笼型感应电机转子轴向分段错开结构削弱同步附加转矩的研究

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.221534

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1410 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The smoothness and stability requirements of motor output torque have gradually increased in recent years, especially in emerging applications such as electric vehicles. The induction machine (IM) with the merits of low price, high reliability and strong overload capacity, still has certain competitive advantages and application needs. In the classical motor design theory, the range of slot combination is restricted to ignore the large synchronous parasitic torque, for example the equivalent slot combination. However, the stray loss of IM is small when the number of stator slots and rotor slots are close to each other. For some of these special slot combinations, the output torque of the induction machine is related to the starting position of the motor. In order to suppress the torque ripple caused by the torque periodic variation with the starting position, a rotor axial piecewise staggered structure is proposed to weaken the synchronous parasitic torque. The selection range of slot combination could be expanded by solving the starting difficulty of the IM with equivalent slot combination.
The electromagnetic torque calculation model is established, the torque amplitude expression about the rotor initial position is deduced, and the magnetic field order and motor speed conditions for generating constant torque are determined. Based on the assumption of the linearly distributed magnetic potential, the mechanism of weakening the harmonic electromotive force by the piecewise staggered rotor structure is discussed. The relationship between the weakening degree of synchronous parasitic torque and the number of staggered rotor segments is quantified. Taking four kinds of special slot combination as an example, the effects of the single skewed rotor, the piecewise staggered rotor and the rotor with combined structure on the fundamental torque and synchronous parasitic torque of the motor are simulated and analyzed. Finally, the dual skewed rotor prototype machines are trial-produced with the equivalent slot combination scheme, and the motor locked-rotor torque tests are carried out.
Simulation results on the torque components show that, the single skewed rotor helps to weaken the synchronous torque of the motor with different slot combinations, and slightly reduces the fundamental torque. But the single skewed rotor still cannot change the spatial periodicity of the output torque. In the case of piecewise staggered rotor, the synchronous torque is weakened only for certain slot combinations, and the amplitude of the fundamental torque is approximately unchanged. As for the combined rotor structure, take the two-stage staggered skewed rotor as an example, the attenuation degree of harmonic magnetic field is greater than that of any single rotor structure. Experiment results on the locked-rotor torque show that, the offset effect of the staggered bar structure on the synchronous torque generated by the odd harmonics deviates from the simulation results in a degree. It is still necessary to supplement the optimal skewed rotor design to minimize the synchronous parasitic torque.
The following conclusions can be drawn from the simulation analysis and prototype test: 1) The amplitude of synchronous torque changes periodically with the starting position of the motor, and its spatial period is inversely proportional to the order of the rotor harmonic magnetic field that generates torque. The least common multiple of the period is a rotor pitch. 2) The rotor axial staggered structure can reduce the rotor harmonic electromotive force, change the spatial periodicity of the output torque of the motor with certain slot combinations, and improve the minimum output torque. (3) Compared with the skewed rotor and the piecewise staggered rotor, the combined structure of the two has a better effect of weakening the synchronous parasitic torque. When the skewed distance of the dual skewed rotor is one tooth pitch, the minimum value of the starting torque ratio of the prototype is about 1.5 times, which helps the normal starting of the motor with equal stator and rotor slot number. However, the partial magnetic flux leakage of the rotor may result in certain disadvantages such as an increase in no-load loss.

Key words： Axial piecewise staggered rotor synchronous parasitic torque torque fluctuation slot combination induction machine

PACS:

TM343

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Xu Wei
	Ren Xiaoming
	Ning Yinghang
	Bao Xiaohua

Cite this article:

Xu Wei,Ren Xiaoming,Ning Yinghang等. Research on the Reduction of Synchronous Parasitic Torque by the Rotor Axial Piecewise Staggered Structure of Cage Induction Machine[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 0, (): 70-70.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.221534 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y0/V/I/70

