluaion of a novel IGCT DC converter[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2024, 44(10): 4112-4122.
[16] 王以璇, 魏晓光, 张闻闻, 等. 混合换相换流系统交流故障输送功率提升策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45(11): 4405-4417.
Wang Yixuan, Wei Xiaoguang, Zhang Wenwen, et al.Transmission power increase strategy for hybrid commutation converter system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45(11): 4405-4417.
[17] 冯健, 屈鲁, 余占清, 等. HCC换流阀恢复期暂态正向电压试验方法研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45(11): 4418-4430.
Feng Jian, Qu Lu, Yu Zhanqing, et al.Research on transient forward voltage test method of HCC con-verter valve during recovery period[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45(11): 4418-4430.
[18] 郭家晨. 换流变阀侧避雷器在线监测方法研究[D].哈尔滨: 哈尔滨理工大学, 2015.
Guo Jiachen.Research on on-line monitoring method of arrester on the side of rheological valve[D]. Harbin: Harbin University of Science and Technology, 2015.
[19] 何慧雯, 严飞, 尹婷, 等. 特高压交流110kV并联电容器组相对地过电压研究及避雷器能量选择[J]. 高电压技术, 2016, 42(8): 2618-2624.
He Huiwen, Yan Fei, Yin Ting, et al.Research on relative ground overvoltage of UHV AC 110kV shunt capacitor bank and energy selection of arrester[J]. High Voltage, 2016, 42(8): 2618-2624.
[20] Bhurat P, Vasudev N, Meera K S.Surge arresters for ultra high voltage transmission system-a review[C]//2016 International Conference on Electrical Power and Energy Systems (ICEPES), Bhopal, India, 2017: 295-300.
[21] Ren Hongtao, Zhang Ying.Study on energy absorption characteristics of 220 kV cable end arrester[C]//2021 3rd Asia Energy and Electrical Engineering Symposium (AEEES), Chengdu, China, 2021: 156-160.
[22] 何雨微, 司文荣, 魏本刚, 等. 考虑吸收能量估算的金属氧化物避雷器模型准确性分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2017, 37(10): 3019-3027.
He Yuwei, Si Wenrong, Wei Bengang, et al.Accuracy analysis of metal oxide arrester model considering absorption energy estimation[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2017, 37(10): 3019-3027. |
|
|
|
2026, Vol. 41 
