基于改进开路电压模型和自适应平方根无迹卡尔曼滤波的锂离子电池宽温度多工况SOC估计

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.231889

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1864 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Accurately estimating lithium-ion batteries’ state of charge (SOC) is critical. While existing research primarily focuses on optimizing battery models, parameter identification, and filtering algorithms, this paper introduces an open-circuit voltage (OCV) model. Firstly, an innovative OCV-SOC mapping correction strategy is designed for a wide temperature range. Additionally, an open-circuit voltage model based on support vector machine regression (SVR) is developed to accurately capture varying behaviors of batteries at different temperatures, thereby enhancing the stability, robustness, and initial error correction capability of SOC estimation. The impact of various Kalman filter algorithms and OCV models on SOC estimation across a wide temperature range and multiple working conditions is discussed. By integrating a second-order RC equivalent circuit model, dynamic forgetting factor recursive least squares (DFFRLS), and adaptive square root unscented Kalman filter (ASRUKF), the proposed approach achieves SOC-accurate estimation.
In the wide temperature range tests of the non-complex conditions, the SOC estimation based on ASRUKF achieves a maximum error, mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE) of below 0.94%. In contrast, at 0℃ or lower temperatures, SOC estimations based on unscented Kalman filter (UKF) and square root unscented Kalman filter (SRUKF) reach an RMSE of 2.36%. Under complex conditions across a wide temperature range, all three filtering algorithms’ maximum RMSE and MAE exceed 3%. Although the estimation time of SVR lags by 0.3 seconds behind extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and polynomial regression (PR), indicating a more complex computational process, it remains within acceptable bounds for real-time SOC applications. With an initial deviation of 20%, the SOC estimation based on SVR upholds an RMSE and MAE below 1.8% across a wide temperature range and multiple working conditions, ensuring that errors are contained within 1.2% under the non-complex operating conditions and below 4.3% under the complex operating condition. At 0℃ or lower ambient temperatures, the accuracy of SOC estimation under the complex condition based on PR significantly deteriorates, with both RMSE and MAE exceeding 3%. The SOC estimation based on XGBoost completely diverges under complex condition across a wide temperature range.
Results: (1) UKF, SRUKF, and ASRUKF display the potential to adjust initial discrepancies in fluctuating temperatures and operational conditions. ASRUKF is better at showing the mitigating divergence towards the estimation process's end. (2) OCV models are unsuitable for state-space model-based methods in SOC estimation. Improving and establishing high-accuracy OCV models can effectively enhance the performance of state-space model-based methods. (3) The proposed method achieves real-time, high-accuracy SOC estimation across a wide temperature range and multiple working conditions without significantly increasing algorithmic complexity, exhibiting strong stability, robustness, and initial error correction capability.

Key words： Lithium-ion battery state of charge open-circuit voltage model support vector machine regression Kalman filter wide temperature multiple working condition

Received: 13 November 2023

PACS:

TM91

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Wang Xindong
	Dong Zheng
	Wang Shuhua
	Jing Feng
	Zou Bing

Cite this article:

Wang Xindong,Dong Zheng,Wang Shuhua等. State-of-Charge Estimation for Lithium-Ion Batteries Across Wide Temperature Range and Multiple Working Conditions Based on Improved Open-Circuit Voltage Model and Adaptive Square Root Unscented Kalman Filter Algorithm[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(24): 7950-7964.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.231889 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2024/V39/I24/7950

