计及无功充裕度的电力系统可靠性评估与规划(英文)

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (328 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract A new method of power system reliability evaluation is presented. This method is based on the combination of Monte Carlo simulation and the decoupled optimal power flow (OPF) algorithm, and takes into account both reactive power adequacy and bus voltage constraints. Using the proposed method, the systematic calculations of the reliability indices for the Roy Billinton test system (RBTS) have been performed. Especially, the dependences of the reliability indices on unit capacity and reactive power adequacy are analyzed in detail, and the new technique for improving system reliability is suggested, which can provides the reliability-effective approach in power system planning and operation.

Key words： Power system reliability reactive power adequacy Monte Carlo simulation reliability planning

Received: 11 January 2008 Published: 14 February 2014

PACS:

TM732

About author:: Song Xiaotong was born in 1982, is currently working toward the PhD degree, his research interests are the planning and reliability evaluation of power system. Tan Zhenyu was born in 1957, Professor, PhD supervisor of Shandong University since 2004, his current interests are in the field of electromagnetic radiation biological effects.

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

http://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/ OR http://dgjsxb.ces-transaction.com/EN/Y2009/V24/I5/169

[1] Celo M, Bualoti R. Integrated indices that reflect reliability assessment for generation and transmission network[C]. IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, Benalmadena (Malaga), Spain, 2006: 978-981.
[2] Lu M, Dong Z Y, Saha T K. A framework for transmission planning in a competitive electricity market[C]. 2005 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distri- bution Conference & Exhibition: Asia and Pacific, DaLian, China, 2005: 1-6．
[3] Billinton R, Khan E. A security based approach to composite power system reliability evaluation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1992, 7(7): 65-72.
[4] Borges C L T, Falcao D M, Mellon J C O. Composite reliability evaluation by sequential Monte Carlo simulation on parallel and distributed processing environment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2001, 16(2): 203-208.
[5] Singh C, Mitra J. Composite system reliability eval- uation using state space pruning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1997, 12 (1): 471-479.
[6] Greatbanks J A, Pregelj A, Green T C. On optimi- zation for security and reliability of power systems with distributed generation[C]. 2003 IEEE Bologna Powe Tech Conference, Bologna, Italy, 2003, 1: 1-8.
[7] Singh C, Gubbala N V. An alternative approach to rounding off generation models in power system reliability evaluation[J]. Electric Power System Research, 1996, 36(1): 37-44.
[8] Billinton R, Allan R N. Reliability evaluation of power systems[M]. 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Press, 1996.
[9] Jonnavithula S, Billinton R. Cost-benefit analysis of generation additions in system planning[J]. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 1998, 145(3): 288-292.
[10] Okada K, Kitamura M, Asano H, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of reliability management by transmission expansion planning in the competitive electric power market[C]. International Conference on Power System Technology, Perth, Australia, 2000, 2: 709-714.
[11] Ding Y, Wang P, Goel L, et al. Reliability assessment of restructured power systems using reliability network equivalent and pseudo-sequential simulation techniques[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2007, 77 (12): 1665-1671.
[12] Khan M E. Bulk load points reliability evaluation using a security based model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1998, 13 (2): 456-463.
[13] Aboreshaid S, Billinton R. A framework for incor- porating voltage and transient stability considerations in well-being evaluation of composite power systems [C]. IEEE Power engineering Society Summer Meeting, Edmonton, Canada, 1999, 1: 219-224.
[14] Allan R N, Billinton R, Breipohl A M, et al. Bibli- ography on the application of probability methods in power system reliability evaluation: 1987-1991[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1994, 9(1): 41-49.
[15] Allan R N, Billinton R, Breipohl A M, et al. Bibli- ography on the application of probability methods in power system reliability evaluation: 1992-1996[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(1): 51-57.
[16] Billinton R, Fotuhi Firuzabad M, Bertling L. Biblio- graphy on the application of probability methods in power system reliability evaluation: 1996-1999[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2001, 16(4): 595-602.
[17] Billinton R, Kumar S, Chowdury N, et al. A reliability test system for educational purposes[J]. IEEE Trans- actions on Power Systems, 1989, 4(3): 1238-1244.
[18] Billinton R, Fotuhi Firuzabad M. A reliability fram- ework for generating unit commitment[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2000, 56(1): 81-88.
[19] Tollefson G, Billinton R, Wacker G, et al. A Canadian customer survey to assess power system reliability worth[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1994, 9 (1): 443-450.
[20] Chowdhury A A, Koval D O. Application of customer interruption costs in transmission network reliability planning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Appli- cations, 2001, 37(6): 1590-1596.
[21] Neudorf E G, Kiguel D L, Hamoud G A, et al. Cost- benefit analysis of power system reliability: two utility case studies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1995, 10(3): 1667-1675.