不同代价函数下永磁同步电机模型预测控制参数失配可视化分析

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.220074

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (6862 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract As the model predictive control (MPC) is conceptually clear and simple to implement with the ability to control several nonlinear objectives simultaneously, it is the preferred control method for permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSM). However, the resistance, inductance, and other parameters in the current prediction model are vulnerable to nonlinear factors and changes in the load, resulting in model parameters mismatch, ultimately weakening the robustness and dynamic response ability of the MPC. Recently, although many papers have analyzed the influence of inductance and resistance mismatch on control performance, the influence of flux mismatch has yet to be considered. Additionally, the Euclidean norm, Euclidean norm square, and modular sum cost functions commonly used in MPC systems are considered equivalent. However, more theoretical analysis and experimental verification of the difference and relationship between the three cost functions are still necessary. Therefore, a visual analysis method is proposed to study the effects of different parameter mismatches on the MPC system of PMSM under different cost functions.
Firstly, the reference voltage that meets the control requirements is calculated based on deadbeat control principle. Secondly, the influence of parameters such as resistance, inductance, and flux linkage on the reference voltage is analyzed. The change of the reference voltage spatial position due to different parameter mismatches is determined. Then, based on the mismatched reference voltage, the optimal voltage vectors of different cost functions are obtained. Finally, the Matlab algorithm is used to visually express the selected optimal voltage vectors under all reference voltages. The influence and difference of parameter mismatch on the selection of optimal voltage vectors under different cost functions are analyzed by visualization method, which provides a solid theoretical basis for error compensation control methods.
The experiments of inductance and flux mismatch in the speed loop show that when the load torque is set to 10N·m, and the reference speed is stepped up from 150 r/min to 1 000 r/min, the inductance mismatch has an impact on the selection times of zero vector. Thus, the effective value of the total current error is greater than when the inductance is matched. Meanwhile, at low speed, the current ripples when the flux linkage is mismatched are similar to when the one is matched. However, at high speed, the current ripples and effective value of the total current error when the flux linkage is mismatched are significantly larger than when the one is matched. When the speed is set to 1 000 r/min and the load torque is changed from no-load to full load (25 N·m) and then to no-load, the current ripples and total current error when the inductance and flux linkage are mismatched are larger than those when the parameters are matched. Additionally, under the same conditions, the current ripples and the effective values of total current error under the two Euclidean norm cost functions are smaller than those under the modular sum cost function, indicating that the Euclidean norm cost functions have better control effects. The experimental results are consistent with the visualization analysis results, which shows the correctness and effectiveness of the proposed visualization method.
The following conclusions can be drawn from the theoretical and experimental analysis: (1) Parameter mismatches will affect the optimal voltage vector selection for the MPC method. (2) The MPC methods based on different cost functions have different parameter sensitivities. (3) The two Euclidean norm cost functions are preferred for MPC as they have smaller control errors when the parameters are mismatched.

Key words： Permanent magnet synchronous motor model predictive control parameters mismatch visual analysis cost functions

Received: 16 January 2022

PACS:

TM341

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Guo Leilei
	Wang Pengshuai
	Li Yanyan
	Wu Jie
	Wang Mingjie

Cite this article:

Guo Leilei,Wang Pengshuai,Li Yanyan等. Visual Analysis of Parameters Mismatch in Model Predictive Control for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Under Different Cost Functions[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(4): 903-914.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.220074 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2023/V38/I4/903

