电网山火灾中调度问题求解难度分析及困难案例预测

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.251541

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (5119 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Wildfires triggered by extreme drought have become increasingly frequent, posing severe threats to the secure and stable operation of power systems. Such events are characterized by large-scale equipment outages and complex temporal evolution of failures. Existing studies on wildfire-related power system dispatch mainly focus on the independent scheduling of grid control resources or emergency resources, while a systematic modeling framework that captures their coordinated interactions across temporal and spatial dimensions remains lacking. As a result, it is difficult to achieve a unified optimization of system security and economic efficiency during the grid restoration process. Moreover, the coordination of control and emergency resources must account for their inherent discrete characteristics; their large scale and strong coupling lead to complex structural features that distinguish wildfire emergency dispatch from conventional power system scheduling problems, thereby posing significant challenges to computational efficiency and timeliness.
However, the variation in computational difficulty of dispatch models under different failure scenarios is still not well understood. Applying identical solution strategies to scenarios with varying levels of difficulty often results in the inability to obtain high-quality restoration dispatch decisions in a timely manner for challenging cases, failing to meet the requirements for rapid restoration under diverse failure scenarios.
To address the above challenges, this paper conducts research from two perspectives. First, the coupling mechanisms among repair routing, fault repair duration, and unit scheduling behaviors are explicitly characterized. A mixed-integer linear programming model is developed that jointly incorporates repair crews (emergency resources) and unit commitment and dispatch decisions (control resources) within a unified optimization framework, systematically capturing the coordinated impacts of the two types of resources on power system security and economic efficiency. In addition, focusing on multiple categories of power system failure scenarios induced by wildfires, this study provides an in-depth analysis of how the introduction of emergency resources affects the computational difficulty of wildfire emergency dispatch models. Large-scale numerical experiments are designed and conducted by considering key factors such as the types and numbers of failed components, the temporal evolution of failures, renewable energy penetration levels, and differing emphases on security and economic objectives during dispatch. These experiments identify the critical factors that lead to significant increases in computational complexity. Second, guided by the identified factors influencing computational difficulty, data-driven methods are employed to enable accurate prediction of hard failure scenarios. After wildfire-induced outages occur, the required solution time for obtaining restoration dispatch decisions is estimated in advance, providing decision support for the rational selection of solution strategies within limited dispatch time windows.
Using public benchmark test cases, extensive multi-dimensional simulation experiments are conducted to systematically analyze the evolution patterns of computational difficulty and their key influencing factors from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives. The results demonstrate that the number, types, combinations, and temporal evolution of failed components have a significant impact on solution time. In addition, different levels of renewable energy penetration exhibit pronounced nonlinear effects on computational performance. The relative emphasis placed on system security (load shedding) and economic efficiency (start-up and generation costs) during wildfire emergency dispatch is also shown to significantly affect solution efficiency. Furthermore, challenging-case identification experiments achieve an accuracy of 0.95, validating the effectiveness of the proposed analysis. The findings reveal the key factors driving variations in the computational difficulty of wildfire emergency dispatch problems and provide a basis for selecting acceleration strategies under different failure scenarios.

Key words： Wildfire emergency and dispatching resources power grid scheduling solution difficulty analysis challenging case prediction

Received: 04 September 2025

PACS:

TM73

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Cao Yisheng
	Gao Qian
	Yu Juan
	Yang Zhifang

Cite this article:

Cao Yisheng,Gao Qian,Yu Juan等. Solution Difficulty Analysis and Challenging Case Prediction for Power Grid Wildfire Dispatch Problems[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2026, 41(19): 6614-6629.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.251541 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2026/V41/I19/6614

