火箭触发闪电的回击电流及电场特征分析

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.221864

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2725 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Lightning faults are one of the main causes of tripping of transmission lines. Obtaining real lightning parameters is crucial for lightning protection in power systems. One of the reasonable and effective means is triggered lightning test. Due to differences in climatic conditions and cloud charge distribution, lightning discharge parameters vary somewhat from region to region. There are relatively few relevant experimental studies in China, and there is a need to accumulate more lightning discharge data from different regions. To determine how lightning discharge occur, to provide accurate lightning discharge parameters needed for lightning protection work. To study and test lightning strike mechanisms and to evaluate the performance of lightning location systems.
Rocket-triggered lightning test was conducted in Guangzhou in summer 2019. Lightning-triggered rockets were launched under suitable thunderstorm weather conditions to trigger upward negative polarity lightning. The lightning current flowed through the priming rod through a coaxial shunt with a resistance value of 1 mΩ and then flowed to ground. Thereby obtaining a realistic lightning current waveform. And three flat plate capacitor antennas were set up at 58 m, 90 m and 1600 m from the rocket launcher as the measurements of the vertical electric field of the lightning. Studying the trend of electric field waveform parameters with distance and the relationship between current parameters and electric field parameters.
A total of 14 flashes were successfully triggered, with a total of 74 return strokes, an average of 5.3 return strokes, and a maximum of 14 return strokes for a single flash. Defining six current waveform parameters and plotting the parameter distributions. The geometric mean values of the interval time of return strokes, peak current, 10%~90% rise time, half-peak width, 1 ms transferred charge and 1 ms action integral were 38.45 ms, 12.38 kA, 0.25 μs, 8.31 μs, 0.68 C, and 2.12×10³ A²·s, respectively. The relationship between the current parameters was investigated. Both the 1 ms transferred charge and the 1 ms action integral were correlated with the peak current as a power function. The distributions of five electric field characteristic parameters at different distances, including leader electric field peak, return stroke electric field peak, 10%~90% rise time, half-width time and inverse peak ratio, were counted. By normalizing the peak current to 15 kA, it was found that the leader electric field peak and return stroke electric field peak would decrease with increasing distance, while the 10%~90% rise time and half-peak width of the electric field would increase. The return stroke electric field peak showed a power function decrease with increasing distance. The peak current showed a certain linear correlation with both the leader electric field peak and return stroke electric field peak at different distances. And the larger the distance, the better the linear fit. This was caused by the fact that the electric field at close distances is dominated by electrostatic and radiation fields, and the electric field at far distances is dominated by radiation fields. The current and electric field waveform data reported in this paper provide reliable data support for testing the lightning return stroke model and lightning protection.

Key words： Rocket-triggered lightning current electric field return stroke

Received: 04 October 2022

PACS:

TM863

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Cai Li
	Du Yiyang
	Peng Xiangyang
	Zhou Mi
	Wang Jianguo

Cite this article:

Cai Li,Du Yiyang,Peng Xiangyang等. Analysis of the Current and Electric Field Characteristics of Rocket-Triggered Lightning Return Strokes[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(1): 257-266.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.221864 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2024/V39/I1/257

