面向梯级水电改造的抽水耦合压缩空气储能系统技术经济性分析

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.250814

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1291 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract

The increasing penetration of intermittent renewable energy sources requires significant enhancements in the regulation capabilities of modern power systems. While retrofitting cascade hydropower into hybrid pumped-hydro energy storage (HPES) offers a solution, traditional reversible-pump turbine (RT) methods are hindered by low storage density and flood-season curtailment. To address these challenges, this study proposes a novel retrofit scheme based on pumped-hydro compressed air energy storage (PH-CAES) and systematically evaluates its techno-economic feasibility under variable operating conditions.
The proposed PH-CAES system repurposes idle construction tunnels as air-water storage vessels (ASV), significantly reducing civil engineering costs compared to newly excavated caverns. Unlike conventional constant-volume CAES, the ASV utilizes a hydraulic connection to the upper reservoir, allowing water inflow and outflow to compensate for air volume changes. This mechanism maintains a quasi-isobaric environment for the compressed air, thereby optimizing the efficiency of turbomachinery. To rigorously assess this system, a dynamic operation model was established to quantify the off-design performance of compressors and expanders, complemented by a finite volume method to verify the heat transfer performance of the packed-bed thermal storage. Building upon these physical models, a comprehensive techno-economic analysis model was developed to calculate the dynamic payback period (DPP) and levelized cost of storage (LCOS).
Simulation results indicate that under rated design conditions, the PH-CAES system achieves a round-trip efficiency of 71.60%, a DPP of 8.06 years, and an LCOS of 0.2108 CNY/kWh. However, practical operation is inevitably influenced by hydrological variability. Accounting for hydrological variability across wet, normal, and dry years, the resulting off-design operation increases the expected DPP to 8.65 years and the LCOS to 0.2254 CNY/kWh. Sensitivity analysis reveals that the number of annual cycles and the electricity purchase price are the most critical economic drivers, with sensitivities exceeding 10⁸ CNY, whereas the impact of water head variation is mitigated by the limited fluctuation range typical of cascade stations.
A comparative analysis against alternative retrofit technical routes highlights the advantages of the proposed scheme. While independent AA-CAES generates the highest revenue, its high investment results in a prolonged DPP of 10.70 years. Conversely, retrofitting with RT offers the lowest investment cost but suffers from the lowest revenue and a DPP of 9.72 years, primarily due to the inability to store energy when the upper reservoir is spilling water during flood seasons. The proposed PH-CAES scheme achieves the optimal balance between investment and revenue, delivering the best comprehensive economic performance. Furthermore, by facilitating the reuse of water resources, the system reduces the water consumption rate of the cascade station to 2.2166 m³/kWh, outperforming both the original station and the independent CAES scheme. These findings demonstrate that the PH-CAES retrofit provides a robust and economically superior pathway for upgrading cascade hydropower stations, particularly at sites with high hydraulic heads and stable geological conditions.

Key words： Pumped-hydro compressed air energy storage cascade hydropower stations retrofitting off-design performance techno-economy performance analysis

Received: 15 May 2025

PACS:	TM91
	F403.7

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Deng Hanyu
	Chen Yanbo
	Zhang Ning
	Ma Mingke
	Zhang Zhi

Cite this article:

Deng Hanyu,Chen Yanbo,Zhang Ning等. Techno-Economic Analysis of Pumped-Hydro Compressed Air Energy Storage System for retrofit of Cascade Hydropower Stations[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 0, (): 2-.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.250814 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y0/V/I/2