[1] 祝亚丽, 刘洋, 孔祥慧, 等. 中国高温、干旱及其复合事件的研究进展和展望[J]. 大气科学学报, 2025, 48(1): 26-36.
Zhu Yali, Liu Yang, Kong Xianghui, et al.Research progress and prospect on the drought, heatwave, and compound drought and heatwave events in China[J]. Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences, 2025, 48(1): 26-36.
[2] 中国新闻网. 重庆森林火灾扑救取得阶段性成果[EB/OL]. (2022-08-24)[2025-09-01]. https://www.cq.chinanews.com.cn/news/2022/0824/39-38210.html.
[3] 殷浩洋, 刘东. 山火灾害下电网安全形态的事件驱动模型与动态推演方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2024, 44(20): 7911-7924.
Yin Haoyang, Liu Dong.Event-driven model and dynamic deduction method of security morphological of power system under wildfires[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2024, 44(20): 7911-7924.
[4] Wang Lusha, Chen Bo, Ye Yanzhu, et al.Enhancing distribution system restoration with coordination of repair crew, electric vehicle, and renewable energy[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2024, 15(4): 3694-3705.
[5] 王炜歆, 王小君, 许寅, 等. 考虑输配协同的电网并行恢复分区及机组启动次序统一优化决策方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2024, 44(3): 859-871.
Wang Weixin, Wang Xiaojun, Xu Yin, et al.A synthetic optimal decision-making method for parallel restoration sectionalizing and generator start-up sequence of power grids considering transmission and distribution system coordination[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2024, 44(3): 859-871.
[6] 阚君, 许寅, 王颖, 等. 计及输电网和输气网双向耦合特性的机组恢复优化决策方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43(19): 7457-7466.
Kan Jun, Xu Yin, Wang Ying, et al.Optimal decision-making method for generator start-up considering interdependencies between power and gas transmission networks[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43(19): 7457-7466.
[7] Lei Shunbo, Chen Chen, Li Yupeng, et al.Resilient disaster recovery logistics of distribution systems: co-optimize service restoration with repair crew and mobile power source dispatch[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019, 10(6): 6187-6202.
[8] Liu Yang, Lei Shunbo, Hou Yunhe.Restoration of power distribution systems with multiple data centers as critical loads[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019, 10(5): 5294-5307.
[9] Abdelmalak M, Benidris M.Enhancing power system operational resilience against wildfires[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2022, 58(2): 1611-1621.
[10] Greenough R, Murakami K, Davidson M R, et al.Wildfire resilient unit commitment under uncertain demand[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2025, 40(4): 3131-3143.
[11] Trakas D N, Hatziargyriou N D.Optimal distribution system operation for enhancing resilience against wildfires[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2018, 33(2): 2260-2271.
[12] Chen Bo, Ye Zhigang, Chen Chen, et al.Toward a synthetic model for distribution system restoration and crew dispatch[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2019, 34(3): 2228-2239.
[13] Zhang Gang, Zhang Feng, Zhang Xin, et al.Sequential disaster recovery model for distribution systems with co-optimization of maintenance and restoration crew dispatch[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2020, 11(6): 4700-4713.
[14] Gao Qian, Yang Zhifang, Li Wenyuan, et al.Optimality-guaranteed acceleration of unit commitment calculation via few-shot solution prediction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2025, 40(2): 1583-1595.
[15] 高倩, 杨知方, 李文沅, 等. 分支定界搜索信息深度引导的电-气互联系统调度决策加速求解方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(13): 3990-4002.
Gao Qian, Yang Zhifang, Li Wenyuan, et al.Dispatch acceleration of integrated electricity and gas system using branch-and-bound search information[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(13): 3990-4002.
[16] 李鹏, 余博涵, 常乃超, 等. 基于二进制邻域动态拓展的二次凸松弛交流潮流机组组合高效求解方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2026, 46(13): 5310-5322.
Li Peng, Yu Bohan, Chang Naichao, et al.An efficient solution method for AC power flow unit commitment based on binary neighborhood dynamic expansion and quadratic convex relaxation[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2026, 46(13): 5310-5322.
[17] 高倩, 杨知方, 李文沅. 电力系统混合整数线性规划问题的运筹决策关键技术综述与展望[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(11): 3291-3307.
Gao Qian, Yang Zhifang, Li Wenyuan.Prospect on operations research for mixed-integer linear programming problems in power systems[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(11): 3291-3307.
[18] 肖娟霞, 李勇, 韩宇, 等. 计及台风时空特性和灵活性资源协同优化的配电网弹性提升策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(23): 7430-7446.
Xiao Juanxia, Li Yong, Han Yu, et al.Resilience enhancement strategy for distribution networks considering the spatiotemporal characteristics of typhoon and the collaborative optimization of flexible resources[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(23): 7430-7446.
[19] 孔惠文, 马静, 程鹏, 等. 基于直流线路互联的区-隧供电系统弹性恢复策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(7): 2089-2103.
Kong Huiwen, Ma Jing, Cheng Peng, et al.Resilience recovery strategy for district-tunnel power supply system based on DC line interconnection[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(7): 2089-2103.
[20] Gurobi. Gurobi optimizer reference manual[EB/OL].
[2025-09-28]. https://www.gurobi.com/documentation/9.1/refman/lazy.html.