电动汽车驱动复用升压技术

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.L11033

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (5810 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Electric vehicles (EVs) are rapidly adopting 800 V high-voltage architectures to improve their performance, increase charging rates, and enhance overall efficiency. This shift promises significant benefits, such as shorter charging times, improved energy efficiency, and better compatibility with future fast-charging infrastructure. However, the deployment of charging infrastructure that can support 800V systems is currently limited due to high costs, stringent distribution network requirements, and slow adoption. Currently, most DC charging piles in use are based on a 400 V low-voltage platform, which creates a challenge for the widespread adoption of 800 V EVs. As a result, a critical issue that needs to be addressed is how to make the high-voltage architecture of electric vehicles compatible with the existing low-voltage charging piles during this transitional period and in the future.
To address this compatibility challenge, this study proposes a novel time-sharing multiplexing step-up charging topology and control strategy designed for electric vehicles. This strategy takes advantage of the fact that the drive system and the charging device do not operate simultaneously. When the vehicle is in charging mode, the motor winding is used as an energy storage inductor, and the motor inverter controller is repurposed as the chopper switch controller. Through a three-phase staggered parallel Boost circuit, the system achieves high-power boost conversion, making it possible to charge 800 V EVs from 400 V charging piles. This innovative approach improves compatibility with existing infrastructure while saving vehicle space, reducing weight, and lowering costs. Additionally, it increases the utilization rate of existing automotive components and public facilities, offering significant economic benefits and practical application value.
The first step in this research involved analyzing the 800V high-voltage architecture and its charging requirements, followed by an investigation of the transient characteristics of the converter. The coupling relationships and the equivalent structure of the embedded permanent magnet synchronous motor winding were studied. Mathematical modeling and coordinate transformation techniques were used to determine the inductance values of the three-phase windings, and the influence of rotor position on the inductance was quantified. To further optimize the system, external inductance was introduced to eliminate the effects of mutual inductance. The state-space averaging method was applied to analyze both the DC steady-state and AC small-signal characteristics of the converter, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the design of the control loop.
In terms of control strategy, the operating principles, advantages, and limitations of traditional voltage-current double-loop control and model predictive control (MPC) strategies were thoroughly analyzed. Given the unique characteristics of the equivalent inductance values of the three-phase windings in the multiplex boost converter motor, the research sought to improve the system's dynamic response speed while simplifying the design process. To achieve this, a hybrid control strategy combining PI (proportional-integral) control with MPC was proposed. The hybrid control retains the voltage loop PI regulator and incorporates an active current-sharing strategy. This PI-MPC hybrid control strategy enhances the system's dynamic response, especially in scenarios involving sudden load changes.
The effectiveness of the proposed control strategies was verified through simulation. Both the traditional dual-loop control and the PI-MPC hybrid control strategy demonstrated excellent performance, achieving zero-error output voltage, balanced three-phase currents, and input combined current ripple below ±10A in steady-state operation across various rotor positions. Additionally, the PI-MPC hybrid control strategy showed superior dynamic response compared to traditional dual-loop control, especially under sudden load changes, further proving its effectiveness.
To validate the theoretical findings, a 50 kW experimental platform was built in the Powertrain laboratory. The experiment involved a 250 V to 400 V boost conversion and the results were consistent with the simulations, verifying the accuracy of the proposed topology and control strategy. Overall, the study demonstrated that the designed drive multiplexing boost converter can reliably and stably achieve voltage boost through the integration of the vehicle’s drive system. This successfully addresses the challenge of making high-voltage architectures compatible with existing low-voltage charging piles, ensuring smooth and efficient operation during this crucial transition period for electric vehicle infrastructure.

Key words： Electric vehicle drive system time-sharing multiplexing staggered parallel Boost circuit

Received: 14 July 2024

PACS:

TM614

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Hou Wenbo
	Yang Ping
	Chen Ke
	Qu Bo
	Wu Wenrong

Cite this article:

Hou Wenbo,Yang Ping,Chen Ke等. Multiplexing Booster Technology for Electric Vehicle Drive[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(zk1): 95-105.

