AC和AC-DC两种电源对不同多级等离子体激励器的激励效果研究

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.180393

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (71737 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In this paper, AC power supply and AC-DC power supply were used to study the effect of power supply on the excitation of different multistage plasma actuators, the flow field display measurement was carried out by particle image velocimetry (PIV) technology. The results shows: when the number of electrode groups is increased, the optimum frequency of the AC power supply and the AC-DC power supply is reduced. For the same number of electrodes, the optimum frequency of the AC power supply is greater than that of the AC-DC power supply. In a certain voltage range, the excitation effect of AC power supply and AC-DC power supply on different multistage plasma actuators increases with the increase of voltage. When the number of electrode groups increases and the voltage remains same, the excitation effect of two kinds of power supply increases. When the voltage and electrode group are the same, the excitation effect of AC-DC power supply is better than AC power supply.

Key words： AC power supply AC-DC power supply plasma actuator particle image velocimetry (PIV)

Received: 21 March 2018 Published: 26 September 2018

PACS:

V211.7

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Hu Xu
	Gao Chao
	Hao Jiangnan

Cite this article:

Hu Xu,Gao Chao,Hao Jiangnan. Study on the Effect of Different Multi-DBD Plasma Actuators by AC Power Supply and AC-DC Power Supply[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2018, 33(zk1): 241-249.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.180393 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2018/V33/Izk1/241

[1] 梁华, 李应红, 宋慧敏, 等. 等离子体气动激励诱导空气流动的PIV研究[J]. 实验流体力学, 2011, 25(4): 22-25.
Liang Hua, Li Yinghong, Song Huimin, et al.PIV investigation on flow induced by plasma aerodynamic actuation[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 25(4): 22-25.
[2] 吴云, 李应红. 离子体流动控制研究进展与发展展望[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(2): 381-405.
Wu Yun, Li Yinghong.Progress and outlook of plasma flow control[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(2): 381-405.
[3] 吴阳阳, 贾敏, 王蔚龙, 等. 新型介质阻挡放电等离子体激励器的放电与诱导流动特性实验[J]. 电工技术学报, 2016, 31(24): 45-53.
Wu Yangyang, Jia Min, Wang Weilong, et al.Experimental research on the discharge and induced flow characteristics of a new dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2016, 31(24): 45-53.
[4] 周亦骁, 方志, 邵涛. Ar/O₂ 和Ar/H₂O中大气压等离子体射流放电特性的比较[J]. 电工技术学报, 2014, 29(11): 229-238.
Zhou Yixiao, Fang Zhi, Shao Tao.Comparison of discharge characteristics of atmospheric pressure plasma jet in Ar/O₂ and Ar/H₂O mixtures[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2014, 29(11): 229-238.
[5] 章程, 邵涛, 龙凯华, 等. 大气压空气中纳秒脉冲介质阻挡放电均匀性的研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2010, 25(1): 30-36.
Zhang Cheng, Shao Tao, Long Kaihua, et al.Uniform of unipolar nanosecond pulse DBD in atmospheric air[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2010, 25(1): 30-36.
[6] 戴栋, 宁文军, 邵涛. 大气压低温等离子体的研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 电工技术学报, 2017, 32(20): 1-9.
Dai Dong, Ning Wenjun, Shao Tao.A review on the state of art and future trends of atmospheric pressure low temperature plasmas[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2017, 32(20): 1-9.
[7] Roth J R.Investigation of a uniform glow discharge plasma in atmospheric air[J]. Investigation of a Uniform Glow Discharge Plasma in Atmospheric Air, 1995: 96.
[8] 高国强, 彭开晟, 董磊, 等. 电压幅值和频率对表面介质阻挡放电与气动特性的影响[J]. 电工技术学报, 2017, 32(8): 55-62.
Gao Guoqiang, Peng Kaisheng, Dong Lei, et al.Experiment of surface dielectric barrier discharge and aerodynamic characteristics at different voltage amplitude and frequency[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2017, 32(8): 55-62.
[9] Hao Jiangnan, Tian Balin, Wang Yulin, et al.Dielectric barrier plasma dynamics for active aerodynamic flow control[J]. Science China (Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy), 2014, 57(2): 345-353.
[10] Huang J, Corke T C, Thomas F O.Unsteady plasma actuators for separation control of low-pressure turbine blades[J]. Aiaa Journal, 2006, 44(44): 1477-1487.
[11] Feng L H, Jukes T N, Choi K S, et al.Flow control over a NACA 0012 airfoil using dielectric-barrier-discharge plasma actuator with a Gurney flap[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2012, 52(6): 1533-1546.
[12] Thomas F O, Corke T C, Iqbal M, et al.Optimization of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators for active aerodynamic flow control[J]. Aiaa Journal, 2012, 47(9): 2169-2178.
[13] Shang J S, Surzhikov S T, Kimmel R, et al.Mechanisms of plasma actuators for hypersonic flow control[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2005, 41(8): 642-668.
[14] Wang J J, Choi K S, Feng L H, et al.Recent developments in DBD plasma flow control[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2013, 62(4): 52-78.
[15] Benard N, Zouzou N, Claverie A, et al.Optical visualization and electrical characterization of fast-rising pulsed dielectric barrier discharge for airflow control applications[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2012, 111(3): 47.
[16] Belinger A, Hardy P, Gherardi N, et al.Influence of the spark discharge size on a plasma synthetic jet actuator[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2011, 39(11): 2334-2335.