[1] Zhu Z Q, Chu W Q, Guan Y.Quantitative comparison of electromagnetic performance of electrical machines for HEVs/EVs[J]. CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, 2017, 1(1): 37-47.
[2] Wang Zhikun, Ching T W, Huang Shaojia, et al.Challenges faced by electric vehicle motors and their solutions[J]. IEEE Access: 2021, 9: 5228-5249.
[3] 王道涵, 彭晨, 王柄东, 等. 电动汽车新型转子内置式永磁同步电动机转矩脉动与电磁振动抑制研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报: 2022, 42(14): 5289-5300.
Wang Daohan, Peng Chen, Wang Bingdong, et al.Design and research on a novel interior permanent magnet machine with segmented rotor to mitigate torque ripple and electromagnetic vibration[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE: 2022, 42(14): 5289-5300.
[4] Thomas R, Husson H, Garbuio L, et al.Comparative study of the Tesla Model S and Audi e-Tron induction motors[C]//2021 17th Conference on Electrical Machines, Drives and Power Systems (ELMA), Sofia Bulgaria, 2021: 1-6.
[5] Mishra A K, Rajpurohit B S, Kumar R.Induction machine drive design for enhanced torque profile[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2018, 54(2): 1283-1291.
[6] 肖阳, 宋金元, 屈仁浩, 等. 变频谐波对电机振动噪声特性的影响规律[J]. 电工技术学报, 2021, 36(12): 2607-2615.
Xiao Yang, Song Jinyuan, Qu Renhao, et al.The effect of harmonics on electromagnetic vibration and noise characteristic in inverter-duty motor[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2021, 36(12): 2607-2615.
[7] Keerthipati S, Nallamekala K K.UPSC SVPWM controlled multi-level inverter topology for multiple pole-pair induction motor drive for minimising torque ripple[J]. IET Electric Power Applications, 2016, 9(6): 1306-1314.
[8] 黄林森, 赵文祥, 吉敬华, 等. 稳态性能改善的双三相永磁电机直接转矩控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(2): 355-367.
Huang Linsen, Zhao Wenxiang, Ji Jinghua, et al.Direct torque control for dual three-phase permanent-magnet machine with improved steady-state performance[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(2): 355-367.
[9] 贾慧利, 杨家强, 杨光辉. 基于转子磁链优化的五相感应电机电子变极策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(14): 3587-3597+3631.
Jia Huili, Yang Jiaqiang, Yang Guanghui. Electronic pole-changing strategy for five-phase induction motor based on rotor flux optimization[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(14): 3587-3597+3631.
[10] Li Yanxin, Zhu Ziqiang, Li Guangjin.Influence of stator topologies on average torque and torque ripple of fractional-slot SPM machines with fully closed slots[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2018, 54(3): 2151-2164.
[11] Gundogdu T, Zhu Z Q, Mipo J C.Optimization and improvement of advanced nonoverlapping induction machines for EVs/HEVs[J]. IEEE Access, 2022, 11: 13329-13353.
[12] Joksimović G, Melecio J I, Tuohy P M, et al.Towards the optimal “slot combination” for steady-state torque ripple minimization: an eight-pole cage rotor induction motor case study[J]. Electrical Engineering, 2019, 102: 293-308.
[13] Cheraghi M, Bayati Booin M, Mahmoudian Esfahani M, et al.Determination of torque-speed characteristic for a two-speed elevator induction machine[J]. IET Electric Power Applications, 2018, 12(2): 239-246.
[14] Xu Wei, Bao Xiaohua, Di Chong, et al.Optimal angle combination for improving electromagnetic torque in induction motor with double-skewed rotor[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2017, 53(11): 1-5.
[15] Boldea I, Nasar S A.The induction machines design handbook[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2010: 273-280.
[16] 安俊义, 赵海森, 刘晓芳, 等. 槽配合对单绕组双速直槽异步电动机空载磁场及损耗的影响[J]. 微特电机, 2015, 43(5): 17-21.
An Junyi, Zhao Haisen, Liu Xiaofang, et al.Influence of slot combination change on no-load magnetic field and loss of single-winding two-speed motor with straight slot system[J]. Small & Special Electrical Machines, 2015, 43(5): 17-21.
[17] Barman D, Pillay P.Effect of skewing in a variable flux interior permanent magnet synchronous machine[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2020, 56(6): 6399-6410.
[18] Ullah W, Khan F, Umair M.Design and optimization of segmented PM consequent pole hybrid excited flux switching machine for EV/HEV application[J]. China Electrotechnical Society Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, 2020, 4(3): 206-214.
[19] Hong Jianfeng, Wang Shanming, Sun Yuguang, et al.Piecewise stagger poles with continuous skew edge for vibration reduction in surface-mounted PM synchronous machines[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2021, 68(9): 8498-8506.
[20] Peng Chen, Wang Daohan, Feng Zhenkang, et al.A new segmented rotor to mitigate torque ripple and electromagnetic vibration of interior permanent magnet machine[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2022, 69(2): 1367-1377.
[21] Darjazini A, Vahedi A, Nobahari A, et al.Analysis of electromagnetic torque for induction motors with a novel non-skewed rotor structure[J]. COMPEL-The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2021, 41(1): 238-257.
[22] 刘家琦, 白金刚, 郑萍, 等. 基于磁场调制原理的齿槽转矩研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(5): 931-941.
Liu Jiaqi, Bai Jingang, Zheng Ping, et al.Investigation of cogging torque based on magnetic field modulation principle[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(5): 931-941.