脉冲激励磁性纳米粒子的磁化稳态方法

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.242285

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2964 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract As an emerging medical imaging technology, magnetic particle imaging (MPI) possesses numerous unique advantages and holds broad application prospects in multiple fields. However, currently, MPI is confronted with a critical problem: its image resolution fails to meet the clinical demands for in-vivo medical human imaging. In theory, increasing the particle size of magnetic nanoparticles can enhance the MPI resolution. Nevertheless, in practical measurements, a larger particle size intensifies the relaxation effect. Due to this relaxation effect, magnetic particles cannot reach the magnetization steady-state under the constantly changing sinusoidal excitation, exerting a non-negligible negative impact on imaging. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the MPI system to enable the magnetization of magnetic particles to reach a steady state and eliminate the influence of the relaxation effect. In view of this, a pulsed magnetic field excitation method is put forward in this paper.
Firstly, to accurately describe the magnetization change process of magnetic particles, the Langevin magnetization theory was combined with the Debye relaxation theory to construct a theoretical magnetization model of magnetic particles. Simultaneously, an open-structure MPI system simulation model is established, which encompasses key components like excitation coils, detection coils, compensation coils, gradient coils, and focus coils. The gradient coil adopts an improved rectangular gradient coil to enhance the accuracy and uniformity of the field free line (FFL).
Secondly, a pulsed excitation method is proposed. The area under the decaying voltage curve is chosen as the imaging parameter for pulsed-excitation MPI. By passing current through the excitation coil in the simulation model, a pulsed magnetic field was generated. This pulsed magnetic field contains quick changing and constant components, capable of exciting magnetic particles to generate signals while enabling magnetic particles to reach the magnetization steady-state.
Subsequently, simulation experiments were carried out using the established simulation model.Under the same conditions of excitation frequency, amplitude, and particle size, the magnetization signals of magnetic particles under pulsed and sinusoidal excitations are compared. The results indicate that pulsed excitation can make the magnetization of magnetic particles reach a steady-state. Meanwhile, the signal point-spread functions under different excitations were also measured. The resolution was evaluated by the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the signal point-spread function. The experimental results show that the FWHM of the signal point-spread function of pulsed-excitation MPI is 84% of that of sinusoidal-excitation MPI, indicating an improvement in resolution.
Finally, A line-source imaging experiment is carried out using the x-space method to further visually demonstrate the differences in the imaging resolution of MPI under different excitations.The single-line-source imaging results demonstrate that pulsed-excitation MPI has fewer imaging artifacts and no imaging offset occurs. The The double-line-source imaging demonstrates that the pulsed excitation MPI has a stronger resolving ability for two adjacent line sources with an interval of 1 mm.
The results of the simulation experiments and imaging experiments indicate that modifying the sinusoidal excitation magnetic field of traditional MPI to pulsed excitation can enable the magnetization of magnetic particles to reach a steady state, thereby eliminating signal lag and improving the resolution of MPI.

Key words： Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) x-space MPI magnetization steady state relaxation effect

Received: 18 December 2024

PACS:

TM153

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Li Meining
	Du Qiang
	Ke Li

Cite this article:

Li Meining,Du Qiang,Ke Li. The Method of Magnetization Steady State of Magnetic Nanoparticles by Pulsed Excitation[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2026, 41(1): 37-45.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.242285 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2026/V41/I1/37

