|
|
|
| Research on Triggering Characteristics of Triple-Gap Laser Triggered Vacuum Switch |
| Song Xinzhe1, Liao Minfu1, Lu Gang1, Ma Hui1, Han Xiaotao2 |
1. School of Electrical Engineering Dalian University of Technology Dalian 116024 China;
2. National Center for Pulsed Magnetic Field Science Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430074 China |
|
|
|
Abstract High-voltage laser-triggered vacuum switches have good application prospects in pulsed power systems. Laser-triggered vacuum switch (LTVS) is a new pulsed power closed switch that combines pulsed laser technology with vacuum switching technology. Compared with laser-triggered gas switches, laser-triggered vacuum switches can obtain similar or even better delay characteristics under the same conditions while avoiding a series of technical problems of gas switches. As the application areas of pulsed power technology continue to expand and system capacity grows, LTVS has the potential to become a switching device for high power applications. In this paper, a multi-gap laser-triggered vacuum switch is designed, including a laser-triggered gap and two symmetrical curling stainless steel electrodes in series. Based on the detachable vacuum chamber, a laser-triggered multi-gap vacuum switch test platform was built, and triggering characteristics of the multi-gap switch were experimentally studied under different laser energies, different operating voltages, and different voltage split ratios. The delay characteristics of the three-gap laser trigger switch are compared and analyzed, the main factors affecting the delay characteristics of the multi-gap series switch are explored, and the optimization design scheme of the working parameters of the high-performance multi-gap switch is obtained. The experimental results show that the trigger delay time of the multi-gap switch is not only related to the external working conditions, but also affected by the working parameters among the three gaps. With the increase of laser energy and operating voltage, the trigger delay and jitter time of the switch decrease. Better time-delay characteristics can be obtained by matching with appropriate working parameters. The on-trigger delay of the three-gap LTVS is determined by the on-delay of each gap and is mainly affected by the delay of its first self-breakdown gap. The remaining self-breakdown gap can be quickly turned on at a steeper impulse voltage.
The voltage division ratio of each gap of the three-gap LTVS has a significant impact on the working delay of the switch, and the change of the voltage division ratio will change the rate of increase of the superimposed shock voltage during the trigger process, which will make the switch on rate different. When the laser energy and operating voltage are high, the trigger gap has a higher voltage division ratio, and the switching trigger performance is relatively good. The trigger delay of the three-gap LTVS gradually decreases with the increase of laser energy and operating voltage. That is, LTVS can obtain better trigger performance at higher laser energy and working voltage. The trigger-on characteristics of the three-gap laser trigger vacuum switch can be improved by increasing the laser energy and working voltage and changing the divider voltage ratio. The on-time delay of the three-gap LTVS can be controlled at (167±3) ns when the laser energy is 30 mJ, the operating voltage is 30 kV, and the partial voltage ratio is 411. This paper can lay the foundation for the study of high-performance laser-triggered multi-stage vacuum switches in higher voltage fields.
|
|
Received: 30 May 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Bulygin V S, Sullivan D L, Gahl J M, et al.Laser- triggered vacuum switch[J]. Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys., 1975, 20(4): 561-565.
[2] 樊文芳, 何正浩, 王英, 等. 一种激光触发真空开关的触发特性研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(20): 5360-5366.
Fan Wenfang, He Zhenghao, Wang Ying, et al.Experiment research on the trigger characteristics of a laser-triggered vacuum switch[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(20): 5360-5366.
[3] Harley L M, Barnes G A.Low-jitter, high-voltage, infrared, laser-triggered, vacuum switch[C]//Eighth IEEE International Conference on Pulsed Power, San Diego, CA, USA, 2002: 900-903.
[4] Fukushi I, Watanabe M, Hotta E, et al.Characteristics of laser-triggered vacuum switch[C]//19th Inter- national Symposium on Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, Xi'an, China, 2002: 511-514.
[5] Watanabe M, Maehara J, Fukushi I, et al.Behaviour of ablated plasma in laser-triggered vacuum switch[C]// IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2001: 1425-1428.
