Abstract：A reduced mutliconductor equivalent method is studied to overcome the limitation of the traditional multiconductor transmission line(MTL) method. It can predict the crosstalk accurately in high frequency. The principle of this method is that all conductors in a multi-core cable are classified as four groups according to the terminal loads. Each group can be equivalent to one conductor which means less objects have to be considered and less computing resource are needed. Thus the 3D full-wave method can be applied to multi-conductor crosstalk problem. Then the feature selective validation (FSV) method is introduced to quantitatively validate the efficiency of this simplified method. The validation results demonstrate that the reduced algorithm improves the level of accuracy up to “Good” compared with “Poor” for the traditional MTL theory.
张刚, 王立欣, 刘超. 高频多导体串扰的简化三维全波算法及其有效性评估[J]. 电工技术学报, 2012, 27(9): 140-145.
Zhang Gang, Wang Lixin, Liu Chao. A Multiconductor Reduction 3D Full-Wave Method for High Frequency Crosstalk Problem and Its Validation. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2012, 27(9): 140-145.
[1] Paul C R. Analysis of multiconductor transmission lines[M]. New York: John willy & Sons, 1994. [2] Tesche F M, Ianoz M V, Karlsson T. EMC Analysis methods and computational methods[M]. New york: Wiley, 1997. [3] Andrieu G, KonéL, Bocquet F, et al. Multiconductor reduction technique for modeling common mode current on cable bundles at high frequency for automotive applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on EMC, 2008, 50(1): 175-184. [4] 张刚, 王立欣, 刘超. 一种求解屏蔽电缆场线耦合问题的混合方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2010, 25(5): 9-13. Zhang Gang, Wang Lixin, Liu Chao. A hybrid method for solving field-line coupling problem of shielded cables[J]. Transactions of China Electro-technical Society, 2010, 25(5): 9-13. [5] Martin A J M. Quantitative data validation[D]. Leicester: De Montfort University 1999. [6] Paul C R. 电磁兼容导论[M]. 闻映红, 译. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2007. [7] Harrington R F. Field computation by moment methods[M]. New York: Macmillan, 1968. [8] IEEE Standard for Validation of Computational Electromagnetic Computer Modeling and Simulations[S]. USA: Standards Development Committee, 2008. [9] Duffy A, Orlandi A. A review of statistical methods for comparing two data sets[J]. Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, 2008, 23(1): 90-97. [10] Duffy A P, Martin A J M, Orlandi A, et al. Feature selective validation (FSV) for validation of computational electromagnetics (CEM). Part I - The FSV method[J]. IEEE Transactions on EMC, 2006, 48(3): 449-459. [11] Orlandi A, Duffy A P, Archambeault B, et al. Feature selective validation (FSV) for validation of computational electromagnetics (CEM): Part II- assessment of FSV performance[J]. IEEE Transactions on EMC, 2006, 48(3): 460-467.
2012, Vol. 27 
