考虑电流环控制域差异的构网变流器序阻抗建模及电网适用性对比分析

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.242378

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (10)

Download: PDF (5932 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract As an indispensable device in the modern power system, the grid-forming converter (GFM) plays a vital role in the power grid with highly permeability. Especially in the context of the continuous increase in the proportion of renewable energy power generation, its support performance for weak power grids has become a hot topic in the research field. The output impedance characteristics of GFM are not only related to its own operational stability, but also directly affect the dynamic response and stability of the entire power grid. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the output impedance characteristics of GFM to improve the overall performance and reliability of the power system.
In the current internal loop control strategy, the dq domain proportional-integral (PI) control and the phase domain quasi-proportional-resonant (QPR) control are two widely used methods. The dq domain PI control is known for its simplicity and ease of implementation, while the phase domain QPR control excels in harmonic suppression and dynamic response. However, although these two control strategies have achieved good results in practical applications, their impedance modeling and comparative analysis are relatively insufficient. Especially in the modeling of phase domain impedance, where the complexity and nonlinearity of phase-domain control pose additional challenges to related research.
To complement this part of the study, this paper explores in depth the impedance modeling methods of GFM under different control domains. Firstly, we construct the harmonic linearization order impedance model of GFM under PI control and QPR control, respectively. These two models not only consider the fundamental component, but also fully consider the influence of the harmonic component on the impedance characteristics, so as to describe the impedance characteristics of GFM more accurately. By comparing the two models, we find that there are significant differences in the impedance characteristics of GFM under the two control strategies. The impedance characteristics under PI control are relatively stable, but they are easily affected by the strength of the grid and the number of grids. On the other hand, the impedance characteristics under QPR control are more flexible and can better adapt to changes in the grid environment.
Furthermore, we use the established model and combine with the Nyquist criterion to analyze the effects of PI control and QPR control on grid connection stability under different grid strengths and grid connection numbers. The analysis results show that the applicability of PI control is relatively weak in the strong power grid environment, because the stability of the power grid itself is strong and the requirements for converters are relatively low. QPR control can better suppress harmonic interference and improve the steady-state performance of the power grid. However, under extremely weak grid conditions, PI control shows stronger applicability. Because the stability of the power grid is weak at this time, the converter needs to have a stronger support capacity. PI control can achieve better support for the power grid by adjusting the parameters. In addition, we also found that both PI control and QPR control showed good stability in multi-GFM grid-connected systems. This is due to the fact that both control strategies have good current regulation and dynamic response speed.
Finally, we verify the correctness of the above theoretical analysis through simulation experiments. The simulation results show that the GFM under the two control strategies can maintain stable grid-connected operation under different grid conditions. At the same time, we also find that the simulation results are consistent with the theoretical analysis results, which further verifies the effectiveness and accuracy of the impedance model established in this paper. These research results not only provide a useful theoretical reference for the optimal design and stable operation of GFM, but also provide important technical support for the application of grid-based converters in high-permeability power grids.

Key words： Grid-forming converter sequential impedance modeling grid-connected stability inner loop control

Received: 29 December 2024

PACS:

TM712

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Lan Zheng
	Wang Haihui
	He Dong
	Sun Zhifeng
	Chen Liyang

Cite this article:

Lan Zheng,Wang Haihui,He Dong等. Sequence Impedance Modeling of Grid-Forming Converter Considering the Difference of Current Loop Control Domain and Comparative Analysis of Power Grid Applicability[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2026, 41(3): 834-848.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.242378 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2026/V41/I3/834

