电-氢-路耦合下灵活运氢与动态孤岛协同的配电网时序故障恢复

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.250413

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (890 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Extreme disasters often cause failures in distribution network (DN) lines, leading to large-scale power outages. Leveraging emergency response capabilities to the fullest is critical for improving the efficiency of power recovery. Existing studies have explored the use of energy storage (ES) in power supply; however, the flexibility and efficiency of ES are constrained by its relatively low energy density and limited storage stability. Furthermore, current research on fault recovery primarily concentrates on emergency resources within isolated networks, paying insufficient attention to coordinated recovery across multiple coupled infrastructure systems. To overcome these limitations, this paper proposes a time-series fault recovery strategy for distribution networks that integrates flexible hydrogen energy transfer and dynamic islanding coordination under fault conditions.
First, based on the electricity-hydrogen-road coupling framework, this study incorporates road network (RN) constraints and cross-regional hydrogen collaboration. The transfer time and capacity limitations of hydrogen transportation tankers traveling on road network are analyzed. A flexible hydrogen transfer model is then developed to enable energy sharing among multiple microgrids. Subsequently, factors such as line repair sequencing, repair duration, and fault distribution are taken into account to characterize the interaction between line repair progress and network topology regulation, establishing a dynamic islanding model of DN. Finally, by harnessing the emergency support capabilities of multiple hydrogen-powered microgrids, a unified decision-making model for time-series fault recovery is proposed. This model organically integrates hydrogen exchange and dynamic islanding operations, achieving the objective of minimizing post-fault load shedding and achieving optimal restoration of power supply.
Case studies are conducted on the modified IEEE 33 DN-32 RN with 3 microgrids. The results indicate that the coordinated operation of multiple emergency resources within the coupled electricity-hydrogen-road network contributes to optimal post-fault recovery. Specifically, the distribution network is segmented into multiple independent power supply islands based on the operational status of power lines, ensuring internal resource self-sufficiency and outward contribution. And microgrids transition from the load roles to the generation ones for supplying power to dispersed loads, while hydrogen tankers transport energy between different microgrids to realize spatio-temporal supply-demand balance. Repair crews prioritize their actions based on real-time DN conditions and the power supply requirements of each isolated region. Comparative analysis of various fault recovery strategies demonstrates that the proposed approach improves the load restoration rate by 24.16%, 22.86%, and 8.8%, respectively, compared to strategies employing only a single emergency measure.
The following conclusions can be drawn: (1) The proposed flexible hydrogen transfer model enables complementary energy support among microgrids under extreme conditions, significantly improving the distribution of energy supply in fault-affected areas. (2) The dynamic islanding model effectively coordinates the temporal coupling between line repair and islanding partition, contributing to the rapid restoration of critical loads. (3) The unified fault recovery strategy optimizes both energy supply and network topology, enhancing the flexibility of the recovery process and strengthening the post-fault supply capacity for multi-type loads.

Key words： Electricity-hydrogen-road coupling flexible hydrogen transfer line repair dynamic islanding time-series fault recovery

Received: 17 March 2025

PACS:

TM73

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.250413 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y0/V/I/250413

