永磁同步电机的两种反馈式弱磁控制方法的稳定性比较研究

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.221389

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1856 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract

For permanent magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs), the speed operation range can be hardly extended due to the increasing back electromotive force and the limited DC link voltage. To extend the speed operation range and maximize the torque capability, the flux-weakening method is normally employed. Based on the conventional current vector control system, the flux-weakening control methods can be achieved in both feedforward and feedback manners. Compared to feedforward type flux-weakening control method, feedback type flux-weakening control method is simple and more robust in performance against parameter mismatches. For feedback type flux-weakening control, there are two main control methods, i.e. dq-axis currents based feedback flux-weakening control (DQFFC) and current amplitude and angle based feedback flux-weakening control (CAAFFC), these two different control methods are widely used and normally considered to be equivalent to each other. In this paper, the system stabilities of the two methods are comparatively studied by considering maximum torque per voltage (MTPV) control and over-modulation, and the control parameter design for DQFFC and CAAFFC is discussed.
In this paper, firstly, based on the current vector control system, the basic principles of the two feedback-type flux-weakening methods are introduced, and the operation modes and regions of the two flux-weakening control methods are defined and illustrated. Secondly, the voltage feedback control loops of DQFFC and CAAFFC are generalized and linearized, and the corresponding transfer functions are derived. Thirdly, based on the derived transfer function, the stability characteristics of the two flux-weakening control methods are analyzed by applying the Routh stability criterion. In the analysis, the stabilities of the two flux-weakening control methods at different operation regions are compared and illustrated from the perspective of d- and q-axis current regulations. Based on the stability analysis, control parameters for DQFFC and CAAFFC are designed, respectively. The analysis indicates that DQFFC and CAAFFC show different stability characteristics in different regions. Moreover, it is found that the instabilities can be caused by not only the control parameters of flux-weakening control methods but also the flux-weakening control methods inherently.
From both the theoretical analysis and experiment results, it can be confirmed that the instability characteristics can be different between these two flux-weakening control methods in two different operation regions. Firstly, when the current is approaching the MTPV curve, the DQFFC method has a weak voltage regulation capability, since only d-axis current can be regulated, which prevents the current from moving inside the voltage limit circle. This could lead to oscillation in over modulation. On the other hand, the CAAFFC method mainly regulates the q-axis current in this region, allowing the current to move within the voltage limit circle. Thus, the oscillation can be alleviated. Secondly, when the machine operates under a light load condition, for CAAFFC method, it mainly regulates the q-axis current and the current is unable to move inside the voltage limit circle, which causes an unstable transition between motoring and generating modes. On the other hand, DQFFC with d-axis current regulation has no issues, since the current is allowed to move within the voltage limit circle, thus a smooth and stable transition can be achieved.

Key words： Flux weakening instability maximum torque per voltage (MTPV) oscillation permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) stability voltage feedback controller

PACS:

TM301.4

Corresponding Authors: Corresponding author: Professor Zhu Z Q, born in 1962, Fellow REng, Fellow IEEE, Fellow IET, PhD, Professor at the University of Sheffield, UK. Major research interests include design, control, and applications of brushless permanent magnet machines and drives for applications ranging from automotive through domestic appliances to renewable energy. E-mail: z.q.zhu@Sheffield.ac.uk

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Wang Chao
	Zhu Ziqiang
	Xu Lei
	Wu Ximeng

Cite this article:

Wang Chao,Zhu Ziqiang,Xu Lei等. Comparative Stability Study of Two Feedback Flux-Weakening Control Methods of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 0, (): 20235415-20235415.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.221389 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y0/V/I/20235415

