变磁通记忆电机非线性模型与调磁电流脉冲轨迹优化研究

doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.230965

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (3064 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The development of variable flux memory machine (VFMM) is to tackle the issues of unchangeable air-gap flux and hence limited speed range, which are the main drawbacks of the traditional permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM). According to the operating condition, the air-gap flux of VFMM can be adjusted online by injecting a pulse-shaped d-axis current, so that the efficiency under different working points can be enhanced. The existing works in relation to the VFMM drives are rare. Most of them focus on improving the dynamic response of current controller and suppressing the torque fluctuation due to the injection of d-axis current pulse. No scholars have studied the relationship between the re-/de-magnetization current pulse trajectories and the resulted losses. To fulfill the gap, this paper gives a research on the key technical issue.
This work is based on a hybrid magnetic circuit VFMM (HMC-VFMM). Firstly, in order for an accurate description on the HMC-VFMM with complex electromagnetic properties, the magnetizing curve, the armature flux characteristic and the inductance characteristic are tested, on which basis, the nonlinear mathematical model is established. Secondly, the sine-shaped current pulse trajectories and the required voltages are analyzed. Then, an asymmetrical current pulse trajectory and its improved method are proposed in order to realize re-/de-magnetization and reduce the associated losses simultaneously. The corresponding voltage curves are analyzed in terms of the maximum amplitude. Thirdly, based on the established nonlinear mathematical model, a feedforward current controller considering the measured parameters is proposed. The proposed current controller is integrated into the mature flux-oriented control.
Finally, an experimental test rig based on the prototype of HMC-VFMM is constructed to verify the effectiveness of the foregoing theoretical analyses. The proposed feedforward current controller is tested at first. The control methods with and without the proposed feedforward current controller are compared. The results show that the dq-axis currents regulated by the method with the proposed controller perform better in terms of tracking errors. With the high-performed controller, the control performances of d-axis current with different trajectories and the corresponding voltage values are compared. For re- and de-magnetization operations, the magnitudes of the d-axis current pulse trajectories are set to +30 A and -25 A, respectively. Four trajectories including a sine-shaped current pulse trajectory and three asymmetrical current pulse trajectories with different durations are tested. The results show that the tested three asymmetrical current pulse trajectories can shorten the total time of magnetization processes and don’t enhance the voltage requirement. Then, the losses resulted from the magnetization operations with the four trajectories are measured and compared. The obtained data indicates that using the sine-shaped current pulse trajectory, the losses during re-and de-magnetization processes are 33.58 J and 27.88 J, respectively, and the copper losses account for 82.13% and 70.16%, respectively. With the three asymmetrical current pulse trajectories, the losses can be reduced by 22.57%, 11.97% and 1.46% for the re- magnetization operation and are 27.69%, 18.62% and 9.43% for the de- magnetization operation.
The following conclusions can be drawn according to the experimental results. (1) The proposed feedforward current controller considering measured parameters can improve the current control accuracy. (2) For the conventional sine-shaped current pulse trajectories, the peak value of voltage required for re- or de-magnetization operation appears at the rising stage and decreases gradually with the increase of the designed offset angle. (3) For the proposed asymmetric current pulse trajectories, by improving the duration of the recovery stage, the loss generated in the re-/de-magnetization processes can be effectively reduced without sacrificing the realization of re-/de-magnetization. (4)The improvement of current trajectory has a more significant impact on the demagnetization operation over the re-magnetization operation. This can lead to the peak value of the required phase voltage appearing in the recovery stage, thus causing the failure of demagnetization operation. Therefore, the selection of the duration of current pulse trajectory must consider the voltage allowance.

Key words： Variable flux memory machine permanent magnet synchronous machine nonlinear mathematical model current pulse trajectory feedforward current controller

Received: 20 June 2023

PACS:

TM341

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.230965 OR https://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2023/V38/I19/5128