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.L11033 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2024/V39/Izk1/95

[1] 新能源汽车产业向智能制造转型是发展的必然趋势[J]. 材料保护, 2019, 52(7): 172-172.
The transformation of new energy automobile industry to intelligent manufacturing is an inevitable trend of development[J]. Materials Protection, 2019, 52(7): 172-172.
[2] 纪竹童. 电动汽车“驱动-充电”一体化拓扑研究[J]. 科学技术创新, 2021(15): 156-157.
Ji Zhutong.Research on “drive-charge” integrated topology of electric vehicle[J]. Scientific and Technological Innovation, 2021(15): 156-157.
[3] 严佳丽. 纯电动汽车高电压快充平台技术趋势[J].汽车制造业, 2022(2): 8-10,12.
Yan Jiali.Technology trend of high voltage fast charge platform for pure electric vehicles[J]. Automotive Industry, 2022(2): 8-10, 12.
[4] 李全, 暴杰, 赵慧超, 等. 车用电驱动系统技术发展趋势及其技术要求[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2021, 46(23): 188-192.
Li Quan, Bao Jie, Zhao Huichao, et al.Technical development trend and technical requirements of vehicle electric drive system[J]. Automobile Applied Technology, 2021, 46(23): 188-192.
[5] 暴杰, 胡晶, 许重斌, 等. 电动汽车800 V电驱动系统核心技术综述[J]. 汽车文摘, 2023(1): 1-9.
Bao Jie, Hu Jing, Xu Chongbin, et al.A review on core technologies of 800 V electric drive system for electric vehicles[J]. Automotive Digest, 2023(1): 1-9.
[6] 赵剑飞, 薛洋, 刘建波. 电动汽车用充电器与驱动器一体化拓扑研究[J]. 电子器件, 2016, 39(5): 1215-1219.
Zhao Jianfei, Xue Yang, Liu Jianbo.Research on the integration of charger and driver for electric vehicle[J]. Chinese Journal of Electron Devices, 2016, 39(5): 1215-1219.
[7] Pellegrino G, Armando E, Guglielmi P.An integral battery charger with power factor correction for electric scooter[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2010, 25(3): 751-759.
[8] Haghbin S, Khan K, Lundmark S, et al.Integrated chargers for EV’s and PHEV’s: examples and new solutions[C]//The XIX International Conference on Electrical Machines - ICEM, Rome, Italy, 2010: 1-6.
[9] Dusmez S, Khaligh A.A novel low cost integrated on-board charger topology for electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles[C]//2012 Twenty-Seventh Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Orlando, FL, USA, 2012: 2611-2616.
[10] Haghbin S, Lundmark S, Alakula M, et al.Grid-connected integrated battery chargers in vehicle applications: review and new solution[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2013, 60(2): 459-473.
[11] Solero L.Nonconventional on-board charger for electric vehicle propulsion batteries[J]. IEEE Tran-sactions on Vehicular Technology, 2001, 50(1): 144-149.
[12] Shi Lisheng, Meintz A, Ferdowsi M.Single-phase bidirectional AC-DC converters for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle applications[C]//2008 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, Harbin, China, 2008: 1-5.
[13] Pellegrino G, Armando E, Guglielmi P.An integral battery charger with power factor correction for electric scooter[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2010, 25(3): 751-759.
[14] 李春杰. 电动汽车充电与驱动集成化技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2016.
Li Chunjie.Research on integrated technology of charging and driving of electric vehicle[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016.
[15] 王艳敏, 曹雨晴, 夏红伟. Buck变换器的电压电流双闭环终端滑模控制[J]. 电机与控制学报, 2016, 20(8): 92-97.
Wang Yanming, Cao Yuqing, Xia Hongwei.Terminal sliding mode control for Buck converter with structure of voltage and current double closed loop[J]. Electric Machines & Control, 2016, 20(8): 92-97.
[16] 朱艺锋, 赵海龙, 张国澎, 等. 单相五电平整流器滑模模型预测控制[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(8): 2030-2039.
Zhu Yifeng, Zhao Hailong, Zhang Guopeng, et al.Sliding mode model predictive control of single-phase five-level rectifier[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(8): 2030-2039.
[17] 肖蕙蕙, 魏苏东, 郭强, 等. 优化开关序列的PWM整流器模型预测控制策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(14): 3665-3675, 3700.
Xiao Huihui, Wei Sudong, Guo Qiang, et al.Model predictive control strategy for PWM rectifier with optimized switching sequence[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(14): 3665-3675, 3700.
[18] Zhao Feng, Li Dong, Chen Xiaoqiang.Energy storage bidirectional DC-DC converter model predictive control[J]. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 2023, 27(1): 1975-1983.