[1] 陈艳波, 田昊欣, 刘宇翔, 等. 计及电动汽车需求响应的高速公路服务区光储充鲁棒优化配置[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45(5): 1752-1766.
Chen Yanbo, Tian Haoxin, Liu Yuxiang, et al.Robust optimization configuration of photovoltaic-storage-charging integrated system in expressway service area considering demand response of electric vehicles[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025,45(5):1752-1766.
[2] 师瑞峰, 蔺泳琪, 张凌志, 等. 压缩储能与氢能驱动的虚拟电厂源-储-荷低碳经济调度[J/OL]. 电工技术学报. (2025-07-25)[2025-12-24]. https://doi.org/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.250803.
Shi Ruifeng, Lin Yongqi, Zhang Lingzhi, et al. Compressed storage and hydrogen-driven virtual power plant: low carbon economic dispatch of generation-storage-load[J/OL]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society. (2025-07-25)[2025-12-24]. https://doi.org/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.250803.
[3] 郭怿, 明波, 黄强, 等. 考虑输电功率平稳性的水-风-光-储多能互补日前鲁棒优化调度[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(9): 2350-2363.
Guo Yi, Ming Bo, Huang Qiang, et al.Day-ahead robust optimal scheduling of hydro-wind-PV-storage complementary system considering the steadiness of power delivery[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(9): 2350-2363.
[4] 侯心宇, 苗世洪, 王廷涛, 等. 大容量先进绝热压缩空气储能系统动态建模及特性分析[J/OL]. 电工技术学报. (2025-09-24)[2025-12-24]. https://doi.org/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.242058.
Hou Xinyu, Miao Shihong, Wang Tingtao, et al. Dynamic modelling and characterization of large capacity advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage system[J/OL]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society. (2025-09-24)[2025-12-24]. https://doi.org/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.242058.
[5] 国家发展改革委, 国家能源局. 关于印发《电力系统调节能力优化专项行动实施方案(2025—2027年)》的通知[EB/OL]. (2024-12-20)[2025-12-24]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202501/content_6996643.htm.
[6] 高帆, 包道日娜, 赵明智, 等. 多场景规划下混合储能对风光耦合出力波动的平抑特性[J]. 电工技术学报, 2025, 40(9): 2827-2839.
Gao Fan, Bao Daorina, Zhao Mingzhi, et al.Smoothing method of wind-solar coupled output fluctuations by hybrid energy storage under multi-scenario planning[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2025, 40(9): 2827-2839.
[7] 冯艺萱, 边晓燕, 陈雯, 等. 新型电力系统灵活性资源成本回收机制分析及挑战[J]. 电工技术学报, 2025, 40(21): 7013-7028.
Feng Yixuan, Bian Xiaoyan, Chen Wen, et al.Analysis and challenges of new power system flexibility resource cost recovery mechanisms[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2025, 40(21): 7013-7028.
[8] 张智, 霍超, 郭尊, 等. 新型电力系统下抽水蓄能集群规划与运营关键问题综述及研究展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45(15): 5810-5832.
Zhang Zhi, Huo Chao, Guo Zun, et al.Overview and research prospects of key issues in pumped storage cluster planning and operation under the new type power systems[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45(15): 5810-5832.
[9] 刘欣雨, 罗彬, 陈永灿, 等. 融合改造的梯级混合式抽蓄短期调峰优化模型[J]. 电网技术, 2025, 49(3): 1217-1226.
Liu Xinyu, Luo Bin, Chen Yongcan, et al.Short-term peak shaving model of cascade hybrid pumped storage retrofitted from conventional hydropower[J]. Power System Technology, 2025, 49(3): 1217-1226.
[10] Tan Qiaofeng, Nie Zhuang, Wen Xin, et al.Complementary scheduling rules for hybrid pumped storage hydropower-photovoltaic power system reconstructing from conventional cascade hydropower stations[J]. Applied Energy, 2024, 355: 122250.
[11] 冯晨, 常高松, 陶湘明, 等. 含混合式抽水蓄能电站的水光蓄日内互补运行研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2024, 42(8): 173-177.
Feng Chen, Chang Gaosong, Tao Xiangming, et al.Short-term complementary operation of hydro photovoltaic mixed pumped storage integrated power system[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2024, 42(8): 173-177.
[12] Zhang Juntao, Cheng Chuntian, Yu Shen, et al.Preliminary feasibility analysis for remaking the function of cascade hydropower stations to enhance hydropower flexibility: a case study in China[J]. Energy, 2022, 260: 125163.
[13] Tică E I, Popa B, Popa R.Annual performance estimation of a multireservoir system including a pumped storage plant for the mean hydrological year[J]. Journal of Energy Engineering, 2017, 143(6): 04017058.
[14] Ak M, Kentel E, Savasaneril S.Quantifying the revenue gain of operating a cascade hydropower plant system as a pumped-storage hydropower system[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 139: 739-752.