[1] Gleich B, Weizenecker J.Tomographic imaging using the nonlinear response of magnetic particles[J]. Nature, 2005, 435(7046): 1214-1217.
[2] 祖婉妮, 柯丽, 杜强, 等. 开放式磁性纳米粒子断层成像线型旋转零磁场设计[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(19): 4161-4170.
Zu Wanni, Ke Li, Du Qiang, et al.Electronically rotated field-free line generation for open bore magnetic particle tomography imaging[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(19): 4161-4170.
[3] Tong Wei, Hui Hui, Shang Wenting, et al.Highly sensitive magnetic particle imaging of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque with active myeloperoxidase- targeted nanoparticles[J]. Theranostics, 2021, 11(2): 506-521.
[4] Wang Qiyue, Ma Xibo, Liao Hongwei, et al.Artificially engineered cubic iron oxide nanoparticle as a high-performance magnetic particle imaging tracer for stem cell tracking[J]. ACS Nano, 2020, 14(2): 2053-2062.
[5] Sehl O C, Foster P J.The sensitivity of magnetic particle imaging and fluorine-19 magnetic resonance imaging for cell tracking[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 22198.
[6] Rivera-Rodriguez A, Hoang-Minh L B, Chiu-Lam A, et al. Tracking adoptive T cell immunotherapy using magnetic particle imaging[J]. Nanotheranostics, 2021, 5(4): 431-444.
[7] Pagan J, McDonough C, Vo T, et al. Single-sided magnetic particle imaging device with field-free-line geometry for in vivo imaging applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2021, 57(2): 1-5.
[8] 刘洋洋, 杜强, 柯丽, 等. 磁性粒子成像线型零磁场设计及性能分析[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(10): 2088-2097.
Liu Yangyang, Du Qiang, Ke Li, et al.Design and analysis of magnetic field-free line in magnetic particle imaging[J]. Transactions of China Electro- technical Society, 2020, 35(10): 2088-2097.
[9] 张玺, 郑建勇, 梅飞, 等. 基于Lissajous轨迹的电能质量扰动边-云协同高效辨识框架[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2024, 48(22): 210-223.
Zhang Xi, Zheng Jianyong, Mei Fei, et al.Lissajous locus-based efficient identification framework for power quality disturbances based on edge-cloud collaboration[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2024, 48(22): 210-223.
[10] Konkle J J, Goodwill P W, Carrasco-Zevallos O M, et al. Projection reconstruction magnetic particle imaging[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2013, 32(2): 338-347.
[11] 杨丹, 王雨忱, 李天兆, 等. 一种基于线性零磁场的动脉血管扫描成像方法仿真[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(2): 343-355.
Yang Dan, Wang Yuchen, Li Tianzhao, et al.Simulation of an arterial scanning imaging method based on linear zero magnetic field[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(2): 343-355.
[12] Tay Z W, Hensley D W, Vreeland E C, et al.The relaxation wall: experimental limits to improving MPI spatial resolution by increasing nanoparticle core size[J]. Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express, 2017, 3(3): 035003.
[13] 武明, 杜强, 柯丽, 等. 磁纳米粒子成像中非线性磁化信号二次谐波检测方法研究[J]. 电子测量与仪器学报, 2022, 36(9): 87-94.
Wu Ming, Du Qiang, Ke Li, et al.Research on second harmonic detection method of nonlinear magnetiza- tion signal in magnetic nanoparticle imaging[J]. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumenta- tion, 2022, 36(9): 87-94.
[14] Muslu Y, Utkur M, Demirel O B, et al.Calibration- free relaxation-based multi-color magnetic particle imaging[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2018, 37(8): 1920-1931.
[15] Arami H, Ferguson R M, Khandhar A P, et al.Size- dependent ferrohydrodynamic relaxometry of magnetic particle imaging tracers in different environments[J]. Medical Physics, 2013, 40(7): 071904.
[16] Ferguson R M, Minard K R, Krishnan K M.Optimization of nanoparticle core size for magnetic particle imaging[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2009, 321(10): 1548-1551.
[17] 姜策, 柯丽, 杜强, 等. 基于圆环磁体阵列的线型零磁场系统研究[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2021, 42(9): 192-201.
Jiang Ce, Ke Li, Du Qiang, et al.Research on the magnetic field-free line system based on ring magnet array[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2021, 42(9): 192-201.
[18] Top C B, Gungor A.Tomographic field free line magnetic particle imaging with an open-sided scanner configuration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2020, 39(12): 4164-4173.
[19] Goodwill P W, Conolly S M.Multidimensional x-space magnetic particle imaging[J]. IEEE Transac- tions on Medical Imaging, 2011, 30(9): 1581-1590.
[20] 闫孝姮, 淡新贤, 陈伟华, 等. 基于改进目标场法梯度线圈的感应式磁声磁粒子浓度成像研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(14): 4305-4316.
Yan Xiaoheng, Dan Xinxian, Chen Weihua, et al.Magneto-acoustic magnetic particle concentration imaging based on improved target field method gradient coil[J]. Transactions of China Electrotech- nical Society, 2024, 39(14): 4305-4316.
[21] 汤云东, 丁宇彬, 金涛. 基于亥姆霍兹线圈装置的磁热疗优化方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(5): 1248-1260.
Tang Yundong, Ding Yubin, Jin Tao.Research on optimization method of magnetic hyperthermia based on Helmholtz coil device[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(5): 1248-1260.
[22] 魏文琦, 张绍哲, 谢剑峰, 等. 脉冲强磁场磁感应强度测量技术研究进展[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(23): 7291-7308.
Wei Wenqi, Zhang Shaozhe, Xie Jianfeng, et al.Progress of magnetic induction intensity measurement techniques in the pulsed high magnetic field[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(23): 7291-7308.
[23] 祖婉妮. 开放结构磁性纳米粒子血管精细成像方法研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳工业大学, 2023.
Zu Wanni.Vascular precision imaging methods based on open-structure magnetic particle imaging[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang University of Technology, 2023.
[24] 杨丹, 刘素羽, 张昊, 等. 基于永磁体和线圈复合结构的磁性粒子成像零磁场研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2025, 40(2): 335-345.
Yang Dan, Liu Suyu, Zhang Hao, et al.Research on magnetic particle imaging zero magnetic field based on permanent magnet and coil composite structure[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2025, 40(2): 335-345.
[25] Schmale I, Rahmer J, Gleich B, et al.First phantom and in vivo MPI images with an extended field of view[C]//Medical Imaging 2011: Biomedical Applica- tions in Molecular, Structural, and Functional Imaging, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA, 2011: 796510.
[26] Tay Z W, Hensley D, Ma Jie, et al.Pulsed excitation in magnetic particle imaging[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2019, 38(10): 2389-2399.
[27] Jia Guang, Huang Liyu, Wang Ze, et al.Gradient- based pulsed excitation and relaxation encoding in magnetic particle imaging[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2022, 41(12): 3725-3733.