风机叶片气动脉冲除冰结构脱冰计算模型及试验验证

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.220520

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (7981 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract

With the development of low-carbon power system construction, the development speed of wind energy power generation systems is further improved. In cold regions, available wind power is approximately 10% higher than in other regions, due to the increased air density caused by lower temperatures. However, wind turbines built in these places are facing severe icing problems. Ice accretion on wind turbine blades can reduce electric production, and cause unwanted vibration, thus reducing the lifetime of wind turbines. Therefore, it is necessary to apply ice protection techniques to wind turbines.
Inspired by the rubber de-icing boot used on aircraft wings, a new structural pneumatic impulse de-icing method was proposed. This method uses modified epoxy resin to cure the expandable flat tube into the protected structure. According to this method, a de-icing calculation model was proposed to guide the subsequent parameter optimization of the de-icing structure. To verify the accuracy of the de-icing calculation model and the de-icing feasibility of the new method, icing, and de-icing tests were carried out in an artificial climate chamber. During the icing test, the thickness of the ice layer covering the test sample included 1 mm, 2 mm, and 3 mm, and the icing temperature included -4℃, -8℃, and -12℃. In the de-icing test, the de-icing inflation pressure and de-icing area ratio are used to evaluate the de-icing effects of the sample.
Before the de-icing test, the transverse bonding stress between the ice layer and aluminum skin under different icing conditions was measured. As the icing temperature goes down, the transverse bonding stress shows an increasing trend. The measured transverse bonding stress is 0.238 MPa, 0.328 MPa, and 0.37 MPa respectively when the temperature is -4℃, -8℃, and -12℃. With the thickness of the ice layer increasing, the transverse bonding stress gets larger gradually. The measured transverse bonding stress is 0.178 MPa, 0.218 MPa, and 0.37 MPa respectively when the ice thickness is 1 mm, 2 mm, and 3 mm.
According to the de-icing test results, it is found that: (1) With the increase of ice thickness, the average deicing inflation pressure required by the test sample increases obviously, but the de-icing area ratio decreases. The reason for the increase in average de-icing pressure is the increase in transverse bonding stress between the ice layer and the aluminum skin and the deviation of the neutral layer of the composite beam towards the interface of the ice layer and the aluminum skin. (2) With the decrease in the icing temperature, the average de-icing pressure required by the test sample increases, while the de-icing area ratio decreases. The reason for this result is the increase of the elastic modulus of the ice layer and the transverse bonding stress.
By comparing the de-icing area ratio results obtained by the calculation model and the de-icing test, it is found that the calculation model can accurately calculate the ice-shedding area. Based on the verified de-icing calculation model, it is found that the de-icing area ratio can be improved by increasing the elastic modulus or the thickness of the deformable layer. However, the two structure parameters should not be increased blindly, which may lead to an increase in the average de-icing inflation pressure, thus increasing energy consumption.

Key words： Wind turbine icing de-icing calculation model pneumatic impulse de-icing

Received: 06 April 2022

PACS:

TM315

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Yu Zhou
	Shu Lichun
	Hu Qin
	Jiang Xingliang
	Li Hanxiang

Cite this article:

Yu Zhou,Shu Lichun,Hu Qin等. De-icing Calculation Model of Pneumatic Impulse De-icing Structure for Wind Turbine Blades and Experiment Verification[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 0, (): 230640-230640.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.220520 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y0/V/I/230640