[1] 张智刚, 康重庆. 碳中和目标下构建新型电力系统的挑战与展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(8): 2806-2819.
Zhang Zhigang, Kang Chongqing.Challenges and prospects for constructing the new-type power system towards a carbon neutrality future[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42(8): 2806-2819.
[2] 朱冠南, 陈敏, 王鹏程, 等. 低电网阻抗下构网型直挂式储能系统稳定性提升控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2025, 40(9): 2697-2711.
Zhu Guannan, Chen Min, Wang Pengcheng, et al.Stability enhancement control strategy for grid-forming transformerless energy storage system under low grid impedance conditions[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2025, 40(9): 2697-2711.
[3] 谢震, 高翔, 张悬光, 等. 弱电网下功率同步构网型DFIG的阻尼分析及转矩振荡抑制[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2023, 47(11): 29-38.
Xie Zhen, Gao Xiang, Zhang Xuanguang, et al.Damping analysis and torque oscillation suppression of power synchronized grid-forming doubly-fed induction generator in weak grid[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2023, 47(11): 29-38.
[4] 黄萌, 舒思睿, 李锡林, 等. 面向同步稳定性的电力电子并网变流器分析与控制研究综述[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(19): 5978-5994.
Huang Meng, Shu Sirui, Li Xilin, et al.A review of synchronization-stability-oriented analysis and control of power electronic grid-connected converters[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(19): 5978-5994.
[5] 熊小玲, 李昕悦, 周琰, 等. 基于陷波器的构网型换流器同步频率谐振抑制策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(12): 3827-3839.
Xiong Xiaoling, Li Xinyue, Zhou Yan, et al.Synchronous frequency resonance suppression of grid-forming converter based on Notch filter[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(12): 3827-3839.
[6] Ai Cheng, Li Yitong, Zhao Ziwen, et al.An extension of grid-forming: a frequency-following voltage-forming inverter[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2024, 39(10): 12118-12123.
[7] 詹长江, 吴恒, 王雄飞, 等. 构网型变流器稳定性研究综述[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43(6): 2339-2359.
Zhan Changjiang, Wu Heng, Wang Xiongfei, et al.An overview of stability studies of grid-forming voltage source converters[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43(6): 2339-2359.
[8] Xie Zhiwei, Chen Yandong, Wu Wenhua, et al.Frequency coupling admittance modeling of quasi-PR controlled inverter and its stability comparative analysis under the weak grid[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 94912-94922.
[9] 高磊, 吕敬, 马骏超, 等. 基于电路等效的并网逆变器失稳分析与稳定控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(8): 2325-2341.
Gao Lei, Lü Jing, Ma Junchao, et al.Instability analysis and stability control of grid-connected inverter based on impedance circuit equivalent[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(8): 2325-2341.
[10] 李琳, 张晓楠, 李庚银, 等. 考虑内外环交互作用的VSG并网振荡特性[J]. 电力建设, 2024, 45(4): 66-76.
Li Lin, Zhang Xiaonan, Li Gengyin, et al.Characteris-tics of VSG grid-connected system oscillation considering the interaction between inner and outer loops[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2024, 45(4): 66-76.
[11] Wu Wenhua, Zhou Leming, Chen Yandong, et al.Sequence-impedance-based stability comparison between VSGs and traditional grid-connected inverters[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2019, 34(1): 46-52.
[12] 雷雨, 李光辉, 王伟胜, 等. 跟网型和构网型新能源并网控制阻抗对比与振荡机理分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45(1): 150-163.
Lei Yu, Li Guanghui, Wang Weisheng, et al.Comparison of impedance characteristics and oscillation mechanism for grid following and grid forming renewable energy[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45(1): 150-163.
[13] Shi Kai, Wang Yu, Sun Yuxin, et al.Frequency-coupled impedance modeling of virtual synchronous generators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2021, 36(4): 3692-3700.
[14] 周于清, 姚伟, 宗启航, 等. 基于运行短路比的新能源场站中跟/构网可切换单元的最优配置方法[J]. 电网技术, 2024, 48(3): 1091-1104.
Zhou Yuqing, Yao Wei, Zong Qihang, et al.Optimal configuration of grid-following/grid-forming switchable units in new energy stations based on operating short-circuit ratio[J]. Power System Technology, 2024, 48(3): 1091-1104.
[15] 杜燕, 朱轲, 杨向真, 等. 考虑频率耦合的VSG虚拟阻抗优化设计[J]. 高电压技术, 2022, 48(12): 5057-5067.
Du Yan, Zhu Ke, Yang Xiangzhen, et al.Optimal design of virtual synchronous generator virtual impedance considering frequency coupling[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2022, 48(12): 5057-5067.
[16] 刘欣, 郭志博, 贾焦心, 等. 基于序阻抗的虚拟同步发电机并网稳定性分析及虚拟阻抗设计[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(15): 4130-4146.
Liu Xin, Guo Zhibo, Jia Jiaoxin, et al.Stability analysis and virtual impedance design of virtual synchronous machine based on sequence impedance[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(15): 4130-4146.
[17] 杨万里, 涂春鸣, 兰征, 等. 基于储能型柔性多状态开关的直流微电网与交流配电网柔性互联策略[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2021, 41(5): 254-260.
Yang Wanli, Tu Chunming, Lan Zheng, et al.Flexible interconnection strategy between DC microgrid and AC distribution grid based on energy storage flexible multi-state switch[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2021, 41(5): 254-260.
[18] Song Yuanzong, Liu Zhijie, Li Kejun, et al.Accurate identification of frequency-coupling admittance for grid-connected converters under all operating condi-tions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2024, 39(12): 15596-15608.
[19] Xie Zhiwei, Wu Wenhua, Chen Yandong, et al.Admittance-based stability comparative analysis of grid-connected inverters with direct power control and closed-loop current control[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2021, 68(9): 8333-8344.