面向差异化电源成本结构的容量市场机制设计

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.231474

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (863 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract

Capacity market is one important solution for the arising generation adequacy issues in power system by compensating for the investment costs of sources and stimulating generation investment. However, due to the differentiated cost structures of different types of sources, such as renewable energy sources and flexible power sources, existing capacity market is difficult to provide effective differentiated investment incentive signals to guide a rational generation investment. Recent research lacks the exploration of capacity market to the differentiated cost structures of power sources, and few studies have proposed corresponding improvement strategies. To address these issues, this paper analyzed the problems in capacity market caused by differentiated cost structures and proposed a capacity market design considering the differentiated cost structures of power sources.
Firstly, the paper explained the issues in existing capacity market by taking the phenomenon of “free-riding” of renewable energy sources as an example and then provided further illustration through quantitative analysis. Secondly, the paper proposed a capacity market organization model with sub-platform biddings for renewable energy and flexible power sources. Thirdly, to set appropriate market parameters so as to coordinate the difference in cost structures of sources, an investment simulation method was proposed to model investment incentive utility in the capacity market, and a strategy for setting key parameters based on the closed-loop feedback of the investment incentive utility was developed. The proposed capacity market design can satisfy the differentiated capacity compensation demand of renewable energy sources and flexible power sources, guide the development of a more reasonable source structure under a controllable capacity compensation cost, and support the construction of the new power system.
To verify the effectiveness of the proposed capacity market design, simulations were conducted on a system with one type of wind power source and three types of coal power sources. Simulation results show that the investment of renewable energy sources in the current capacity market mechanism is much higher than a preset investment goal, while in the proposed capacity market design, the capacity development of both renewable energy sources and flexible sources can follow the investment goal pretty well. The revenue ratio of each type of sources in current capacity market has higher fluctuations than that in the proposed capacity market design. Also, the current capacity market cannot guarantee the full cost recovery of each power source while the proposed capacity market design can provide sufficient but not excessive capacity compensation for each source. Meanwhile, in terms of economy, the proposed capacity market design can lower the market operation cost while guaranteeing the full cost recovery of capacity.
The following conclusions can be drawn from the simulation analysis: (1) In the existing capacity market, there exists a phenomenon of “free-ridding” due to the differentiated cost structures of power sources. (2) The proposed capacity market design can stimulate reasonable capacity investment by satisfying the different capacity compensation demand of renewable energy sources and flexible energy sources. (3) The proposed capacity market design reduces the market operation cost by avoiding paying renewable energy sources an additional payment that is caused by the “free-ridding” of renewable energy sources.

Key words： Capacity markets cost structure differences capacity demand curve generation capacity adequacy generation investment

Received: 07 September 2023

PACS:

TM73

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Li Qirui
	Yang Zhifang
	Li Wenyuan

Cite this article:

Li Qirui,Yang Zhifang,Li Wenyuan. Capacity Market Mechanism Design for Power Sources with Differentiated Cost Structures[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 0, (): 231474-231474.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.231474 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y0/V/I/231474

