|
|
Control Strategy and Characteristic Analysis of Multi-Phase Stacked Interleaved Buck Converter for Hydrogen Production |
Zhang Li, Han Minxiao, Fan Yiwen |
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering North China Electric Power University Beijing 102206 China |
|
|
Abstract Efficiency and output ripple of hydrogen generation converters are critical metrics in hydrogen energy applications. Multi-phase interleaved Buck converter (MPIBC) suppresses the output ripple by increasing parallel branches, adopting the higher switching frequency, and adding filter inductance. However, that will lead to an increment in both costs and losses. To solve this deficiency, adding a ripple compensating shunt branch to MPIBC, a new topology, multi-phase stacked interleaved Buck converter (MPSIBC), is proposed in this paper. PWM control with the compensation characteristic is adopted in the compensation branch, in which the output AC current is complementary to the ripple of the MPIBC output current. The idea of output compensation is used to eliminate the output ripple of the converter without dependence on other factors, such as switching frequency. Based on the theoretical analysis of MPSIBC topology and the principle of ripple compensation, simulation on PSIM and physical experiments are established accordingly. Both the simulation and experimental results prove the ripple suppression capability of the proposed MPSIBC, with the reduction of the switching frequency and the inductance of the filters. By adding a capacitor to one of the branches in MPIBC, the function of that branch changes from the original power flow to ripple compensation. This paper refers to the branch as a ripple compensation branch, where the capacitor acts as a voltage divider and a DC blocker. The MPSIBC proposed in this paper is MPIBC with the ripple compensation branch, and its topology and control strategy is first described in detail. Different pulse width modulation signals control the ripple compensation branch and other branches in MPSIBC. The control result is that the compensation branch provides a path for the converter output ripple, thus preventing the ripple from output to the load. The parameter calculations for the converter are then illustrated. The switching frequency and inductance are chosen for continuous conduction mode, and the capacitance is determined for ripple compensation. Next, the converter operation is divided into six stages in combination with the timing diagram of the control signal. The output current ripple of each stage is analyzed theoretically using the formula derivation. Theoretical results show that MPSIBC can achieve almost zero current ripple output under ideal conditions. Finally, the losses of the converter are calculated. The lower switching frequency and the filter inductor in MPSIBC significantly reduce the switching and inductor losses, respectively. This paper builds an MPSIBC simulation model in the PSIM professional tool. In order to estimate the converter losses, the IGBT is simulated using a thermal physical model. The simulation model diagram and parameter table are provided in the paper. A 400W 4PSIBC experimental prototype is also built in the laboratory to verify the simulation. The experiments are implemented in three aspects: output current ripple, fault tolerance, and efficiency. The experimental results indicate that the current ripple output by MPSIBC is approximately 0.2A, a reduction of 83.3% compared to the MPIBC. In the fault tolerance test, one of the power branches in the MPSIBC is set to a fault, and the results show that the compensation branch can still effectively cancel the current ripple after the fault. An experimental comparison of MPSIBC and MPIBC shows that MPSIBC is about 5% more efficient than MPIBC due to the reduction in filter inductance and switching frequency. The experimental results of the prototype verify the correctness of the theoretical analysis and simulation. The MPSIBC proposed in this paper adds a capacitor to the MPIBC topology to form a ripple compensation branch, thus resolving the conflict between MPIBC output ripple and efficiency.
|
Received: 17 November 2021
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 孙惠, 翟海保, 吴鑫. 源网荷储多元协调控制系统的研究及应用[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(15): 3264-3271. Sun Hui, Zhai Haibao, Wu Xin.Research and appli-cation of multi-energy coordinated control of gener-ation, network, load and storage[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(15): 3264-3271. [2] 李建林, 牛萌, 周喜超, 等. 能源互联网中微能源系统储能容量规划及投资效益分析[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(4): 874-884. Li Jianlin, Niu Meng, Zhou Xichao, et al.Energy storage capacity planning and investment benefit analysis of micro-energy system in energy inter-connection[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(4): 874-884. [3] 潘光胜, 顾伟, 张会岩, 等. 面向高比例可再生能源消纳的电氢能源系统[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2020, 44(23): 1-10. Pan Guangsheng, Gu Wei, Zhang Huiyan, et al.Electri-city and hydrogen energy system towards accomodation of high proportion of renewable energy[J]. Auto-mation of Electric Power Systems, 2020, 44(23): 1-10. [4] 李争, 张蕊, 孙鹤旭, 等. 