[1] 黄海林, 李大伟, 曲荣海, 等. 磁齿轮复合永磁电机拓扑及应用综述[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(6): 1381-1397.
Huang Hailin, Li Dawei, Qu Ronghai, et al.A review of magnetic geared machines: topologies and applications[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(6) : 1381-1397.
[2] 梁子漪, 曲荣海, 陈智, 等. 双机电端口电机系统综述与发展展望[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(19): 4923-4937.
Liang Ziyi, Qu Ronghai, Chen Zhi, et al.Overview of dual-electrical-port dual-mechanical-port machine system and their development[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(19): 4923-4937.
[3] 孙玉华, 赵文祥, 吉敬华, 等. 高转矩性能多相组永磁电机及其关键技术综述[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023, 38(6): 1403-1420.
Sun Yuhua, Zhao Wenxiang, Ji Jinghua, et al.Overview of multi-star multi-phase permanent magnet machines with high torque performance and its key technologies[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023, 38(6): 1403-1420.
[4] 沈月芬, 刘旭. 考虑互感的多齿开关磁链永磁记忆电机的精确磁路模型[J]. 电工技术学报, 2022, 37(10) : 2435-2445.
Shen Yuefen, Liu Xu.Accurate magnetic circuit model of multi-tooth switched flux permanent magnet memory machine considering the mutual inductance[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2022, 37(10) : 2435-2445.
[5] Ostovic V.Memory motors[J]. IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, 2003, 9(1): 52-61.
[6] 胡俊杰, 赖信辉, 郭伟, 等. 考虑电动汽车灵活性与风电消纳的区域电网多时间尺度调度[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022, 46(16) : 52-60.
Hu Junjie, Lai Xinhui, Guo Wei, et al.Multi-time-scale scheduling for regional power grid considering flexibility of electric vehicle and wind power accommodation[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46(16) : 52-60.
[7] 王晓姬, 王道涵, 王柄东, 等. 电动汽车驱动/充电一体化系统及其控制策略综述[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023电动汽车驱动/充电一体化系统及其控制策略综述[J]. 电工技术学报, 2023: 1-18. http://doi.org/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.230583.
Wang Xiaoji, Wang Daohan, Wang Bingdong, et al.A review of drive-charging integrated systems and control strategies for electric vehicles[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023: 1-18. A review of drive-charging integrated systems and control strategies for electric vehicles[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2023: 1-18. http://doi.org/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.230583.
[8] Yu Chuang, Chau K T.Design, analysis, and control of DC-excited memory motors[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2011, 26(2): 479-489.
[9] Yu Kailiang, Wang Zheng.Improved deadbeat predictive current control of dual three-phase variable-flux PMSM drives with composite disturbance observer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2022, 37(7): 8310-8321.
[10] Zhong Yuxiang, Lin Heyun, Wang Jiyao, et al.Variable time magnetization current trajectory control method for variable flux memory machines[J]. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2022, 8(3): 3100-3110.
[11] Chen Junhua, Li Jian, Qu Ronghai.Analysis, modeling, and current trajectory control of magnetization state manipulation in variable-flux permanent magnet machines[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2019, 66(7): 5133-5143.
[12] Chen Zhiyong, Lin Heyun, Zhong Yuxiang, et al.A novel current control strategy for magnetization state manipulation of variable flux memory machine based on linear active disturbance rejection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2022, 37(2): 1962-1971.
[13] Yu C Y, Fukushige T, Limsuwan N, et al.Variable-flux machine torque estimation and pulsating torque mitigation during magnetization state manipulation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2014, 50(5): 3414-3422.
[14] Yuuki K, Sakai K, Mochikawa H. Variable-flux motor drive system: US8179068[P].2012-05-15.
[15] 仲宇翔, 林鹤云, 王激尧, 等. 基于滑模控制的记忆电机调磁转速波动抑制[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43(7): 2512-2520.
Zhong Yuxiang, Lin Heyun, Wang Jiyao, et al.Speed variation suppression for memory machine during magnetization state manipulation based on sliding mode control[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43(7): 2512-2520.
[16] Zhong Yuxiang, Lin Heyun, Wang Jiyao, et al.Speed fluctuation mitigation control for variable flux memory machine during magnetization state manipulations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2023, 70(1): 222-232.
[17] Chen Junhua, Fang Haiyang, Qu Ronghai.Online magnetization trajectory prediction and current control for a variable-flux permanent magnet machine[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 41325-41334.
[18] Yang Hui, Lyu Shukang, Lin Heyun, et al.A novel hybrid-magnetic-circuit variable flux memory machine[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2020, 67(7): 5258-5268.
[19] Chen Junhua, Li Jian, Qu Ronghai, et al.Magnet-frozen-permeability FEA and DC-biased measurement for machine inductance: application on a variable-flux PM machine[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2018, 65(6): 4599-4607.
[20] 王锐, 刘卫国, 孙承浩. 基于电压脉冲注入和傅里叶拟合的转子绕线式同步起动/发电机初始位置检测方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(5): 1981-1991.
Wang Rui, Liu Weiguo, Sun Chenghao.Initial rotor position estimation method for a wound-rotor synchronous starter/generator based on voltage pulse injection and Fourier fitting[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42(5): 1981-1991.