[15] 郑开云, 池捷成, 张学锋. 耦合抽水蓄能的压缩空气储能电站概念研究[J]. 南方能源建设, 2023, 10(2): 18-25.
Zheng Kaiyu, Chi Jiecheng, Zhang Xuefeng.Concept research of compressed air energy storage power plant coupled with pumped hydro storage[J]. Southern Energy Construction, 2023, 10(2): 18-25.
[16] Zhang Zhi, Chen Yanbo, Ma Tianyang, et al.Multi-type energy storage expansion planning: a review for high-penetration renewable energy integration[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2025, 219: 115853.
[17] 丁紫玉, 方国华, 毛莺池, 等. 考虑发电与弃水风险的梯级水电站水库风险调度模型[J]. 水资源保护, 2024, 40(2): 100-106+149.
Ding Ziyu, Fang Guohua, Mao Yingchi, et al.Risk dispatching model of cascade hydropower station reservoirs considering power generation and water
18 abandonment risks[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2024, 40(2): 100-106+149.
[18] 姚尔人, 席光, 王焕然, 等. 一种新型压缩空气与抽水复合储能系统的热力学分析[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2018, 52(3): 12-18.
Yao Erren, Xi Guang, Wang Huanran, et al.Thermodynamic analysis on a novel compressed-air based pumped hydro energy storage system[J]. Journal of Xi’An Jiaotong University, 2018, 52(3): 12-18.
[19] Kim Y M, Shin D G, Favrat D.Operating characteristics of constant-pressure compressed air energy storage (CAES) system combined with pumped hydro storage based on energy and exergy analysis[J]. Energy, 2011, 36(10): 6220-6233.
[20] Wang Huanran, Wang Liqin, Wang Xinbing, et al.A novel pumped hydro combined with compressed air energy storage system[J]. Energies, 2013, 6(3): 1554-1567.
[21] Lakshmiprabha K E, Kumar U A, Pathak P, et al.Efficiency and economic assessment of wind turbine-powered pumped hydro-compressed air storage coupled with alkaline fuel cell using hybrid approach[J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2024, 26(12): 4255-4272.
[22] Ge Gangqiang, Wang Huanran, Li Ruixiong, et al.A reliable operation strategy on the compressed-air-regulates-pressure underground pumped storage system and its thermo-economic investigation[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 74: 109295.
[23] Chen Hao, Wang Huanran, Li Ruixiong, et al.Experimental and analytical investigation of near-isothermal pumped hydro-compressed air energy storage system[J]. Energy, 2022, 249: 123607.
[24] Yao Eeren, Zhong Like, Zhang Yuan, et al.Comprehensive performance exploration of a novel pumped-hydro based compressed air energy storage system with high energy storage density[J]. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2022, 14(6): 064102.
[25] Cao Ruifeng, Li Weiqiang, Wang Sicheng, et al.Comprehensive comparative study of two novel isobaric adiabatic compressed air energy storage systems coupled with pumped hydro storage[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2024, 257: 124318.
[26] Mozayeni H, Wang X, Negnevitsky M, et al.Study of effect of heat transfer in an air storage vessel on performance of a pumped hydro compressed air energy storage system[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 148: 119119.
[27] Camargos T P L, Pottie D L F, Ferreira R A M, et al. Experimental study of a PH-CAES system: proof of concept[J]. Energy, 2018, 165: 630-638.
[28] Lakshmiprabha K E, Kumar U A, Pathak P, et al.Efficiency and economic assessment of wind turbine-powered pumped hydro-compressed air storage coupled with alkaline fuel cell using hybrid approach[J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2024, 26(12): 4255-4272.
[29] 严凯, 侯付彬, 刘明明, 等. 恒压型抽水压缩空气储能系统的热力学及经济学多目标优化[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2020, 41(1): 135-140.
Yan Kai, Hou Fubin, Liu Mingming, et al.Multi-objective optimization on thermodynamics and economics of a constant-pressure pumped hydro combined with compressed air energy storage system[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2020, 41(1): 135-140.
[30] Chen Hao, Wang Huanran, Li Ruixiong, et al.Thermo-dynamic and economic analysis of a novel pumped hydro-compressed air energy storage system combined with compressed air energy storage system as a spray system[J]. Energy, 2023, 280: 128134.
[31] 蒋志容, 侯彦硕, 丁平, 等. 水电洞室压缩空气储能地下储气库可行性分析[J]. 四川水力发电, 2023, 42(S1): 22-28, 35.