[1] 周孝信, 赵强, 张玉琼. “双碳”目标下我国能源电力系统发展前景和关键技术[J]. 中国电力企业管理, 2021(31): 14-17.
Zhou Xiaoxin, Zhao Qiang, Zhang Yuqiong.Development prospect and key technologies of China’s energy and power system under the goal of “double carbon”[J]. China Power Enterprise Management, 2021(31): 14-17.
[2] 潘郑楠, 邓长虹, 徐慧慧, 等. 考虑灵活性补偿的高比例风电与多元灵活性资源博弈优化调度[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(增刊1): 56-69.
Pan Zhengnan, Deng Changhong, Xu Huihui, et al.Game optimization scheduling of high proportion wind power and multiple flexible resources considering flexibility compensation[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(S1): 56-69.
[3] 吴珊, 边晓燕, 张菁娴, 等. 面向新型电力系统灵活性提升的国内外辅助服务市场研究综述[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(6): 1662-1677.
Wu Shan, Bian Xiaoyan, Zhang Jingxian, et al.A review of domestic and foreign ancillary services market for improving flexibility of new power system[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(6): 1662-1677.
[4] 亢丽君, 王蓓蓓, 薛必克, 等. 计及爬坡场景覆盖的高比例新能源电网平衡策略研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(13): 3275-3288.
Kang Lijun, Wang Beibei, Xue Bike, et al.Research on the balance strategy for power grid with high proportion renewable energy considering the ramping scenario coverage[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(13): 3275-3288.
[5] 李军徽,安晨宇,李翠萍等.计及调峰市场交易的储能-新能源-火电多目标优化调度方法[J/OL]. 电工技术学报: 1-16[2023-10-31]. https://doi.org/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.221720.
Li Junhui, An Chenyu, Li Cuiping, et al. Multi-objective optimization scheduling method considering peak regulating market transactions for energy storage-new energy-thermal power[J/OL]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society: 1-16[2023-10-31]. https://doi.org/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.221720.
[6] 喻芸, 荆朝霞, 陈雨果, 等. 电力市场环境下典型发电容量充裕性机制及对我国的启示[J]. 电网技术, 2019, 43(8): 2734-2742.
Yu Yun, Jing Zhaoxia, Chen Yuguo, et al.Typical generation resource adequacy mechanism in electricity market and enlightenment to China[J]. Power System Technology, 2019, 43(8): 2734-2742.
[7] Hogan M.Follow the missing money: ensuring reliability at least cost to consumers in the transition to a low-carbon power system[J]. The Electricity Journal, 2017, 30(1): 55-61.
[8] 孙启星, 尤培培, 李成仁, 等. 适应中国现行电力市场环境下的容量市场机制设计[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(8): 196-201.
Sun Qixing, You Peipei, Li Chengren, et al.Capacity market mechanism design under electricity market mechanism in China[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(8): 196-201.
[9] 袁家海, 张为荣, 杨炯君. 电力容量机制设计与完善的关键要点探析[J]. 中国电力企业管理, 2021(4): 32-36.
Yuan Jiahai, Zhang Weirong, Yang Jiongjun.Analysis on the key points of the design and improvement of power capacity mechanism[J]. China Power Enterprise Management, 2021(4): 32-36.
[10] 孙启星, 邢栋, 张超, 等. 适应中国背景的跨省区容量市场联合出清机制[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2022, 34(10): 145-151.
Sun Qixing, Xing Dong, Zhang Chao, et al.Trans-provincial joint clearing mechanism for capacity market in China[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2022, 34(10): 145-151.
[11] Zhao Feng, Zheng Tongxin, Litvinov E.Constructing demand curves in forward capacity market[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2018, 33(1): 525-535.
[12] 张柏林, 雷绅, 吴锋, 等. 面向新能源电力系统的容量市场出清模型[J]. 电工电能新技术, 2022, 41(12): 1-8.
Zhang Bolin, Lei Shen, Wu Feng, et al.Capacity market clearing model for renewable power systems[J]. Advanced Technology of Electrical Engineering and Energy, 2022, 41(12): 1-8.
[13] 张妍, 陈启鑫, 郭鸿业, 等. 引入投资决策的电力容量市场均衡分析[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2020, 44(20): 11-18.
Zhang Yan, Chen Qixin, Guo Hongye, et al.Equilibrium analysis of power capacity market incorporating investment decision[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2020, 44(20): 11-18.
[14] 陈政, 张翔, 马子明, 等. 引导电力供需长期有效均衡的容量市场设计[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(8): 164-172.
