面向协同攻击的电力信息物理系统防御资源分配方法

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.252035

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1867 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Cyber-physical power systems (CPPSs) are increasingly exposed to coordinated cyber-physical attacks because power system operation depends heavily on information communication and control functions. Existing defense studies usually focus on physical attacks against transmission lines or cyber attacks against information nodes separately. However, the coupling relationships between the power network and the information network may cause cross-layer failure propagation and amplify attack consequences. In addition, the attacker’s available resources are difficult to determine accurately before attacks, so defense strategies based on fixed attack resources may underestimate system risk. To address these issues, a defense resource allocation method for CPPSs under uncertain coordinated attacks is proposed.
Firstly, a CPPS model considering multiple coupling characteristics is established. Structural coupling is used to describe the correspondence between transmission lines and communication links. Energy-supply coupling is introduced to characterize the influence of power node load shedding on the operating state of information nodes. Control coupling is further established to describe the degradation of power node regulation capability caused by information load loss. Based on these coupling relationships, the operating response of CPPSs under physical attacks and distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks is modeled. Secondly, considering the uncertainty of attack resources, a tri-level coordinated defense-attack-defense (CDAD) optimization model is constructed. The upper level determines the defense strategy, including transmission line hardening and information node protection. The middle level searches for the worst coordinated attack strategy under different attack-resource scenarios. The lower level minimizes the post-attack operating cost under power network constraints, information network constraints, and coupling constraints. Finally, an improved nested column-and-constraint generation (NC&CG) algorithm is proposed. A coarse-solution and fine-solution strategy is adopted to reduce unnecessary high-precision solution of inner subproblems in early iterations, while strict convergence accuracy is restored in the final stage.
Case studies were conducted on the IEEE RTS-79 system and the IEEE 118-bus system. The results show that coordinated cyber-physical attacks caused larger system losses than physical attacks alone. In the IEEE RTS-79 system, when the physical attack resource was 8 and the DDoS attack resource was 2, the load shedding reached 2 580 MW, compared with 1 402 MW under physical attacks alone. The coordinated allocation of physical and cyber defense resources reduced post-attack load shedding; for example, when the physical defense resource was 5, increasing the cyber defense resource from 0 to 3 reduced the load shedding from 725 MW to 508 MW. Sensitivity analysis shows that the system was more sensitive to the control coupling coefficient than to the energy-supply coupling coefficient. In the IEEE 118-bus test scenario, the improved NC&CG algorithm obtained the same objective value as the conventional NC&CG algorithm, while reducing the computation time from 15 184 s to 10 326 s.
The following conclusions can be drawn from the study. (1) The proposed CPPS coupling model can describe the effects of structural coupling, energy-supply coupling, and control coupling on coordinated attack propagation. Ignoring these coupling relationships may lead to underestimation of system vulnerability. (2) The CDAD optimization model can coordinate transmission line hardening and information node protection under uncertain coordinated attacks, thereby reducing post-attack load shedding. (3) The improved NC&CG algorithm improves computational efficiency through the coarse-solution and fine-solution strategy while maintaining final solution accuracy.

Key words： Cyber-physical power systems multiple coupling characteristics uncertain coordinated attack defense resource optimization improved nested column-and-constraint generation algorithm

Received: 28 November 2025

PACS:

TM73

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zhao Yulong
	Liu Chunming
	Wang Ying

Cite this article:

Zhao Yulong,Liu Chunming,Wang Ying. Defense Resource Allocation Method for Cyber-Physical Power Systems Against Coordinated Attacks[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2026, 41(13): 4339-4358.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.252035 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2026/V41/I13/4339