[1] Zhu Z Q, Howe D.Electrical machines and drives for electric, hybrid, and fuel cell Vehicles[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2007, 95(4): 746-765.
[2] Chau K T, Chan C C, Liu C.Overview of permanent-magnet brushless drives for electric and hybrid electric vehicles[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 2008, 55(6): 2246-2257.
[3] Villani M, Tursini M, Fabri G, Castellini L.High reliability permanent magnet brushless motor drive for aircraft application[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 2012, 59(5): 2073-2081.
[4] Capponi F G, Donato G D, Ferraro L D, et al.AC brushless drive with low-resolution Hall-effect sensors for surface-mounted PM Machines[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl, 2006, 42(2): 526-535.
[5] Soong W L, Miller T J E. Field-weakening performance of brushless synchronous AC motor drives[J]. IEE Proc. Electr. Power Appl, 1994, 141(6): 331-340.
[6] El-Refaie A M, Jahns T M. Optimal flux weakening in surface PM machines using fractional-slot concentrated windings[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl, 2005, 41(3): 790-800.
[7] Morimoto S, Sanada M, Takeda Y.Wide-speed operation of interior permanent magnet synchronous motors with high-performance current regulator[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl, 1994, 30(4): 920-926.
[8] Tursini M, Chiricozzi E, Petrella R.Feedforward flux-weakening control of surface-mounted permanent-magnet synchronous motors accounting for resistive voltage drop[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 2010, 57(1): 440-448.
[9] Chen Y S, Zhu Z Q, Howe D.Influence of inaccuracies in machine parameters on field-weakening performance of PM brushless AC drives[C]// Proc. IEEE 1999 Int. Conf. Electr. Mach. Drives, 1999: 691-693.
[10] Kock H W D, Rix A J, Kamper M J. Optimal torque control of synchronous machines based on finite-element analysis[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 2010, 57(1): 413-419.
[11] Maric D S, Hiti S, Stancu C C, et al.Two flux weakening schemes for surface-mounted permanent-magnet synchronous drives. Design and transient response considerations[C]// Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Ind. Electron., 1999: 673-678.
[12] Nalepa R, Orlowska-Kowalska T.Optimum trajectory control of the current vector of a nonsalient-pole PMSM in the field-weakening region[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 2012, 59(7): 2867-2876.
[13] Zhu Z Q, Chen Y S, Howe D.Online optimal flux-weakening control of permanent-magnet brushless AC drives[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl, 2000, 36(6): 1661-1668.
[14] Kim J M, Sul S K.Speed control of interior permanent magnet synchronous motor drive for the flux weakening operation[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl, 1997, 33(1): 43-48.
[15] Bianchi N, Bolognani S, Zigliotto M.High performance PM synchronous motor drive for an electric scooter[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl, 2001, 37(5): 1348-1355.
[16] Wang C, Zhu Z Q.Fuzzy logic speed control of permanent magnet synchronous machine and feedback voltage ripple reduction in flux-weakening operation region[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl, 2020, 56(2): 1505-1517.
[17] Kwon Y C, Kim S, Sul S K.Six-step operation of PMSM with instantaneous current control[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl, 2014, 50(4): 2614-2625.
[18] Bozhko S, Rashed M, Hill C. I, et al. Flux-weakening control of electric starter-generator based on permanent-magnet machine[J]. IEEE Trans. Transport. Electrific, 2917, 3(4): 864-877.
[19] Wang C, Zhu Z.Q, Zhan H. Adaptive voltage feedback controllers on nonsalient permanent magnet synchronous machine[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl, 2020, 56(2): 1529-1542.
[20] Miguel-Espinar C, Heredero-Peris D, Gross G, et al.Maximum torque per voltage flux-weakening strategy with speed limiter for PMSM drives[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 2021, 68(10): 9254-9264.
[21] Deng T, Su Z, Lin J, et al.Advanced angle field weakening control strategy of permanent magnet synchronous motor[J]. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol, 2019, 68(4): 3424-3435.
[22] Qian L, Hameyer K.A deep field weakening control for the PMSM applying a modified overmodulation strategy[C]// 8th IET Int. Conf. on Power Electronics, 2016: 1-6.
[23] Bolognani S, Calligaro S, Petrella R. Adaptive flux-weakening controller for interior permanent magnet synchronous motor drives[J]. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power Electron, 2914, 2(2): 236-248.
[24] Kwon T S, Sul S K.Novel antiwindup of a current regulator of a surface-mounted permanent-magnet motor for flux-weakening control[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl, 2006, 42(5): 1293-1300.
[25] Kwon Y, Kim S, Sul S.Voltage feedback current control scheme for improved transient performance of permanent magnet synchronous machine drives[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 2012, 59(9): 3373-3382.
[26] Liu H, Zhu Z Q, Mohamed E, Fu Y, et al.Flux-weakening control of nonsalient pole PMSM having large winding inductance, accounting for resistive voltage drop and inverter nonlinearities[J]. IEEE Trans. Power Electron, 2012, 27(2): 942-952.
[27] Lin P Y, Lai Y S.Voltage control technique for the extension of DC-Link voltage utilization of finite-speed SPMSM drives[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 2012, 59(9): 3392-3402.
[28] Zhang Y, Xu L, Güven M.K, et al. Experimental verification of deep field weakening operation of a 50-kW IPM machine by using single current regulator[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl, 2011, 47(1): 128-133.
[29] Zhu L, Wen X, Zhao F, et al.Deep fieldweakening control of PMSMs for both motion and generation operation[C]// Proc. Int. Conf. Elect. Mach. Syst, 2011: 1-5.
[30] Miyajima T, Fujimoto H, Fujitsuna M.A precise model-based design of voltage phase controller for IPMSM[J]. IEEE Trans. Power Electron, 2013, 28(12): 5655-5664.
[31] Stojan D, Drevensek D, Plantic Z, et al.Novel field-weakening control scheme for permanent-magnet synchronous machines based on voltage angle control[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl, 2012, 48(6): 2390-2401.
[32] Bon-Ho B, Patel N, Schulz S, et al.New field weakening technique for high saliency interior permanent magnet motor[C]// 38th IAS Annual Meeting on Ind. Appli. Conf, 2003: 898-905.
[33] Kwon T S, Choi G Y, Kwak M S, et al.Novel fluxweakening control of an IPMSM for quasi-six-step operation[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl, 2008, 44(6): 1722-1731.
[34] Cheng B, Tesch T R.Torque feedforward control technique for permanent-magnet synchronous motors[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 2010, 57(3): 969-974.
[35] Trancho E, Ibarra E, Arias A, et al.PM-assisted synchronous reluctance machine flux weakening control for EV and HEV applications[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 2018, 65(4): 2986-2995.
[36] Li Siyi, Su Jianyong, Yang Guijie.Flux Weakening Control Strategy of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Based on Active Disturbance Rejection Control[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(23): 6135-6144.
[37] Li Xue, Chi Song, Liu Cong, et al.Flux-weakening control with single current regulator of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on virtual resistor[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(5): 1046-1054.
[38] Guo Jiaqiang, Liu Xu, Li Shanhu.Flux weakening control of variable flux reluctance machine considering resistive voltage drops in armature and zero-sequence loop. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(18): 3911-3921.
[39] Bao Xucong, Wang Xiaolin, Gu Cong, Shi Tengrui.Stability Analysis and Improvement Design of Current Loop of Ultra-High-Speed Permanent Magnet Motor Drive System. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(10): 2469-2480.
[40] Song Xinxin, Zhao Wenxiang, Cheng Yu.Unity Power Factor Field Weakening Control of Field-Modulated Permanent Magnet Linear Modulation Motor with Open Winding. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(5): 893-901.
[41] Holtz J.Pulsewidth modulation—A survey[J]. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 1992, 39(5): 410-420.