可再生能源多能互补制-储-运氢关键技术综述[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(3): 446-462. Li Zheng, Zhang Rui, Sun Hexu, et al.Review on key technologies of hydrogen generation, storage and transportation based on multi-energy complementary renewable energy[J]. Transactions of China Electro-technical Society, 2021, 36(3): 446-462. [5] 李健强, 余光正, 汤波, 等. 考虑风光利用率和含氢能流的多能流综合能源系统规划[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2021, 49(14): 11-20. Li Jianqiang, Yu Guangzheng, Tang Bo, et al.Multi-energy flow integrated energy system planning considering wind and solar utilization and containing hydrogen energy flow[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2021, 49(14): 11-20. [6] 李奇, 赵淑丹, 蒲雨辰, 等. 考虑电氢耦合的混合储能微电网容量配置优化[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(3): 486-495. Li Qi, Zhao Shudan, Pu Yuchen, et al.Capacity optimization of hybrid energy storage microgrid con-sidering electricity-hydrogen coupling[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(3): 486-495. [7] Buttler A, Spliethoff H.Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 82(3): 2440-2454. [8] Guilbert D, Collura S M, Scipioni A.DC-DC converter topologies for electrolyzers: state-of-the-art and remaining key issues[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(38): 23966-23985. [9] Guilbert D, Sorbera D, Vitale G.A stacked inter-leaved DC-DC Buck converter for proton exchange membrane electrolyzer applications: design and experimental validation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(1): 64-79. [10] 郭小强, 魏玉鹏, 万燕鸣, 等. 新能源制氢电力电子变换器综述[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(20): 185-199. Guo Xiaoqiang, Wei Yupeng, Wan Yanming, et al.Review on power electronic converters for producing hydrogen from renewable energy sources[J]. Auto-mation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45(20): 185-199. [11] Vázquez N, Reyes-malanche J A, Vázquez E, et al. Delayed quadratic Buck converter[J]. 2016, 9: 2534-2542. [12] Dc H S, Application D C, Zhang L, et al.An interleaved series-capacitor tapped Buck[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2019, 34(7): 6565-6574. [13] Kolli A, Gaillard A, De Bernardinis A, et al.A review on DC-DC converter architectures for power fuel cell applications[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 105: 716-730. [14] 童军, 吴伟东, 李发成, 等. 基于GaN器件的高频高效LLC谐振变换器[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(增刊2): 635-643. Tong Jun, Wu Weidong, Li Facheng, et al.High-frequency and high-efficiency LLC resonant con-verter based on GaN devices[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(S2): 635-643. [15] Dobó Z, Palotás Á B.Impact of the current fluctuation on the efficiency of alkaline water electrolysis[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(9): 5649-5656. [16] Buitendach H P C, Gouws R, Martinson C A, et al. Effect of a ripple current on the efficiency of a PEM electrolyser[J]. Results in Engineering, 2021, 10. [17] Palma L.Current source converter topology selection for low frequency ripple current reduction in PEM fuel cell applications[C]//IECON Proceedings (Industrial Electronics Conference), Vienna, Austria, 2013: 1577-1582. [18] 赵清林, 刘会峰, 袁精, 等. 基于移相补偿的全桥LLC谐振变换器交错并联技术[J]. 电工技术学报, 2018, 33(12): 2777-2787. Zhao Qinglin, Liu Huifeng, Yuan Jing, et al.An interleaved full-bridge LLC resonant converter with phase shift compensation[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2018, 33(12): 2777-2787. [19] 汪元鑫, 苏瑾, 胡金高. 电动汽车车载充电系统的设计与研究[J]. 电气技术, 2019, 20(7): 5-8, 17. Wang Yuanxin, Su Jin, Hu Jingao.Research on onboard charging system for electric vehicle[J]. Electrical Engineering, 2019, 20(7): 5-8,17. [20] 王朝强, 曹太强, 郭筱瑛, 等. 三相交错并联双向DC-DC变换器动态休眠控制策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(15): 3214-3223. Wang Chaoqiang, Cao Taiqiang, Guo Xiaoying, et al.Dynamic dormancy control strategy of three-phase staggered parallel bidirectional DC-DC converter[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(15): 3214-3223. [21] 高青. 低纹波输出的多相交错并联Buck变换器研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2017. [22] 杨玉岗, 祁鳞, 李龙华. 交错并联磁集成Buck变换器本质安全性输出纹波电压的分析[J]. 电工技术学报, 2014, 29(6): 181-188. Yang Yugang, Qi Lin, Li Longhua.Analysis of output ripple voltage of essential safety for interleaving magnetics Buck converter[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2014, 29(6): 181-188. [23] 陈东, 王磊, 赵君君. 基于改进平均电流控制的交错型磁耦合DC-DC变换器研究[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2016, 44(24): 58-65. Chen Dong, Wang Lei, Zhao Junjun.Research of staggered parallel magnetic DC-DC converters based on improved average current control[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2016, 44(24): 58-65. [24] 郭瑞, 王磊. 混合储能系统六通道双向DC-DC变换器耦合电感研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2017, 32(1): 117-128. Guo Rui, Wang Lei.Research on coupled inductors of 6-channel bi-directional DC-DC converters for hybrid energy storage system[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2017, 32(1): 117-128. |
|
|
|