[1] 潘超, 李梓铭, 龚榆淋, 等. 计及电力-通信-交通耦合网络不确定性的虚拟电厂鲁棒优化调度[J]. 电工技术学报, 2025, 40(15): 4755-4769.
Pan Chao, Li Ziming, Gong Yulin, et al.Robust optimization scheduling of virtual power plant considering the uncertainty of power-communication-transportation coupling network[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2025, 40(15): 4755-4769.
[2] Zografopoulos I, Srivastava A, Konstantinou C, et al.Cyber-physical interdependence for power system operation and control[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2025, 16(3): 2554-2573.
[3] 陈亚鹏, 杨阳, 舒乙凌, 等. 基于业务性能偏差感知的电力通信网路由优化策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(11): 3411-3421.
Chen Yapeng, Yang Yang, Shu Yiling, et al.Service performance deviation awareness-based power communication network routing optimization strategy[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(11): 3411-3421.
[4] Jing Xiang, Qin Wenping, Yao Hongmin, et al.Resilience-oriented planning strategy for the cyber-physical ADN under malicious attacks[J]. Applied Energy, 2024, 353: 122052.
[5] 崔沛然, 崔明建, 汪清, 等. 基于张量分解个性化联邦学习的网络-光伏爬坡协同攻击辨识[J]. 电工技术学报, 2025, 40(23): 7677-7693.
Cui Peiran, Cui Mingjian, Wang Qing, et al.Cyber-ramping coordinated attack identification method for PV using a tensor decomposition based personalized federated learning[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2025, 40(23): 7677-7693.
[6] 梁皓澜, 刘东奇, 曾祥君, 等. 电力高级量测体系网络攻击致损路径图构建及风险评估[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2024, 48(12): 89-99.
Liang Haolan, Liu Dongqi, Zeng Xiangjun, et al.Construction of damage path diagram and risk assessment of cyber-attack on power advanced metering infrastructure[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2024, 48(12): 89-99.
[7] 赵宇龙, 刘春明, 付晴玉, 等. 考虑多重耦合关系的电力信息物理系统协同攻击研究[J]. 电网技术, 2025, 49(8): 3145-3155.
Zhao Yulong, Liu Chunming, Fu Qingyu, et al.Research on collaborative attacks on cyber-physical power system considering multiple coupling relationships[J]. Power System Technology, 2025, 49(8): 3145-3155.
[8] Xiang Yingmeng, Wang Lingfeng, Liu Nian.Coordinated attacks on electric power systems in a cyber-physical environment[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2017, 149: 156-168.
[9] Liang Gaoqi, Weller S R, Zhao Junhua, et al.The 2015 Ukraine blackout: implications for false data injection attacks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2017, 32(4): 3317-3318.
[10] He Huihui, Huang Shengjun, Liu Yajie, et al.A tri-level optimization model for power grid defense with the consideration of post-allocated DGs against coordinated cyber-physical attacks[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2021, 130: 106903.
[11] 强仁, 龚钢军, 王大为, 等. 基于变电站信息物理耦合特征的扰动建模、韧性评估和提升策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2026, 46(9): 3606-3628.
Qiang Ren, Gong Gangjun, Wang Dawei, et al.Substation disturbance modeling, resilience evaluation method and enhancement strategy based on the characteristics of cyber physical coupling[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2026, 46(9): 3606-3628.
[12] Wu Xuan, Conejo A J.An efficient tri-level optimization model for electric grid defense planning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2017, 32(4): 2984-2994.
[13] Qin Chao, Zhong Chongyu, Sun Bing, et al.A tri-level optimal defense method against coordinated cyber-physical attacks considering full substation topology[J]. Applied Energy, 2023, 339: 120961.
[14] Liu Xuecheng, Wang Haoxin, Shi Libao.A three-stage dynamic game strategy incorporating wind generation uncertainty against FDI attack of wind farm reactive power compensation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2025, 40(2): 1504-1517.
[15] Lai Kexing, Illindala M, Subramaniam K.A tri-level optimization model to mitigate coordinated attacks on electric power systems in a cyber-physical environment[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 235: 204-218.
[16] Xiang Yingmeng, Wang Lingfeng.An improved defender-attacker-defender model for transmission line defense considering offensive resource uncertainties[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019, 10(3): 2534-2546.
[17] Zhao Yirui, Gan Wei, Yan Mingyu, et al.A scalable stochastic scheme for identifying critical substations considering the epistemic uncertainty of contingency in power systems[J]. Applied Energy, 2025, 381: 125119.
[18] Kong Xiangxing, Lu Zhigang, Li Yanlin, et al.Resilience-oriented defense strategy for power systems against uncertain malicious coordinated attacks[J]. Applied Energy, 2025, 378: 124785.
[19] 杨挺, 许哲铭, 赵英杰, 等. 数字化新型电力系统攻击与防御方法研究综述[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2024, 48(6): 112-126.