[6] 赵通, 廖敏夫, 陈占清, 等. 不同极性激光触发真空开关触发机制研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(15): 3341-3347.
Zhao Tong, Liao Minfu, Chen Zhanqing, et al.Research on the triggering mechanism of laser triggered vacuum switch with different polarities[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(15): 3341-3347.
[7] 赵岩, 廖敏夫, 段雄英, 等. 激光触发真空开关触发稳定性及时延特性[J]. 电工技术学报, 2017, 32(13): 178-184.
Zhao Yan, Liao Minfu, Duan Xiongying, et al.Laser triggered stability and time delay characteristics of laser triggered vacuum switch[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2017, 32(13): 178-184.
[8] 江伟华. 高重复频率脉冲功率技术及其应用: (7)主要技术问题和未来发展趋势[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2015, 27(1): 16-20.
Jiang Weihua.Repetition rate pulsed power tech- nology and its applications: (Ⅶ) major challenges and future trends[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27(1): 16-20.
[9] Savage M E, Austin K N, Hutsel B T, et al.Pulsed power performance of the Z machine: ten years after the upgrade[C]//2017 IEEE 21st International Con- ference on Pulsed Power (PPC), Brighton, UK, 2018: 1-6.
[10] 廖敏夫, 董华庆, 陈占清, 等. 不同电极激光触发真空开关高频开断能力研究[J]. 高电压技术, 2020, 46(7): 2578-2585.
Liao Minfu, Dong Huaqing, Chen Zhanqing, et al.Research on high-frequency interruption capacity of LTVS with different electrodes[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2020, 46(7): 2578-2585.
[11] Kim A, Frolov S, Alexeenko V, et al.Prefire probability of the switch type Fast LTD[C]//2009 IEEE Pulsed Power Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 2010: 565-570.
[12] Woodworth J R, Fowler W E, Stoltzfus B S, et al.Compact 810 kA linear transformer driver cavity[J]. Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams, 2011, 14(4): 040401.
[13] 张颖, 王景芹, 康慧玲, 等. 金属掺杂AgSnO2触头材料的仿真与实验[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(8): 1587-1595.
Zhang Ying, Wang Jingqin, Kang Huiling, et al.Simulation and experiment of metal-doped AgSnO2 contact material[J]. Transactions of China Electro- technical Society, 2021, 36(8): 1587-1595.
[14] 南江, 刘诚威, 夏平安. 聚四氟乙烯/纳米碳化硅改性复合材料的制备及其介电特性[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(增刊1): 1-7.
Nan Jiang, Liu Chengwei, Xia Ping'an. Preparation and dielectric characteristics of nano-SiC/PTFE composite[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(S1): 1-7.
[15] 姚睿丰, 王妍, 高景晖, 等. 压电材料与器件在电气工程领域的应用[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(7): 1324-1337.
Yao Ruifeng, Wang Yan, Gao Jinghui, et al.Appli- cations of piezoelectric materials and devices in electric engineering[J]. Transactions of China Elec- trotechnical Society, 2021, 36(7): 1324-1337.
[16] 周朕蕊, 韩冬, 赵明月, 等. 电晕放电下C5F10O混合气体的分解特性[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(2): 407-416.
Zhou Zhenrui, Han Dong, Zhao Mingyue, et al.Decomposition characteristics of C5F10O mixtures under corona discharge[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(2): 407-416.
[17] 张志劲, 梁田, 向缨竹, 等. 去粉化对硅橡胶复合绝缘子性能的影响[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(8): 2126-2135.
Zhang Zhijin, Liang Tian, Xiang Yingzhu, et al.Effect of de-powdering on the performance of silicone rubber composite insulator[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(8): 2126-2135.
[18] 程显, 廖敏夫, 段雄英, 等. 基于光控真空断路器模块串联的126 kV三断口真空断路器设计与试验[J]. 高电压技术, 2015, 41(9): 3110-3116.
Cheng Xian, Liao Minfu, Duan Xiongying, et al.Design and experiment of 126 kV vacuum circuit breaker based on fiber-controlled vacuum interrupter modules in series[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2015, 41(9): 3110-3116. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 38 
