非晶合金-取向硅钢组合铁心结构设计及其磁-振动特性分析

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.230255

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (7)

Download: PDF (3763 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Amorphous alloy and oriented silicon steel are common soft magnetic materials used in manufacturing distribution transformer iron cores. Amorphous alloy with the advantage of low loss density faces challenges like low saturation flux density and large magnetostriction. Oriented silicon steel has the advantages of high saturation flux density and small magnetostriction, but its loss density is high. The opposite magnetization characteristics of the sematerials make the distribution transformer iron core difficult to simultaneously achieve low loss and low vibration. The combination of amorphous alloy and oriented silicon steel can synthesize the advantages of both materials. Specifically, the composite iron core can take advantage of the high saturation flux density of oriented silicon steel to prevent the supersaturation of amorphous alloy. The core loss is reduced by the low loss density of amorphous alloy, and the vibration of iron cores is reduced by the small magnetostriction of oriented silicon steel. Therefore, it is essential to design the structural parameters of the composite iron core and rationally allocate the proportion of amorphous alloy and oriented silicon steel to reduce the core loss and vibration indistribution transformer iron cores.
In the composite iron core, the amorphous alloy part adopts a planar wound iron core structure, and the oriented silicon steel part adopts aplanar stack iron core structure. The exciting coil bypasses both iron cores to realize simultaneous excitation. According to the structure of the composite iron core and the magnetization saturation characteristics of amorphous alloy and oriented silicon steel, an equivalent dual nonlinear magnetic circuit model is established, and the iterative calculation method of flux density distribution is proposed. On this basis, the free parameter scanning method is used to design the structural parameters of the composite iron core. Firstly, the value range of free parameters is set. Secondly, all candidate-free parameter sets are determined by arrangement and combination. Each group of free parameters represents a composite iron core structure scheme. Finally, the flux density distribution of the composite iron core in each scheme is iteratively calculated. Based on the constraint that the flux density of the oriented silicon steel iron core is higher than that of the amorphous alloy iron core, feasible structural design scheme sets are determined.
A composite iron core is designed, and an experimental prototype is manufactured according to the design results. The calculated and measured results of the flux density distribution of the composite iron core are compared. The mean relative error of the flux density for the composite iron core is 1.747%, for the amorphous alloy iron core is 3.129%, and for the oriented silicon steel iron core is 7.663%, which verifies the proposed method. The no-load loss of the pure amorphous alloy core is 29.064 W, the pure silicon steel core is 109.810 W, and the composite core is 35.327 W. Compared with the pure oriented silicon steel iron core, the no-load loss of the composite iron core is reduced by 67.829%. The vibration displacement of the pure-amorphous alloy iron core is the largest, with a peak value of 1.085 μm. The composite iron core is the second, with a peak value of0.785 μm. The pure oriented silicon steel iron core is the smallest, with a peak value of0.019 μm. Compared with the pure amorphous alloy iron core, the vibration displacement peak of the composite iron core is reduced by 38.200%.

Key words： Amorphous alloy and oriented silicon steel composite iron core free parameter scanning method structure design dual nonlinear magnetic circuit model magnetic-vibration characteristics

Received: 06 March 2023 Published: 07 June 2024

PACS:

TM201.4

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Chen Hao
	Li Lin

Cite this article:

Chen Hao,Li Lin. Structure Design and Magnetic-Vibration Characteristics Analysis of Amorphous Alloy and Oriented Silicon Steel Composite Iron Core[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(10): 2925-2936.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.230255 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2024/V39/I10/2925