[1] Orville R.The art and science of lightning protection[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2009, 90(7): 1022.
[2] 王红斌, 程思, 范伟男, 等. 雷暴活动全闪电定位及空间演变过程分析[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(2): 373-379.
Wang Hongbin, Cheng Si, Fan Weinan, et al.Total lightning location of thunderstorm activities and spatial evolution process analysis[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(2): 373-379.
[3] 张文锋, 李志伟, 张国建, 等. 山区35kV架空线路雷击特性仿真分析[J]. 电气技术, 2022, 23(9): 19-28.
Zhang Wenfeng, Li Zhiwei, Zhang Guojian, et al.Simulation analysis on lightning strike characteristics of 35kV overhead lines in mountainous area[J]. Electrical Engineering, 2022, 23(9): 19-28.
[4] 周蜜, 丁文汉, 王建国, 等. 闪电连接高度对地面电场波形的影响[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(4): 857-868.
Zhou Mi, Ding Wenhan, Wang Jianguo, et al.Effect of lightning junction height on ground electric field waveform[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(4): 857-868.
[5] 袁涛, 左思家, 司马文霞, 等. 紧凑型多腔室并联间隙雷电冲击闪络路径约束研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(11): 2989-2998.
Yuan Tao, Zuo Sijia, Sima Wenxia, et al.Research on lightning flashover path constraints of compact multi-chamber parallel gap[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(11): 2989-2998.
[6] Li Quanxin, Rachidi F, Rubinstein M, et al. Measurement and modeling of both distant and close electric fields of an M-component in rocket-triggered lightning[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2020, 125(21): e2019JD032300.
[7] Rakov V A, Uman M A.Lightning: physics and effects[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[8] Hubert P, Laroche P, Eybert-Berard A, et al.Triggered lightning in new Mexico[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1984, 89(D2): 2511-2521.
[9] Fisher R J, Schnetzer G H, Thottappillil R, et al.Parameters of triggered-lightning flashes in Florida and Alabama[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1993, 98(D12): 22887-22902.
[10] Le Vine D M, Willett J C, Bailey J C. Comparison of fast electric field changes from subsequent return strokes of natural and triggered lightning[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1989, 94(D11): 13259-13265.
[11] Schoene J, Uman M A, Rakov V A.Return stroke peak current versus charge transfer in rocket-triggered lightning[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2010, 115(D12): D12107.
[12] 郄秀书, 杨静, 蒋如斌, 等. 山东人工引发雷电综合观测实验及回击电流特征[J]. 大气科学, 2012, 36(1): 77-88.
Qie Xiushu, Yang Jing, Jiang Rubin, et al.Shandong artificially triggering lightning experiment and current characterization of return stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 2012, 36(1): 77-88.
[13] 张义军, 张阳, 郑栋, 等. 2008—2014年广东人工触发闪电电流特征[J]. 高电压技术, 2016, 42(11): 3404-3414.
Zhang Yijun, Zhang Yang, Zheng Dong, et al.Current characteristcs of triggered lightnings in Guangdong from 2008 to 2014[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2016, 42(11): 3404-3414.
[14] Miki M, Rakov V A, Rambo K J, et al. Electric fields near triggered lightning channels measured with Pockels sensors[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2002, 107(D16): ACL2-1.
[15] Nag A, Mallick S, Rakov V A, et al.Evaluation of U.S. National Lightning Detection Network performance characteristics using rocket-triggered lightning data acquired in 2004-2009[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2011, 116(D2): D02123.
[16] Schoene J, Uman M A, Rakov V A, et al.Statistical characteristics of the electric and magnetic fields and their time derivatives 15 m and 30 m from triggered lightning[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2003, 108(D6): 4192.
[17] Mallick S, Rakov V A, Hill J D, et al.Performance characteristics of the NLDN for return strokes and pulses superimposed on steady currents, based on rocket-triggered lightning data acquired in Florida in 2004-2012[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2014, 119(7): 3825-3856.
[18] Qie Xiushu, Zhao Yang, Zhang Qilin, et al.Characteristics of triggered lightning during Shandong artificial triggering lightning experiment (SHATLE)[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2009, 91(2/3/4): 310-315.
[19] 陈怀飞, 王宇, 孙通, 等. 风机回击电磁场波形特征及辐射增强效应研究[J]. 高电压技术, 2020, 46(6): 2122-2130.
Chen Huaifei, Wang Yu, Sun Tong, et al.Study on waveform characteristics and radiation enhancement effect of lightning return stroke initiated from wind turbine[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2020, 46(6): 2122-2130.
[20] Cai Li, Li Jin, Wang Jianguo, et al. Differences between flashes with and without return strokes in rocket-triggered lightning[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2021, 48(11): e2021GL093483.
[21] Zheng Dong, Zhang Yijun, Zhang Yang, et al.Characteristics of the initial stage and return stroke currents of rocket-triggered lightning flashes in Southern China[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2017, 122(12): 6431-6452.
[22] Schoene J, Uman M A, Rakov V A, et al.Characterization of return-stroke currents in rocket-triggered lightning[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2009, 114(D3): D03106.
[23] Yang Jing, Qie Xiushu, Zhang Guangshu, et al.Characteristics of channel base currents and close magnetic fields in triggered flashes in SHATLE[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2010, 115(D23): D23102.
[24] Schoene J, Uman M A, Rakov V A, et al.Test of the transmission line model and the traveling current source model with triggered lightning return strokes at very close range[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2003, 108(D23): 4737.
[25] 张其林, 刘明远, 杨璟, 等. 近距离地闪电场变化及对通道电荷密度分布的响应[J]. 气象学报, 2012, 70(4): 847-854.
Zhang Qilin, Liu Mingyuan, Yang Jing, et al.Characteristics of the close leader/return stroke electric field change and its response to the corresponding charge density along the lightning channel[J]. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2012, 70(4): 847-854.
[26] 郄秀书, 张其林, 袁铁. 雷电物理学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013.
[27] Li Quanxin, Wang Jianguo, Cai Li, et al.On the return-stroke current estimation of Foshan Total Lightning Location System (FTLLS)[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2021, 248: 105194.