[1] 李晓华, 赵容健, 田晓彤, 等. 逆变器供电对电动汽车内置式永磁同步电机振动噪声特性影响研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(21): 4455-4464.
Li Xiaohua, Zhao Rongjian, Tian Xiaotong, et al.Study on vibration and noise characteristics of interior permanent magnet synchronous machine for electric vehicles by inverter[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(21): 4455-4464.
[2] 刘文军, 周龙, 唐西胜, 等. 基于改进型滑模观测器的飞轮储能系统控制方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2014, 34(1): 71-78.
Liu Wenjun, Zhou Long, Tang Xisheng, et al.Research on FESS control based on the improved sliding-mode observer[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2014, 34(1): 71-78.
[3] 刘寅迪, 曾翔君, 骆一萍, 等. 基于MPPMSG的混合高压直流风电系统故障穿越技术[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2020, 44(8): 133-140.
Liu Yindi, Zeng Xiangjun, Luo Yiping, et al.Fault ride-through technology of hybrid HVDC wind power system based on multi-phase permanent magnet syn-chronous generator[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2020, 44(8): 133-140.
[4] 张永昌, 杨海涛, 魏香龙. 基于快速矢量选择的永磁同步电机模型预测控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2016, 31(6): 66-73.
Zhang Yongchang, Yang Haitao, Wei Xianglong.Model predictive control of permanent magnet synchronous motors based on fast vector selection[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2016, 31(6): 66-73.
[5] 林晓刚, 黄文新, 姜文, 等. 共母线开绕组永磁同步电机缺相容错型直接转矩控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(24): 5064-5074.
Lin Xiaogang, Huang Wenxin, Jiang Wen, et al.Fault-tolerant direct torque control for open-end winding permanent magnet synchronous motor with common DC bus under open phase circuit[J]. Transa-ctions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(24): 5064-5074.
[6] Liu Jing, Li Hongwen, Deng Yongting.Torque ripple minimization of PMSM based on robust ILC via adaptive sliding mode control[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2018, 33(4): 3655-3671.
[7] 左月飞, 张捷, 刘闯, 等. 基于自抗扰控制的永磁同步电机位置伺服系统一体化设计[J]. 电工技术学报, 2016, 31(11): 51-58.
Zuo Yuefei, Zhang Jie, Liu Chuang, et al.Integrated design for permanent magnet synchronous motor servo systems based on active disturbance rejection control[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2016, 31(11): 51-58.
[8] 魏惠芳, 王丽梅. 永磁直线同步电机自适应模糊神经网络时变滑模控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(4): 861-869.
Wei Huifang, Wang Limei.Adaptive fuzzy neural network time-varying sliding mode control for per-manent magnet linear synchronous motor[J]. Transa-ctions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(4): 861-869.
[9] Zhang Yongchang, Xie Wei.Low complexity model predictive control-single vector-based approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2014, 29(10): 5532-5541.
[10] Rodriguez J, Pontt J, Silva C A, et al.Predictive current control of a voltage source inverter[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2007, 54(1): 495-503.
[11] Liu Xing, Wang Dan, Peng Zhouhua.Cascade-free fuzzy finite-control-set model predictive control for nested neutral point-clamped converters with low switching frequency[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2019, 27(5): 2237-2244.
[12] 郭磊磊, 金楠, 李琰琰, 等. 电压源逆变器虚拟矢量模型预测共模电压抑制方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(4): 839-849.
Guo Leilei, Jin Nan, Li Yanyan, et al.Virtual vector based model predictive common-mode voltage redu-ction method for voltage source inverters[J]. Transa-ctions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(4): 839-849.
[13] Guo Leilei, Jin Nan, Gan Chun, et al.Hybrid voltage vector preselection-based model predictive control for two-level voltage source inverters to reduce the common-mode voltage[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2020, 67(6): 4680-4691.
[14] Sandre-Hernandez O, de Jesus Rangel-Magdaleno J, Morales-Caporal R. Modified model predictive torque control for a PMSM-drive with torque ripple mini-misation[J]. IET Power Electronics, 2019, 12(5): 1033-1042.
[15] 肖雄, 王浩丞, 武玉娟, 等. 基于双滑模估计的主从结构共轴双电机模型预测直接转矩控制无速度传感器控制策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(5): 1014-1026.
Xiao Xiong, Wang Haocheng, Wu Yujuan, et al.Coaxial dual motor with master-slave structure model-predictive direct torque control speed sensorless control strategy based on double sliding mode estimation[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(5): 1014-1026.
[16] 王金兵, 沈艳霞. 基于增量模型的永磁同步直线电机鲁棒预测电流控制[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2020, 48(8): 69-77.
Wang Jinbing, Shen Yanxia.Robust predictive current control for a permanent magnet synchronous linear motor based on an incremental model[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2020, 48(8): 69-77.
[17] Yang Gang, Deng Zhiquan, Cao Xin, et al.Optimal winding arrangements of a bearingless switched reluctance motor[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2008, 23(6): 3056-3066.
[18] 李伟, 张勇军, 肖雄. 实时电感辨识的模型预测并网逆变器控制方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2018, 33(15): 3450-3460.
Li Wei, Zhang Yongjun, Xiao Xiong.The model predictive grid-connected inverter control method based on real-time inductance identification[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2018, 33(15): 3450-3460.
[19] Young H A, Perez M A, Rodriguez J.Analysis of finite-control-set model predictive current control with model parameter mismatch in a three-phase inverter[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Elec-tronics, 2016, 63(5): 3100-3107.
[20] Tarisciotti L, Zanchetta P, Watson A, et al.Modulated model predictive control for a three-phase active rectifier[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Appli-cations, 2015, 51(2): 1610-1620.
[21] 陈琢, 王琛琛, 成前. 基于单一矢量的两电平逆变器快速模型预测控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(增刊2): 654-664, 687.
Chen Zhuo, Wang Chenchen, Cheng Qian.Fast model predictive control of two-level inverter based on single vector[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(S2): 654-664, 687.
[22] Mirzaeva G, Goodwin G, Townsend C.A simple and effective strategy to reduce switching losses under FS-MPC based on dynamically changing voronoi diagrams[C]//12th IEEE Conference on Indu-strial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Siem Reap, Cambodia, 2018: 1516-1521.
[23] Guo Leilei, Xu Zhiye, Li Yanyan, et al.An indu-ctance online identification-based model predictive control method for grid-connected inverters with an improved phase-locked loop[J]. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2022, 8(2): 2695-2709.
[24] Xia Changliang, Liu Tao, Shi Tingna, et al.A simplified finite-control-set model-predictive control for power converters[J]. IEEE Transactions on Indu-strial Informatics, 2014, 10(2): 991-1002.
[25] Jacob B, Baiju M R.Spread spectrum modulation scheme for two-level inverter using vector quantised space vector-based pulse density modulation[J]. IET Electric Power Applications, 2011, 5(7): 589-596.