Jiang Zhirong, Hou Yanshuo, Ding Ping, et al.Feasibility analysis of under ground gas storage for compressed air energy storage in hydropower caverns[J]. Sichuan Hydropower, 2023, 42(S1): 22-28, 35.
[32] 郭欢, 徐玉杰, 张新敬, 等. 蓄热式压缩空气储能系统变工况特性[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2019, 39(5): 1366-1377.
Guo Huan, Xu Yujie, Zhang Xinjing, et al.Off-design performance of compressed air energy storage system with thermal storage[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(5): 1366-1377.
[33] Zhang Na, Cai Ruixian.Analytical solutions and typical characteristics of part-load performances of single shaft gas turbine and its cogeneration[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2002.
[34] Yan Mengdi, Liu Changchun, Ling Haoshu, et al.Off-design performance of variable-speed compressed air energy storage system under different operation schemes[J]. Energy, 2025, 338: 138626.
[35] Barbour E, Mignard D, Ding Yulong, et al.Adiabatic compressed air energy storage with packed bed thermal energy storage[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 155: 804-815.
[36] Yang Kun, Chen Hao, Liu Wei.Determination of the stress jump coefficient, the interstitial heat transfer coefficient and the interface heat transfer coefficient in a porous composite system[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 115: 657-662.
[37] Liu Shaolin, Ahmadi-Senichault A, Pozzobon V, et al.Multi-scale investigation of heat and momentum transfer in packed-bed TES systems up to 800 K[J]. Applied Energy, 2024, 366: 123285.
[38] Nemec D, Levec J.Flow through packed bed reactors: 1. single-phase flow[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60(24): 6947-6957.
[39] Samira S.A model of transient heat transfer in a packed bed of alumina particles[D]. New York: CUNY City College, 2013.
[40] Pottie D L F, Ferreira R A M, Maia T A C, et al. An alternative sequence of operation for pumped-hydro compressed air energy storage (PH-CAES) systems[J]. Energy, 2020, 191: 116472.
[41] Razmi A, Soltani M, Aghanajafi C, et al.Thermodynamic and economic investigation of a novel integration of the absorption-recompression refrigeration system with compressed air energy storage (CAES)[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 187: 262-273.
[42] 张玮灵, 古含, 章超, 等. 压缩空气储能技术经济特点及发展趋势[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(4): 1295-1301.
Zhang Weiling, Gu Han, Zhang Chao, et al.Technical economic characteristics and development trends of compressed air energy storage[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(4): 1295-1301.
[43] Hunter C A, Penev M M, Reznicek E P, et al.Techno-economic analysis of long-duration energy storage and flexible power generation technologies to support high-variable renewable energy grids[J]. Joule, 2021, 5(8): 2077-2101.
[44] 国家能源局华中监管局, 国家能源局四川监管办公室. 关于印发《川渝一体化电力调峰辅助服务市场运营规则》的通知[EB/OL]. (2024-08-16)[2025-12-24]. https://hzj.nea.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfg/202410/t20241012_270662.html.
[45] 国家发展改革委. 关于进一步完善抽水蓄能价格形成机制的意见[EB/OL]. (2021-05-07)[2025-12-24]. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/202105/t20210507_1279341.html.
[46] 赵晋泉, 唐成魁, 陈涛, 等. 基于顺序出清的惯量和一次调频辅助服务市场机制[J/OL]. 电力系统自动化, (2025-11-05)[2025-12-24]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/32.1180.TP.20251105.1405.002.
Zhao Jinquan, Tang Chengkui, Chen Tao, et al. Sequential clearing based ancillary service market mechanism of inertia and primary frequency regulation[J/OL]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, (2025-11-05)[2025-12-24]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/32.1180.TP.20251105.1405.002.
[47] 生态环境部. 可再生能源并网发电方法学[EB/OL]. (2016-03-03)[2025-12-24]. https://cdm.ccchina.org.cn/archiver/cdmcn/UpFile/Files/Default/20160303093516686376.pdf.
[48] 全国温室气体自愿减排交易系统[EB/OL]. (2025-03-22][2025-12-24]. https://www.ccer.com.cn/wcm/ccer/html/2502sjcx/index.html.
[49] 水电水利规划设计总院. 中国可再生能源工程造价管理报告2024年度[R]. 北京: 水电水利规划设计总院, 2025.https://www.eesia.cn/upload/files/2025/5/2fea84d6414c788d.pdf.
[50] 杨宇轩, 周明, 郭尊, 等. 双馈式变速抽蓄机组对新型电力系统多维支撑能力量化方法[J]. 电网技术, 2025, 49(8): 3116-3127.
Yang Yuxuan, Zhou Ming, Guo Zun, et al.Quantifying multi-dimensional support capabilities of variable-speed pumped storage for new-type power system. Power System Technology[J]. 2025, 49(8): 3116-3127.