[1] 侯金鸣, 孙蔚, 肖晋宇, 等. 电力系统关键技术进步与低碳转型的协同优化[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022, 46(13): 1-9.
Hou Jinming, Sun Wei, Xiao Jinyu, et al.Colla-borative optimization of key technology progress and low-carbon transition of power systems[J]. Auto-mation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46(13): 1-9.
[2] Yang Zhijie, Huang Haibo, Lin Feng.Sustainable electric vehicle batteries for a sustainable world: perspectives on battery cathodes, environment, supply chain, manufacturing, life cycle, and policy[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2022, 12(26): 2200383.
[3] Meng Jinhao, Ricco M, Luo Guangzhao, et al.An overview and comparison of online implementable SOC estimation methods for lithium-ion battery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2018, 54(2): 1583-1591.
[4] Pillai P, Sundaresan S, Kumar P, et al.Open-circuit voltage models for battery management systems: a review[J]. Energies, 2022, 15(18): 6803.
[5] 赵靖英, 胡劲, 张雪辉, 等. 基于锂电池模型和分数阶理论的SOC-SOH联合估计[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(17): 4551-4563.
Zhao Jingying, Hu Jin, Zhang Xuehui, et al.Joint estimation of the SOC-SOH based on lithium battery model and fractional order theory[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(17): 4551-4563.
[6] Maheshwari A, Nageswari S.Real-time state of charge estimation for electric vehicle power batteries using optimized filter[J]. Energy, 2022, 254: 124328.
[7] Wang Shunli, Takyi-Aninakwa P, Jin Siyu, et al.An improved feedforward-long short-term memory modeling method for the whole-life-cycle state of charge prediction of lithium-ion batteries considering current-voltage-temperature variation[J]. Energy, 2022, 254: 124224.
[8] 刘素贞, 陈云龙, 张闯, 等. 融合多维超声时频域特征的锂离子电池荷电状态估计[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(17): 4539-4550, 4563.
Liu Suzhen, Chen Yunlong, Zhang Chuang, et al.State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries fused with multi-dimensional ultrasonic time-frequency domain features[J]. Transactions of China Electro-technical Society, 2023, 38(17): 4539-4550, 4563.
[9] 冯飞, 逯仁贵, 朱春波. 一种锂离子电池低温SOC估计算法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2014, 29(7): 53-58.
Feng Fei, Lu Rengui, Zhu Chunbo.State of charge estimation of Li-ion battery at low temperature[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2014, 29(7): 53-58.
[10] Ul Hassan M, Saha S, Haque M E, et al.A comprehensive review of battery state of charge estimation techniques[J]. Sustainable Energy Tech-nologies and Assessments, 2022, 54: 102801.
[11] 王子毅, 朱承治, 周杨林, 等. 基于动态可重构电池网络的OCV-SOC在线估计[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(8): 2919-2928, 11.
Wang Ziyi, Zhu Chengzhi, Zhou Yanglin, et al.OCV-SOC estimation based on dynamic reconfi-gurable battery network[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42(8): 2919-2928, 11.
[12] 李宁, 何复兴, 马文涛, 等. 基于经验模态分解的门控循环单元神经网络的锂离子电池荷电状态估计[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(17): 4528-4536.
Li Ning, He Fuxing, Ma Wentao, et al.State-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion battery based on gated recurrent unit using empirical mode decom-position[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(17): 4528-4536.
[13] Badachi C, Green R C.A review on data-driven SOC estimation with Li-ion batteries: implementation methods & future aspirations[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 72: 108420.
[14] Hossain M, Haque M E, Arif M T.Kalman filtering techniques for the online model parameters and state of charge estimation of the Li-ion batteries: a comparative analysis[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 51: 104174.
[15] Zhou Wenlu, Zheng Yanping, Pan Zhengjun, et al.Review on the battery model and SOC estimation method[J]. Processes, 2021, 9(9): 1685.
[16] Liu Shengyong, Deng Dan, Wang Shunli, et al.Dynamic adaptive square-root unscented Kalman filter and rectangular window recursive least square method for the accurate state of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 67: 107603.
[17] 申江卫, 高承志, 舒星, 等. 基于迁移模型的锂离子电池宽温度全寿命SOC与可用容量联合估计[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(11): 3052-3063.
Shen Jiangwei, Gao Chengzhi, Shu Xing, et al.Joint estimation of wide temperature life SOC and available capacity of lithium-ion battery based on migration model[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(11): 3052-3063.
[18] 贠祥, 张鑫, 王超, 等. 基于联合参数辨识的粒子群优化扩展粒子滤波的锂电池荷电状态估计[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(2): 595-606.
Yun Xiang, Zhang Xin, Wang Chao, et al.State of charge estimation of Li-ion battery using particle swarm optimization extended Kalman particle filter based on joint parameter identification[J]. Transa-ctions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(2): 595-606.
[19] Zhang Kaixuan, Xiong Rui, Li Qiang, et al.A novel pseudo-open-circuit voltage modeling method for accurate state-of-charge estimation of LiFePO4 batteries[J]. Applied Energy, 2023, 347: 121406.
[20] Selvaraj V, Vairavasundaram I.A comprehensive review of state of charge estimation in lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 72: 108777.
[21] Adaikkappan M, Sathiyamoorthy N.Modeling, state of charge estimation, and charging of lithium-ion battery in electric vehicle: a review[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2022, 46(3): 2141-2165.
[22] Zhang Ruifeng, Xia Bizhong, Li Baohua, et al.A study on the open circuit voltage and state of charge characterization of high capacity lithium-ion battery under different temperature[J]. Energies, 2018, 11(9): 2408.
[23] 孙金磊, 邹鑫, 顾浩天, 等. 基于FFRLS-EKF联合算法的锂离子电池荷电状态估计方法[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(4): 505-513.
Sun Jinlei, Zou Xin, Gu Haotian, et al.State of charge estimation for lithium-ion battery based on FFRLS-EKF joint algorithm[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2022, 44(4): 505-513.
[24] Shrivastava P, Soon T K, Bin Idris M Y I, et al. Combined state of charge and state of energy estimation of lithium-ion battery using dual forgetting factor-based adaptive extended Kalman filter for electric vehicle applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2021, 70(2): 1200-1215.
[25] Xing Yinjiao, He Wei, Pecht M, et al.State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using the open-circuit voltage at various ambient tempera-tures[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 113: 106-115.
[26] Zheng Fangdan, Xing Yinjiao, Jiang Jiuchun, et al.Influence of different open circuit voltage tests on state of charge online estimation for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 183: 513-525.
[27] Feng Fei, Lu Rengui, Zhu Chunbo.A combined state of charge estimation method for lithium-ion batteries used in a wide ambient temperature range[J]. Energies, 2014, 7(5): 3004-3032.
[28] Siva Suriya Narayanan S, Thangavel S. Machine learning-based model development for battery state of charge-open circuit voltage relationship using regression techniques[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 49: 104098.
[29] Zhang Shuzhi, Zhang Xiongwen.A comparative study of different online model parameters identification methods for lithium-ion battery[J]. Science China (Technological Sciences), 2021, 64(10): 2312-2327.
[30] 方桂花, 王鹤川, 高旭. 基于动态遗忘因子递推最小二乘法的永磁同步电机参数辨识算法[J]. 计算机应用与软件, 2021, 38(1): 280-283.
Fang Guihua, Wang Hechuan, Gao Xu.Parameter identification algorithm of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on dynamic forgetting factor recursive least square method[J]. Computer Applications and Software, 2021, 38(1): 280-283.
[31] Wan E A, Van Der Merwe R. The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control Symposium (Cat. No. 00EX373), Lake Louise, AB, Canada, 2002: 153-158.