[1] 王守相, 尹孜阳, 赵倩宇. 考虑多供电层级耦合的中低压配电网分布式光伏承载力一体化精细评估方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2025, 40(6): 1930-1944.
Wang Shouxiang, Yin Ziyang, Zhao Qianyu.A precise distributed PV hosting capability evaluation method for MV and LV distribution network considering the coupling of multiple power supply layers[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2025, 40(6): 1930-1944.
[2] 刘磊. 基于智能软开关的配电网故障恢复研究[J]. 电气技术, 2024, 25(9): 27-32, 37.
Liu Lei.Research on fault recovery process of distribution network based on soft open point[J]. Electrical Engineering, 2024, 25(9): 27-32, 37.
[3] 董雷, 杨子民, 乔骥, 等. 基于分层约束强化学习的综合能源多微网系统优化调度[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(5): 1436-1453.
Dong Lei, Yang Zimin, Qiao Ji, et al.Optimal scheduling of integrated energy multi-microgrid system based on hierarchical constraint reinforcement learning[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(5): 1436-1453.
[4] 蔡胜, 谢云云, 张玉坪, 等. 考虑移动应急电源配置的微电网顺序恢复方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43(7): 2677-2689.
Cai Sheng, Xie Yunyun, Zhang Yuping, et al.A sequential service restoration method for microgrids considering optimal allocation of mobile emergency generators[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43(7): 2677-2689.
[5] 王颖, 祝士焱, 许寅, 等. 考虑多类型储能协同的重要负荷恢复方法[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2022, 42(1): 72-78.
Wang Ying, Zhu Shiyan, Xu Yin, et al.Critical load restoration method considering coordination of multiple types of energy storage[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2022, 42(1): 72-78.
[6] 屈柏林, 张雪霞, 陈维荣, 等. 计及微网余电制氢的加氢站设备容量优化配置[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(10): 11-21.
Qu Bolin, Zhang Xuexia, Chen Weirong, et al.Capacity optimization configuration of equipment in hydrogen refueling station considering microgrid residual electricity to hydrogen production[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2024, 45(10): 11-21.
[7] Zhu Shiyan, Xu Yin, Wang Ying, et al.Resilience-motivated service restoration of interdependent power and hydrogen distribution system[J]. IEEE Access, 2024, 12: 149528-149542.
[8] Afsari N, SeyedShenava S, Shayeghi H. Chance constrained robust hydrogen storage management to service restoration in microgrids considering the methanation process model[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 50: 1463-1476.
[9] Shahbazbegian V, Shafie-khah M, Laaksonen H, et al. Resilience-oriented operation of microgrids in the presence of power-to-hydrogen systems[J]. Applied Energy, 2023, 348: 121429.
[10] Liu Jinhui, Cao Xiaoyu, Xu Zhanbo, et al.Resilient operation of multi-energy industrial park based on integrated hydrogen-electricity-heat microgrids[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(57): 28855-28869.
[11] 王丰, 杨函煜, 李林溪, 等. 考虑氢能交通运输时空特性的电-氢综合能源系统协同优化方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2023, 47(19): 31-43.
Wang Feng, Yang Hanyu, Li Linxi, et al.Collaborative optimal method for electricity-hydrogen integrated energy system considering spatial-temporal characteristics of hydrogen transportation[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2023, 47(19): 31-43.
[12] 蒙军, 任洲洋, 王皓. 氢能交互下的多区域电氢综合能源系统可靠性提升策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(16): 5011-5027.
Meng Jun, Ren Zhouyang, Wang Hao.Reliability improvement strategies of multi-region electricity-hydrogen integrated energy systems considering hydrogen interaction between different regions[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(16): 5011-5027.
[13] Zhao Yuxuan, Lin Jin, Song Yonghua, et al.A hierarchical strategy for restorative self-healing of hydrogen-penetrated distribution systems considering energy sharing via mobile resources[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2023, 38(2): 1388-1404.
[14] Dong Yuchen, Zheng Weibo, Cao Xiaoyu, et al.Co-planning of hydrogen-based microgrids and fuel-cell bus operation centers under low-carbon and resilience considerations[J]. Applied Energy, 2023, 336: 120849.
[15] Zhao Yuxuan, Lin Jin, Song Yonghua, et al.A robust microgrid formation strategy for resilience enhancement of hydrogen penetrated active distribution networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2023, 39(2): 2735-2748.