Chen Zheng, Zhang Xiang, Ma Ziming, et al.A capacity market design guiding the long-term effective balance of power supply and demand[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(8): 164-172.
[15] 丁涛, 孙嘉玮, 黄雨涵, 等. 储能参与容量市场的国内外现状及机制思考[J/OL]. 电力系统自动化, 2023: 1-22. (2023-04-25). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1180.TP.20230424.1608.006.html.
Ding Tao, Sun Jiawei, Huang Yuhan, et al. Domestic and foreign present situation of capacity market with energy storage and thought on its mechanism[J/OL]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2023: 1-22. (2023-04-25). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1180.TP.20230424.1608.006.html.
[16] 麻秀范, 陈静, 余思雨, 等. 计及容量市场的用户侧储能优化配置研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(19): 4028-4037.
Ma Xiufan, Chen Jing, Yu Siyu, et al.Research on user side energy storage optimization configuration considering capacity market[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(19): 4028-4037.
[17] Liu Yingqi.Demand response and energy efficiency in the capacity resource procurement: case studies of forward capacity markets in ISO New England, PJM and Great Britain[J]. Energy Policy, 2017, 100: 271-282.
[18] Neuhoff K, De Vries L.Insufficient incentives for investment in electricity generations[J]. Utilities Policy, 2004, 12(4): 253-267.
[19] 北极星售电网. “拉闸限电”频发?—关于高比例新能源情况下电力供应充裕度的探讨[EB/OL].[2021-02-22]. https://news.bjx.com.cn/html/20210222/1137394.shtml.
[20] 陈雨果, 张轩, 张兰, 等. 南方(以广东起步)电力容量市场机制设计探讨[J]. 广东电力, 2020, 33(2): 45-53.
Chen Yuguo, Zhang Xuan, Zhang Lan, et al.Discussion on mechanism design of Southern China (starting from Guangdong) power capacity market[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2020, 33(2): 45-53.
[21] 山东省发展和改革委员会.关于电力现货市场容量补偿电价有关事项的通知(鲁发改价格〔2022〕247号)文[EB/OL].[2022-03-30].https://fgw.shandong.gov.cn/art/2022/3/30/art_91687_10347028.html.
[22] 广东省能源局, 国家能源局南方监管局. 广东电力市场容量补偿管理办法(试行)[EB/OL]. (2020-11-30) [2020-12-01].https://shoudian.bjx.com.cn/html/20201216/1122564.shtms.
[23] 云南省发展和改革委员会.云南省燃煤发电市场化改革实施方案(试行)(云发改价格〔2022〕1354号)文[EB/OL].[2022-12-19]. http://yndrc.yn.gov.cn/qtwj/81788.
[24] 王蓓蓓, 亢丽君, 苗曦云, 等. 考虑可信度的新能源及需求响应参与英美容量市场分析及思考[J]. 电网技术, 2022, 46(4): 1233-1247.
Wang Beibei, Kang Lijun, Miao Xiyun, et al.Analysis and enlightenment of renewable energy and demand response participating in UK and US capacity markets considering capacity credibility[J]. Power System Technology, 2022, 46(4): 1233-1247.
[25] 田雪沁, 刘壮壮, 王茜, 等. 顺应节能降碳发展趋势的容量市场机制及竞标策略研究[J]. 节能技术, 2022, 40(5): 397-402.
Tian Xueqin, Liu Zhuangzhuang, Wang Qian, et al.Research on capacity market mechanism and bidding strategy in line with the development trend of energy saving and carbon reduction[J]. Energy Conservation Technology, 2022, 40(5): 397-402.
[26] 尚楠, 张翔, 宋艺航, 等. 适应清洁能源发展和现货市场运行的容量市场机制设计[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(22): 174-182.
Shang Nan, Zhang Xiang, Song Yihang, et al.Design of capacity market mechanism adapting to clean energy development and spot market operation[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45(22): 174-182.
[27] 陈政, 尚楠, 张翔. 兼容多目标调控需要的新型容量市场机制设计[J]. 电网技术, 2021, 45(1): 198-207.
Chen Zheng, Shang Nan, Zhang Xiang.Design of capacity market mechanism with multi-objective regulation[J]. Power System Technology, 2021, 45(1): 198-207.
[28] Byers C, Levin T, Botterud A.Capacity market design and renewable energy: performance incentives, qualifying capacity, and demand curves[J]. The Electricity Journal, 2018, 31(1): 65-74.
[29] Mastropietro P, Rodilla P, Batlle C.De-rating of wind and solar resources in capacity mechanisms: a review of international experiences[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 112: 253-262.
[30] PJM Capacity Market Operation[EB/OL]. PJM Manual 18: PJM Capacity Market.2017. Available: https://www.pjm.com/library/manuals.aspx.
[31] Ousman Abani A, Hary N, Rious V, et al.The impact of investors’ risk aversion on the performances of capacity remuneration mechanisms[J]. Energy Policy, 2018, 112: 84-97.