[1] 杨北超, 范学鑫, 王瑞田, 等. 考虑铁心非线性的三相立体卷铁心变压器建模及空载特性分析[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(9): 2263-2274.
Yang Beichao, Fan Xuexin, Wang Ruitian, et al.Modeling and no-load characteristics analysis of 3D wound coretransformer considering core non- linearity[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(9): 2263-2274.
[2] Liu Gang, Liu Cong, Xiong Xiaofu, et al.Simulation of the magnetic field distribution and voltage error- characteristics of the three-phase three-component combinedtransformer with new three-cylinder core structure[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2020, 56(4): 1-4.
[3] Romaric K N, Liu Daosheng, Du Boxue.Investigation on vibration characteristics of amorphous metal alloy core dry-type distribution transformer[J]. CES Transa- ctions on Electrical Machines and Systems, 2022, 6(3): 324-331.
[4] 冯月磊, 刘洋, 李琳, 等. 考虑磁致伸缩效应的非晶合金立体卷铁心振动仿真与实验研究[J]. 电工电能新技术, 2022, 41(3): 15-22.
Feng Yuelei, Liu Yang, Li Lin, et al.Vibration simulation and experiment of amorphous alloy three- dimensional wound core considering magnetostrictive effect[J]. Advanced Technology of Electrical Engin- eering and Energy, 2022, 41(3): 15-22.
[5] Kurita N, Nishimizu A, Morooka H, et al.Demon- stration of loss-reduction effect of the amorphous coresfor larger-capacity transformers by trial manufa- cture[J]. Electrical Engineering in Japan, 2018, 204(1): 12-21.
[6] Kobayashi C, Kurita N, Nishimizu A, et al.Demon- stration of loss reduction effect of 66 kV-classed 30 MVA three phase hybrid-core transformer by trialmanufacture[J]. Electrical Engineering in Japan, 2021, 214(1): 26-34.
[7] Pytlech R.Mixed D-core with a distributed air gap as an alternative formedium voltage instrument trans- formers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2010, 46(10): 3816-3825.
[8] Guan Weimin, Zhang Di, Yang Mu, et al.Flux and loss distribution in iron coreswith hybrid T-joint[J]. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 2019, 29(2): 1-4.
[9] Gao Yanhui, Ichimaru S, Miyabe T, et al.Proposal of core structures for iron loss and noise reduction of three-phase reactor with anisotropic iron core[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2021, 57(2): 1-5.
[10] Kefalas T D, Kladas A G.FEM package for iron loss evaluation and minimization of two grade lamination- wound cores[J]. Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials, 2008, 10(5): 1197-1202.
[11] Kefalas T D, Georgilakis P S, Kladas A G, et al.Multiple grade lamination wound core: a novel technique for transformer iron loss minimization using simulated annealing with restarts and an anisotropy model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2008, 44(6): 1082-1085.
[12] Hernández I, Olivares-Galván J C, Georgilakis P S, et al. A novel octagonal wound core for distribution transformer svalidated by electromagnetic field analysis and comparison with conventional wound core[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2010, 46(5): 1251-1258.
[13] Kefalas T D, Kladas A G.Development of distri- bution transformers assembled of composite wound cores[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2012, 48(2): 775-778.
[14] Kefalas T D, Kladas A G.Mixed Si-Fe wound cores five legged transformer: losses and flux distribution analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2012, 48(4): 1609-1612.
[15] Kefalas T D, Magdaleno-Adame S.Techno-economic comparative evaluation of mixed and conventional magnetic wound cores for three-phase distribution transformers[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2018, 155: 331-339.
[16] Kurita N, Nishimizu A, Kobayashi C, et al.Magnetic properties of simultaneously excited amorphousand silicon steel hybrid cores for higherefficiency distribution transformers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2018, 54(11): 1-4.
[17] 张希蔚. 软磁材料高频磁特性测量与模拟方法研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2022.
[18] 贲彤, 方敏, 陈龙, 等. 非晶合金铁心电抗器减振结构的电磁-机械耦合拓扑优化[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(24): 6553-6564.
Ben Tong, Fang Min, Chen Long, et al.Optimization of magnetic-mechanical coupling topology for vibration damping structures of amorphous alloy core reactor[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(24): 6553-6564.
[19] 陈彬, 李琳, 赵志斌, 等. 电感集成式大容量高频变压器精细化设计方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(5): 1356-1368.
Chen Bin, Li Lin, Zhao Zhibin, et al.Design method of inductor-integrated high-power high-frequency transformer[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(5): 1356-1368.
[20] 王佳宁, 邹强, 胡嘉汶, 等. 一种中压绝缘大功率中频变压器的优化设计方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(12): 3048-3060.
Wang Jianing, Zou Qiang, Hu Jiawen, et al.An optimal design method for medium-voltage insulated high-powermedium-frequency transformer[J]. Transa- ctions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(12): 3048-3060.
[21] 迟青光, 张艳丽, 陈吉超, 等. 非晶合金铁心损耗与磁致伸缩特性测量与模拟[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(18): 3876-3883.
Chi Qingguang, Zhang Yanli, Chen Jichao, et al.Measurement and modeling of loss and magneto- strictive propertiesfor the amorphous alloy core[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(18): 3876-3883.
[22] Li Yang, Zhu Jianguo, Li Yongjian, et al.Modeling dynamic magnetostriction of amorphous core mate- rials based on Jiles-Atherton theory for finite element simulations[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials,2021,529:1-11.
[23] 王振, 张艳丽, 龚圆, 等. 机械应力下无取向电工钢片磁致伸缩特性研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(21): 5682-5690.
Wang Zhen, Zhang Yanli, Gong Yuan, et al.Study on magnetostrictive properties of non-oriented electrical steel sheet under mechanical stress[J].Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(21): 5682-5690.
[24] 张鹏宁, 李琳, 程志光, 等. 并联电抗器与变压器模型铁心振动仿真与试验对比[J]. 电工技术学报, 2018, 33(22): 5273-5281.
Zhang Pengning, Li Lin, Cheng Zhiguang, et al.Vibration simulation and experiment comparison of shunt reactor and transformer model core[J]. Transa- ctions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2018, 33(22): 5273-5281.