[16] Lee J, Razeghi G, Samuelsen S.Utilization of battery electric buses for the resiliency of islanded microgrids[J]. Applied Energy, 2023, 347: 121295.
[17] Cao Xiaoyu, Cao Tianxiang, Xu Zhanbo, et al.Resilience constrained scheduling of mobile emergency resources in electricity-hydrogen distribution network[J]. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2022, 14(2): 1269-1284.
[18] Li Bei, Li Jiangchen, Jian Bingcong.Improve multi-energy supply microgrid resilience using mobile hydrogen trucks based on transportation network[J]. eTransportation, 2023, 18: 100265.
[19] 肖娟霞, 李勇, 韩宇, 等. 计及台风时空特性和灵活性资源协同优化的配电网弹性提升策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(23): 7430-7446.
Xiao Juanxia, Li Yong, Han Yu, et al.Resilience enhancement strategy for distribution networks considering the spatiotemporal characteristics of typhoon and the collaborative optimization of flexible resources[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(23): 7430-7446.
[20] 毛志鹏, 孙建军, 黄志强, 等. 考虑闭式潮流优化分布的主动配电网供电恢复方法[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2024, 44(8): 109-115.
Mao Zhipeng, Sun Jianjun, Huang Zhiqiang, et al.Power supply recovery method of active distribution network considering optimal distribution of closed-loop power flow[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2024, 44(8): 109-115.
[21] 祝昊, 付炜, 谢海鹏, 等. 考虑元件故障位置不确定性的维修队预调度与灾后派遣方法[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2024, 44(6): 161-168.
Zhu Hao, Fu Wei, Xie Haipeng, et al.Repair crew pre-scheduling and post-disaster dispatch method considering uncertainty of component fault location[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2024, 44(6): 161-168.
[22] Wang Xiaoqin, Sheng Xudan, Qiu Weixing, et al.Fault reconfiguration strategies of active distribution network with uncertain factors for maximum supply capacity enhancement[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 10: 72373-72380.
[23] Zhang Lu, Jiang Shujun, Zhang Bo, et al.Coordinated optimization of emergency power vehicles and distribution network reconfiguration considering the uncertain restoration capability of E-taxis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2022, 58(2): 2707-2717.
[24] 田书欣, 姚尚坤, 符杨, 等. 地震灾害下考虑交通路况的主动配电网动态协同恢复策略[J]. 电力建设, 2024, 45(1): 68-82.
Tian Shuxin, Yao Shangkun, Fu Yang, et al.Dynamic collaborative restoration strategy of active distribution network considering traffic condition under earthquake[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2024, 45(1): 68-82.
[25] 陈潇瑞, 李晓露, 林顺富. 考虑交通网延误的配电网灾后滚动抢修策略优化[J]. 现代电力, 2023, 40(5): 807-816.
Chen Xiaorui, Li Xiaolu, Lin Shunfu.Optimization of post-disaster rolling emergency repair strategy for distribution network considering transportation network delay[J]. Modern Electric Power, 2023, 40(5): 807-816.
[26] 董桂岑, 何川, 刘绚, 等. 考虑网络重构和应急资源的灾后配电网信息物理系统协调恢复方法[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2024, 44(9): 106-113.
Dong Guicen, He Chuan, Liu Xuan, et al.Coordinated recovery method of post-disaster distribution network cyber-physical system considering network reconstruction and emergency resources[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2024, 44(9): 106-113.
[27] 王杰, 贾宏杰, 靳小龙, 等. 基于电-氢-热P2P交易的分布式智能电网低碳优化运行方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2025, 49(9): 40-51.
Wang Jie, Jia Hongjie, Jin Xiaolong, et al.Low-carbon operation optimization method for distributed smart grid based on electricity-hydrogen-heat peer-to-peer trading[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2025, 49(9): 40-51.
[28] 徐岩, 郭佳睿, 马天祥. 考虑韧性提升的配电网故障恢复与抢修协调优化[J]. 高电压技术, 2024, 50(12): 5516-5528.
Xu Yan, Guojia Rui, Ma Tianxiang.Coordinated optimization of fault recovery and emergency repair for distribution network considering resilience improvement[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2024, 50(12): 5516-5528.
[29] 李鹏, 钟瀚明, 马红伟, 等. 基于深度强化学习的有源配电网多时间尺度源荷储协同优化调控[J]. 电工技术学报, 2025, 40(5): 1487-1502.
Li Peng, Zhong Hanming, Ma Hongwei, et al.Multi-timescale optimal dispatch of source-load-storage coordination in active distribution network based on deep reinforcement learning[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2025, 40(5): 1487-1502.
[30] Ding Tao, Lin Yanling, Li Gengfeng, et al.A new model for resilient distribution systems by microgrids formation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2017, 32(5): 4145-4147.