[1] 王涛, 诸自强, 年珩. 非理想电网下双馈风力发电系统运行技术综述[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(3): 455-471.
Wang Tao, Zhu Ziqiang, Nian Heng.Review of operation technology of doubly-fed induction generator-based wind power system under nonideal grid conditions[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(3): 455-471.
[2] 徐海亮, 吴瀚, 李志, 等. 低短路比电网下含负序控制双馈风机稳定性研究的几个关键问题[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(22): 4688-4702.
Xu Hailiang, Wu Han, Li Zhi, et al.Several key issues on stability study of DFIG-based wind turbines with negative sequence control during low short-circuit ratio power grids[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(22): 4688-4702.
[3] 蔡旭, 杨仁炘, 周剑桥, 等. 海上风电直流送出与并网技术综述[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(21): 2-22.
Cai Xu, Yang Renxin, Zhou Jianqiao, et al.Review on offshore wind power integration via DC transmission[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45(21): 2-22.
[4] 颜湘武, 王德胜, 杨琳琳, 等. 直驱风机惯量支撑与一次调频协调控制策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(15): 3282-3292.
Yan Xiangwu, Wang Desheng, Yang Linlin, et al.Coordinated control strategy of inertia support and primary frequency regulation of PMSG[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(15): 3282-3292.
[5] 杨光亚. 欧洲海上风电工程实践回顾及未来技术展望[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(21): 23-32.
Yang Guangya.Review on engineering practices and future technology prospects of European offshore wind power[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45(21): 23-32.
[6] 姜磊, 高景晖, 钟力生, 等. 远海漂浮式海上风电平台用动态海缆的发展[J]. 高压电器, 2022, 58(01): 1-11.
Jiang Lei, Gao Jinghui, Zhong Lisheng, et al.Development of dynamic submarine cable for offshore floating wind power platforms[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2022, 58(01): 1-11.
[7] 蔡国伟, 雷宇航, 葛维春, 等. 高寒地区风电机组雷电防护研究综述[J]. 电工技术学报, 2019, 34(22): 4804-4815.
Cai Guowei, Lei Yuhang, Ge Weichun, et al.Review of research on lightning protection for wind turbines in alpine areas[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2019, 34(22): 4804-4815.
[8] 胡琴, 杨大川, 蒋兴良, 等. 叶片模拟冰对风力发电机功率特性影响的试验研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(22): 4807-4815.
Hu Qin, Yang Dachuan, Jiang Xingliang, et al.Experimental study on the effect of blade simulated icing on power characteristics of wind turbine[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(22): 4807-4815.
[9] Yu Songsong, Zhang Dayong, Wang Shuaifei, et al.Field monitoring of offshore wind turbine foundations in ice regions[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2020, 104(sp1): 343-350 [10] Parent O, Ilinca A. Anti-icing and de-icing techniques for wind turbines: Critical review[J]. Cold Regions Science & Technology, 2010, 65(1): 88-96.
[11] Jiang Guo, Chen Liang, Zhang Shuidong, et al.Superhydrophobic SiC/CNTs coatings with photothermal deicing and passive anti-icing properties[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(42): 36505-36511.
[12] Gao Shuhui, Liu Bo, Peng Jie, et al.Icephobic durability of branched PDMS slippage coatings Cocross- linked by functionalized POSS[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(4): 4654-4666.
[13] Yu Yadong, Chen Lei, Weng Ding, et al.A promising self-assembly PTFE coating for effective large-scale deicing[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2020, 147: 105732.
[14] Mayer C, Ilinca A, Fortin G, et al.Wind tunnel study of electro-thermal de-icing of wind turbine blades[J]. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 2007, 17(3): 182-188.
[15] Luo Yongshui, Liu Jian, Chen Qi, et al.Research control strategy of hot air blower de-icing system for MW wind turbine blade[J]. International Conference on Renewable Energy & Environmental Technology, 2017, 112:275-284.
[16] Jiang Xingliang, Wang Yangyang.Studies on the electro-impulse de-icing system of aircraft[J]. Aerospace, 2019, 6(6): 67.
[17] Palacios J, Wolfe D, Bailey M, et al.Ice testing of a centrifugally powered pneumatic deicing system for helicopter rotor blades[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2015, 60(3): 1-12.
[18] Weisend N A Jr. Design of an advanced pneumatic deicer for the composite rotor blade[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1989, 26(10): 947-950.
[19] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 22315—2008 金属材料弹性模量和泊松比试验方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009.
[20] Plastics — Determination of flexural properties:ISO 178-2019[S]. ISO, 2019.4.
[21] 唐静静, 范钦珊. 工程力学:静力学和材料力学[M]. 3 版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2017.