Yang Ting, Xu Zheming, Zhao Yingjie, et al.Review on research of attack and defense methods for digitalized new power system[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2024, 48(6): 112-126.
[20] Buldyrev S V, Parshani R, Paul G, et al.Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks[J]. Nature, 2010, 464(7291): 1025-1028.
[21] Ti Baozhong, Li Gengyin, Zhou Ming, et al.Resilience assessment and improvement for cyber-physical power systems under typhoon disasters[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2022, 13(1): 783-794.
[22] Zhang Yiwei, Liu Wenxia, Shi Qingxin, et al.Resilience assessment of multi-decision complex energy interconnection system[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2022, 137: 107809.
[23] Li Xin, Xu Qimin, Lu Xuanzhao, et al.Distributionally robust coordinated defense strategy for time-sensitive networking enabled cyber-physical power system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2024, 15(3): 3278-3287.
[24] 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 电网运行准则: GB/T 31464—2022[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2022.
[25] 张艺伟, 刘文霞, 刘耕铭, 等. 考虑拓扑相关和双重耦合的电力信息物理系统建模与脆弱性分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(16): 5486-5499.
Zhang Yiwei, Liu Wenxia, Liu Gengming, et al.Modeling and vulnerability analysis of electric cyber physical system considering topological correlation and double coupling[J]. Proceedings of the Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering, 2021, 41(16): 5486-5499.
[26] Gharebaghi S, Chaudhuri N R, He Ting, et al.Dynamic modeling and mitigation of cascading failures in power grids with interdependent cyber and physical layers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2024, 15(3): 3235-3247.
[27] Huang Gang, Wang Jianhui, Chen Chen, et al.Cyber-constrained optimal power flow model for smart grid resilience enhancement[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019, 10(5): 5547-5555.
[28] 朱晓荣, 司羽. 考虑物理-信息-交通网耦合的配电网多时段动态供电恢复策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(12): 3306-3320.
Zhu Xiaorong, Si Yu.Multi-period dynamic power supply restoration strategy considering physical-cyber-traffic network coupling[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(12): 3306-3320.
[29] Rosato V, Issacharoff L, Tiriticco F, et al.Modelling interdependent infrastructures using interacting dynamical models[J]. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 2008, 4(1/2): 63-79.
[30] 刘佳昕, 秦文萍, 邢亚虹, 等. 极端灾害下有功-无功协同优化的两阶段配电网韧性提升策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2026, 41(9): 3070-3084.
Liu Jiaxin, Qin Wenping, Xing Yahong, et al.Two-stage strategy for enhancing the resilience of distribution networks through active and reactive power coordinated optimization under extreme disasters[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2026, 41(9): 3070-3084.
[31] Nozarian M, Fereidunian A, Barati M.A system of systems approach to reliability-oriented planning of people-centric smart city energy infrastructure: a bilevel MILP formulation[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2024, 18(4): 2085-2096.
[32] Zhao L, Zeng B.An exact algorithm for two-stage robust optimization with mixed integer recourse problems[R]. Optimization Online, 2012.
[33] 牛涛, 黄骞谦, 方斯顿, 等. 基于多光谱卫星遥感的输电网冰灾场景时序建模与韧性提升策略优化[J]. 电工技术学报, 2025, 40(13): 4200-4215, 4305.
Niu Tao, Huang Qianqian, Fang Sidun, et al.Temporal modeling of ice disaster scenarios and optimization of resilience enhancement strategies in power transmission network based on multispectral satellite remote sensing data[J]. Transactions of China Electro-technical Society, 2025, 40(13): 4200-4215, 4305.
[34] Tsang M Y, Shehadeh K S, Curtis F E.An inexact column-and-constraint generation method to solve two-stage robust optimization problems[J]. Operations Research Letters, 2023, 51(1): 92-98.
[35] Grigg C, Wong P, Albrecht P, et al.The IEEE Reliability Test System-1996. A report prepared by the reliability test system task force of the application of probability methods subcommittee[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(3): 1010-1020.
[36] 遆宝中, 李庚银, 王剑晓, 等. 计及监测与控制功能的电力信息物理系统关键输电线路辨识方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(7): 2556-2565.
Ti Baozhong, Li Gengyin, Wang Jianxiao, et al.Identification of critical transmission lines in cyber-physical power system considering monitoring function and control function[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42(7): 2556-2565.
[37] Motto A L, Arroyo J M, Galiana F D.A mixed-integer LP procedure for the analysis of electric grid security under disruptive threat[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2005, 20(3): 1357-1365.